What's new

Pakistan does not need IMF support

Neo

RETIRED

New Recruit

Joined
Nov 1, 2005
Messages
18
Reaction score
0

EDITORIAL (August 20 2008): Mohsin Khan, International Monetary Fund's (IMF) Director for the Middle East and Central Asia categorically denied that Pakistan had requested any loan from the IMF. He added that Pakistan would not require IMF assistance in the next 10 months, or till the end of the current fiscal year, with two provisos: the government must succeed in slashing expenditure, inclusive of subsidies on oil and products, and accesses other sources of funding to offset falling reserves.

This advice conforms to basic tenets of economic theory: a sustainable budget deficit and adequate foreign exchange reserves are critical to cauterising weak macroeconomic fundamentals, like a falling external rupee value, rising rate of inflation, and promoting investment, both foreign and domestic, in an effort to increase productivity and propel the Gross Domestic Product growth.

The question, however, is whether this is doable. Can the government, for example, slash expenditure and generate other sources of funding to strengthen its reserves position? Slashing expenditure, especially on subsidies, constitutes one of the most unpopular decisions that can be undertaken by an elected government, especially given the inflationary pressures that have forced many of our low income earners to a below subsistence level income. This, in turn, has led to a rise in the number of suicides as well as a rise in the number of parents leaving their children on the doorstep of charities etc.

Be that as it may, the government has reduced subsidies on oil and products and even though there is general anger against the decision of the government to continue to increase the price of oil and products in spite of the rather significant decline in the international price of oil, the fact remains that from the point of view of economic policy focused on reducing inflation this is a bitter pill that the people of this country will have to swallow for some time to come. To neutralise the effect of rising oil prices on the very poor the government has decided to extend subsidies to those living below the subsistence level through the issuance of Benazir cards and food stamps that would provide some support to them in their effort to make ends meet. Targeted subsidies are always to be supported over and above general subsidies like an across the board subsidy on the price of oil.

With respect to Mohsin Khan's statement about the need to access sources of funding that would offset falling foreign exchange reserves, the recent statement by Naveed Qamar, the Finance Minister, is significant. He stated that Pakistan was expecting around 3.5 billion dollars by the end of September out of which one billion dollars would be released by international financial institutions (IFIs), a fact reconfirmed by Mohsin Khan, and the remaining 2.5 billion dollars from remittances.

The State Bank of Pakistan reported that total remittances received (July-April) 2007 were $5.3 billion - an increase of $868.96 million over the corresponding period last year; and if this trend continued remittances would rise by $5.8 billion by the end of June 2008. However if the 2007-08 trend continues till the end of September 2008 then the remittance income would be around 1.4 billion dollars by the end of September and not the extremely optimistic figure quoted by the Finance Minister of 2.5 billion dollars. Nonetheless even the 2.45 billion dollars by end of September from the IFIs as well as remittance income will provide significant support to our foreign exchange reserves.

An eroding rupee has dramatically raised the government's foreign debt servicing payment and that of course will increase the pressure on expenditure. For Mohsin Khan to state that the rupee should be allowed to settle at its true market value maybe sound like an advice for a country that is in the throes of a downward business cycle rather than one which has weak macroeconomic fundamentals all around.

This is attributed to the rape of the economy because of heavy subsidies and corruption of the former government but also the National Reconciliation Ordinance that has resulted in the de-freezing of accounts with the departure of billions of dollars from the country's banking system. One would hope therefore that the Pakistan government would formulate its own prescriptions instead of relying on the standard normal ones proposed by IMF that have generated controversy in other countries. For this, it is required to think out of the box and a complete change of economic managers/advisors is required.
 
.
Neo
Cn you kindly provide me the details of IMF's loans to Pakistan. As far as I know IMF is not known to be a major lending agent(although it does give loans) , it's focuses on monetary regulation, so I suspect whether not seeking loans from IMF is an indicator of economic strength.
 
. .

The IMF, directly and indirectly, has played a crucial role in the macroeconomic stability of Pakistan since 1988. On the one hand, it has provided direct bilateral support to Pakistan in order to cope with its macroeconomic imbalances like balance of payment deficits. On the other hand, the IMF has indirect influence on lending by other donor agencies. This is evident from the fact that whenever Pakistan enjoyed good relations with the IMF, other lending agencies also provided money to Pakistan and vice versa. The IMF credit rating of a borrowing country is taken very seriously by other donor agencies. The IMF also influences policies of lending countries to a great extent. According to Dr. Ishrat Husain:

The IMF enjoys excessive concentration of power and has a virtual monopoly of knowledge and ideas in prescribing as to what are the right policies a country ought to follow. It has disproportionately large influence on financing provided by other players—development banks, fund managers, debt relief by Paris and London Clubs and syndicate lending by commercial banksÉA negative assessment by the IMF or even a failure to complete on time places the reputational capital of the borrowing country at great risk, erodes its credibility in the financial markets and reduces financial flows into the country. There are instances where this created a snowball effect amplifying the disequilibrium in macroeconomic balances as the IMF and other financiers collectively withheld their assistance. [65]

Since 1988, Pakistan has not enjoyed smooth relations with the IMF, because of the latter's dissatisfaction with the economic performance of Pakistan. Pakistan signed several agreements with the IMF, but due to a variety of factors most of them remained incomplete, with the IMF refusing to lend the full amounts to Pakistan. It must be remembered that in the 1990s, the nation suffered many losses on the economic front and the era is thus considered a "lost decade" for the economy of Pakistan. All macroeconomic indicators showed poor performance, bringing Pakistan to the brink of default. Moreover, the IMF's relations with Pakistan were further strained by 1997 due to the policies of former Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto. Large-scale corruption by her People's Party and its resistance to structural reforms irritated the IMF and World Bank.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom