What's new

Pakistan conducted another successful test fire of indigenously developed Submarine Launched Cruise

P.S; You are still fukin struggling with an “old fashioned sub-sonic CMs nirbhay”... so much for your fukin rants.


BABUR SLCM is too painful to take for our enemies;

View attachment 462541


It’s big,red (not pointy) and hits their “spot” real hard.
sub-sonic CMs nirbhay isn't old fashioned ,but years ahead in tech such as low flying capability , loitering and Turbo jet engine compared to much vaunted and truly old fashioned pakistani BAbur CM .

BTW what sort of engine does Babur CM carries ??
 
.
We did it ourselves as we did with the Harpoon's.
Uncle Sam covertly allow us and even provided some tech (Babur) when Gen Musharraf contacted them upon Indian test of ABM.

sub-sonic CMs nirbhay isn't old fashioned ,but years ahead in tech such as low flying capability , loitering and Turbo jet engine compared to much vaunted and truly old fashioned pakistani BAbur CM .

BTW what sort of engine does Babur CM carries ??
Boss d k....you are claiming this even after 5th failure....now cry me a river...
 
.
Now fake Chu***** so called experts will wake up all night for few days just to rant fake fake fake Chinese missile blah blah blah


Congratulations Pakistan loved the video
well without those expert choozazzz, this news wudn't had been that much interesting
 
.
sub-sonic CMs nirbhay isn't old fashioned ,but years ahead in tech such as low flying capability , loitering and Turbo jet engine compared to much vaunted and truly old fashioned pakistani BAbur CM .

BTW what sort of engine does Babur CM carries ??
Lmao.. your Pakistani husbands did that decade back;
74A597FE-A7A4-46D4-A2A4-46747F42F646.jpeg



14FD235B-7F07-4E19-85AD-9EE107B63AB0.jpeg


Now develop it first papu.

Uncle Sam covertly allow us and even provided some tech (Babur) when Gen Musharraf contacted them upon Indian test of ABM.


Boss d k....you are claiming this even after 5th failure....now cry me a river...
:rofl:
 
.
Leave everything aside, I am waiting for that subhuman RAJ47 comments. The real fun will start after that. :D
 
.
Keeping all the rhetoric aside, as a man of science, I must congratulate Pakistan for having accomplished this feat if they really did it on their own. These are some of the instances Where I feel they should be a little bit more transparent. Anyways this particular launch does seem legit and also if one observes carefully, this one is "different" from the previous launch. Which also proves that previous launch wasn't actually a Pakistani launch.
I'd like to highlight that capability to achieve a controlled underwater ignition and clearing it off water is nothing short of really good achievement for Pakistan. What is also commendable is the fact that Pakistan somehow is able to produce the system in house without actually having serious R&D in any of the specific areas of aerospace or sub systems. For instance Pakistan does not have any R&D in micro turbofans/jets, aerospace grade actuators or navigation boards(military grade), yet they've a working system at their disposal.
For India it would indeed complicate the nuclear equation when Chinese submarine first start arriving in Pakistan. That's the time when these nuclear armed baburs would be integrated onto a real naval platform. All the gossip of changing the combat management system of Agosta to accommodate Baburs is way off the mark for the simple reason that combat management systems are highly proprietary and one doesn't have authorization to tweak the code to incorporate let's say a mission planner for the cruise missile. Mission planner is a software that is embedded into the launch platform that provides a way of navigation way points to the missile. These navigation way points form the outer loop that the control system is required to track. I've published one such paper at AIAA(American Institute of aeronautics and astronautics) and another one using advanced neural networks based controller is on the way.
 
.
Uncle Sam covertly allow us and even provided some tech (Babur) when Gen Musharraf contacted them upon Indian test of ABM.


Boss d k....you are claiming this even after 5th failure....now cry me a river...
kuan sa failure be ?? Last November 2017 test was a total success .

India successfully test fires indigenous subsonic cruise missile Nirbhay off Odisha coast

https://www.firstpost.com/india/ind...missile-nirbhay-off-odisha-coast-4197449.html

Nirbhay test successful: India demonstrates capability to develop long range cruise missiles

http://www.newindianexpress.com/nat...velop-long-range-cruise-missiles-1694848.html


 
.
Keeping all the rhetoric aside, as a man of science, I must congratulate Pakistan for having accomplished this feat if they really did it on their own. These are some of the instances Where I feel they should be a little bit more transparent. Anyways this particular launch does seem legit and also if one observes carefully, this one is "different" from the previous launch. Which also proves that previous launch wasn't actually a Pakistani launch.
I'd like to highlight that capability to achieve a controlled underwater ignition and clearing it off water is nothing short of really good achievement for Pakistan. What is also commendable is the fact that Pakistan somehow is able to produce the system in house without actually having serious R&D in any of the specific areas of aerospace or sub systems. For instance Pakistan does not have any R&D in micro turbofans/jets, aerospace grade actuators or navigation boards(military grade), yet they've a working system at their disposal.
For India it would indeed complicate the nuclear equation when Chinese submarine first start arriving in Pakistan. That's the time when these nuclear armed baburs would be integrated onto a real naval platform. All the gossip of changing the combat management system of Agosta to accommodate Baburs is way off the mark for the simple reason that combat management systems are highly proprietary and one doesn't have authorization to tweak the code to incorporate let's say a mission planner for the cruise missile. Mission planner is a software that is embedded into the launch platform that provides a way of navigation way points to the missile. These navigation way points form the outer loop that the control system is required to track. I've published one such paper at AIAA(American Institute of aeronautics and astronautics) and another one using advanced neural networks based controller is on the way.


Bas hogaya Shuru tu? :rofl::rofl:

This dumba$$ still believes Pakistan doesn't have "serious R&D" in fields related to advance missile technology and yet Pakistan has built MIRV ballistic missile systems and submarine/submerged launched nuclear cruise missiles. Keep living in your gullible bharti idiocracy.

You won't be getting the info you want. Bugger off.
 
.
kuan sa failure be ?? Last November 2017 test was a total success .

India successfully test fires indigenous subsonic cruise missile Nirbhay off Odisha coast

https://www.firstpost.com/india/ind...missile-nirbhay-off-odisha-coast-4197449.html

Nirbhay test successful: India demonstrates capability to develop long range cruise missiles

http://www.newindianexpress.com/nat...velop-long-range-cruise-missiles-1694848.html

Partial success missile unable to reach target or desired range....google it my Sanghi chadi clad fellow PDF member.
 
.
kuan sa failure be ?? Last November 2017 test was a total success .

India successfully test fires indigenous subsonic cruise missile Nirbhay off Odisha coast

https://www.firstpost.com/india/ind...missile-nirbhay-off-odisha-coast-4197449.html

Nirbhay test successful: India demonstrates capability to develop long range cruise missiles

http://www.newindianexpress.com/nat...velop-long-range-cruise-missiles-1694848.html


Wow...clapping.

Your sh!thole nation did something that Pakistan was doing more than a DECADE ago.
 
.
Keeping all the rhetoric aside, as a man of science, I must congratulate Pakistan for having accomplished this feat if they really did it on their own. These are some of the instances Where I feel they should be a little bit more transparent. Anyways this particular launch does seem legit and also if one observes carefully, this one is "different" from the previous launch. Which also proves that previous launch wasn't actually a Pakistani launch.
I'd like to highlight that capability to achieve a controlled underwater ignition and clearing it off water is nothing short of really good achievement for Pakistan. What is also commendable is the fact that Pakistan somehow is able to produce the system in house without actually having serious R&D in any of the specific areas of aerospace or sub systems. For instance Pakistan does not have any R&D in micro turbofans/jets, aerospace grade actuators or navigation boards(military grade), yet they've a working system at their disposal.
For India it would indeed complicate the nuclear equation when Chinese submarine first start arriving in Pakistan. That's the time when these nuclear armed baburs would be integrated onto a real naval platform. All the gossip of changing the combat management system of Agosta to accommodate Baburs is way off the mark for the simple reason that combat management systems are highly proprietary and one doesn't have authorization to tweak the code to incorporate let's say a mission planner for the cruise missile. Mission planner is a software that is embedded into the launch platform that provides a way of navigation way points to the missile. These navigation way points form the outer loop that the control system is required to track. I've published one such paper at AIAA(American Institute of aeronautics and astronautics) and another one using advanced neural networks based controller is on the way.
Denial is a death my friend.....

Keep in that state .. like you have real situation when you scratch your heads, what to do...
 
.
Keeping all the rhetoric aside, as a man of science, I must congratulate Pakistan for having accomplished this feat if they really did it on their own. These are some of the instances Where I feel they should be a little bit more transparent. Anyways this particular launch does seem legit and also if one observes carefully, this one is "different" from the previous launch. Which also proves that previous launch wasn't actually a Pakistani launch.
I'd like to highlight that capability to achieve a controlled underwater ignition and clearing it off water is nothing short of really good achievement for Pakistan. What is also commendable is the fact that Pakistan somehow is able to produce the system in house without actually having serious R&D in any of the specific areas of aerospace or sub systems. For instance Pakistan does not have any R&D in micro turbofans/jets, aerospace grade actuators or navigation boards(military grade), yet they've a working system at their disposal.
For India it would indeed complicate the nuclear equation when Chinese submarine first start arriving in Pakistan. That's the time when these nuclear armed baburs would be integrated onto a real naval platform. All the gossip of changing the combat management system of Agosta to accommodate Baburs is way off the mark for the simple reason that combat management systems are highly proprietary and one doesn't have authorization to tweak the code to incorporate let's say a mission planner for the cruise missile. Mission planner is a software that is embedded into the launch platform that provides a way of navigation way points to the missile. These navigation way points form the outer loop that the control system is required to track. I've published one such paper at AIAA(American Institute of aeronautics and astronautics) and another one using advanced neural networks based controller is on the way.
More Randi Rona from the usual cretin.

Wow...clapping.

Your sh!thole nation did something that Pakistan was doing more than a DECADE ago.
Nah.. so called nirbhay is still nowhere.

And Pak did it back in early 2000s.
 
.
kuan sa failure be ?? Last November 2017 test was a total success .

India successfully test fires indigenous subsonic cruise missile Nirbhay off Odisha coast

https://www.firstpost.com/india/ind...missile-nirbhay-off-odisha-coast-4197449.html

Nirbhay test successful: India demonstrates capability to develop long range cruise missiles

http://www.newindianexpress.com/nat...velop-long-range-cruise-missiles-1694848.html

India needed another decade to get nirbhy working ..so for its still a big failure like arjun & teja
 
. .
sub-sonic CMs nirbhay isn't old fashioned ,but years ahead in tech such as low flying capability , loitering and Turbo jet engine compared to much vaunted and truly old fashioned pakistani BAbur CM .

BTW what sort of engine does Babur CM carries ??
World number 1 shupa dhupa Cruje mijjail with shupa dhupa creepy engine
@I S I @DESERT FIGHTER @Maarkhoor
 
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom