Pakistan condemns attacks in Jammu region

[Thorough Pro]

WTF.......why do we have to be so apologetic? India sponsors terrorism in Pakistan and we condemn self defending Kashmiri people against occupying indian scum forces

 

[Icewolf]

India deserved this for occupying Kashmir

 

[Jade]

Official statement from Pak on condemning terrorism in Kashmir... Has Pak gaveup on Kashmir?

 

[Cruizer]

which part of my post did you fine me blaming pakistan.

Dear,

Fact is that Pakistan is all over in India.
Why . . . ? Because what ever happened in any state in India then, blames goes directly to Pakistan. Even no investigation has done.

Your news channels always saying/using so bad words against us. Yes all the time. Our news channels showing as followinG

WOW, Aaj Katrina ki salgira hai. Aaf Saif Ali khan ne falan film join ki. Salman Khan beemar ho gya. Shah Rooks ko paon mein moch aagi.

 

[Star Wars]

good call by Pakistan...peace has to prevail ...

 

[shiv]

pakistan has apologised .. welcome development

 

[bandit]

Am I dreaming or what, Pakistan condemning freedom fighters.

They even called them terrorists.

Seems Nawaz wants to suck up to Manmohan in DC.

 

[That Guy]

pakistan has apologised .. welcome development

It's not an apology, as Pakistan has nothing to apologize for.

 

[shiv]

It's not an apology, as Pakistan has nothing to apologize for.

learn english.. its an apology under the veil ! Never ever has the pakistani govt disowned the lashkars like they did this time.. last time such blatant disowning happened was during the Kargil war !

 

[That Guy]

learn english.. its an apology under the veil ! Never ever has the pakistani govt disowned the lashkars like they did this time.. last time such blatant disowning happened was during the Kargil war !

I speak English quite well, thank you very much. There is no need to be rude.

First of all, Pakistan has always said that these militants do not receive any sort of aid from Pakistan, which means that Pakistan disowned them a long time ago. It's only Indian accusations that claimed otherwise.

This is not an apology, it is simply playing diplomacy. Pakistan can and will continue to morally support the aspirations of the Kashmiri people, this is just to preempt Indian accusations that the militants were supported by Pakistan. Manmohan Singh needs an excuse to push off the pressure from the Indian opposition that's saying he should not talk to Pakistan. Meanwhile, Nawaz Sharif is trying to build a better relationship with India, so the civilian government can finally wrestle Pakistan's foreign agenda out of the military's control and build a stronger economy.

Again, this isn't an apology, it's simply diplomatic maneuvering.

 

[shiv]

I speak English quite well, thank you very much. There is no need to be rude.

First of all, Pakistan has always said that these militants do not receive any sort of aid from Pakistan, which means that Pakistan disowned them a long time ago. It's only Indian accusations that claimed otherwise.

This is not an apology, it is simply playing diplomacy. Pakistan can and will continue to morally support the aspirations of the Kashmiri people, this is just to preempt Indian accusations that the militants were supported by Pakistan. Manmohan Singh needs an excuse to push off the pressure from the Indian opposition that's saying he should not talk to Pakistan. Meanwhile, Nawaz Sharif is trying to build a better relationship with India, so the civilian government can finally wrestle Pakistan's foreign agenda out of the military's control and build a stronger economy.

Again, this isn't an apology, it's simply diplomatic maneuvering.

say what ? Indian PM inspite of the fidayeen attack chose to go ahead with the talks. Thats a fact ! Now pakistan didn't have the balls to show "moral support" in foreign turf ! They promptly disowned them so that atleast nobody could argue that pakistan doesn't wan't peace ! You guys had no other choice !

 

[That Guy]

say what ? Indian PM inspite of the fidayeen attack chose to go ahead with the talks. Thats a fact ! Now pakistan didn't have the balls to show "moral support" in foreign turf ! They promptly disowned them so that atleast nobody could argue that pakistan doesn't wan't peace ! You guys had no other choice !

Actually, the India PM wasn't sure about the meeting, as domestic pressure was mounting by the BJP. With the elections coming up Congress can't afford to look weak.

Doesn't have the balls? Do you even know what you're talking about? They could have gone ahead and not said anything, but unlike India's current opposition, Pakistan has no desire to start a conflict.

Pakistan has plenty of choices, but for the sake of peace Pakistan chose this path, and you call us cowards for choosing peace over violence?

So, according to your logic, we're either cowards or terrorists, right? Dude, just keep quiet, you're embarrassing yourself.

 

[chhota bheem]

I speak English quite well, thank you very much. There is no need to be rude.

First of all, Pakistan has always said that these militants do not receive any sort of aid from Pakistan, which means that Pakistan disowned them a long time ago. It's only Indian accusations that claimed otherwise.

This is not an apology, it is simply playing diplomacy. Pakistan can and will continue to morally support the aspirations of the Kashmiri people, this is just to preempt Indian accusations that the militants were supported by Pakistan. Manmohan Singh needs an excuse to push off the pressure from the Indian opposition that's saying he should not talk to Pakistan. Meanwhile, Nawaz Sharif is trying to build a better relationship with India, so the civilian government can finally wrestle Pakistan's foreign agenda out of the military's control and build a stronger economy.

Again, this isn't an apology, it's simply diplomatic maneuvering.

wont you think you are contrdicting your statement.on one hand you say pakistan disowned them then in the next para you say pakistan can and will morally support the cause and your gove said its a terrorists act which means you gove is calling them terrorists ,so which one is true.

 

[That Guy]

wont you think you are contrdicting your statement.on one hand you say pakistan disowned them then in the next para you say pakistan can and will morally support the cause and your gove said its a terrorists act which means you gove is calling them terrorists ,so which one is true.

Try reading my comment again.

What I said is that the militants have been disowned, not the Kashmiri people.

here is the part you're referring to;

First of all, Pakistan has always said that these militants do not receive any sort of aid from Pakistan, which means that Pakistan disowned them a long time ago. It's only Indian accusations that claimed otherwise.

This is not an apology, it is simply playing diplomacy. Pakistan can and will continue to morally support the aspirations of the Kashmiri people,

Unless you're suggesting that all Kashmiris are militants, in which case you would be a racist, but we both know you're smarter than that.

 

[IBRIS]

yup.............because india got terrorised by this terrorism.............

Really, what about the fire crackers going off in your neck of woods.? Good karma and bad karma is the word, there is no Disney land after life. That's why you live once as smartest being on the planet.