What's new

Pakistan, China and Naxalites are main threats, says IAF chief

Again Pakistani Members here talking with-out Head or Tail and Windy Jammed Tops the List.

Point 1 - 48 & 65 Pakistan Army used "Kabilie" or militia to assist Army this was genesis of the Mukti Bahini concept for 71.

Point 2 - Strategy of 1000 Cuts has Failed read.

Point 3 - Dont ever Leave your soldiers unclaimed. We lost 62 but took each and every Deceased Hero with us.

If you can fight come, But Learn to maintain Dignity of War respect for Dignity !!
 
Last edited:
.
All this time you were totally ignorant about what Papa Bhutto did back in '65 ? Cmon, I know you are stupid, ignorant too ?
Listen idiot, what your Papa Bhutto did to you back in 1965 was due to you for not honouring UN resolutions.
And don't forget his daughter also saved you losing a part of your country but your bankrupt mindset will never accept that.
 
.
who supported LTTE??? indians??? ohhh do u know they were the first 1 to come up with the idea of blowing themselves up... who taught them these tactics?? ohhh indians????
You don't know a thing about LTTE, or for that matter your own country. Try reading up a bit first.

Listen idiot, what your Papa Bhutto did to you back in 1965 was due to you for not honouring UN resolutions.
And don't forget his daughter also saved you losing a part of your country but your bankrupt mindset will never accept that.
Whoever taught you that should commit suicide. It is Indian effort for which you got the UN Resolutions.
Don't blame other because you couldn't implement it. It is your inefficiency.
Now, getting back to my question, by your logic, Pakistani army is also a terrorist organization, right ?
 
.
Answer the question first then I will give you a list.

Funny thing, slave mentality. The touchstone remains to be US.

Hmm lemme answer your question, I don't see any difference between a person who blows himself to kill civilians and a person who presides over a mass murder of thousands of people, who are burnt alive, who presides over specific targetting of pregnant muslim women, whose fetuses are pulled out, tossed in the air, collected on swords and then burnt. Don't believe me internet is filled with first hand accounts and pictures of burnt bodies.
Its way more pathetic than being a terrorist !!!
 
.
Hmm lemme answer your question, I don't see any difference between a person who blows himself to kill civilians and a person who presides over a mass murder of thousands of people, who are burnt alive, who presides over specific targetting of pregnant muslim women, whose fetuses are pulled out, tossed in the air, collected on swords and then burnt. Don't believe me internet is filled with first hand accounts and pictures of burnt bodies.
Its way more pathetic than being a terrorist !!!
Do you have any idea how the system of judiciary works ? You have something like that in Pakistan ?
 
.
You don't know a thing about LTTE, or for that matter your own country. Try reading up a bit first.


Whoever taught you that should commit suicide. It is Indian effort for which you got the UN Resolutions. Now, getting back to my question, by your logic, Pakistani army is also a terrorist organization, right ?

You don't know a thing about LTTE, or for that matter your own country. Try reading up a bit first.



ofcourse you know more about LTTE as you created, sponsored ,nourished & supported it ....

Do you have any idea how the system of judiciary works ? You have something like that in Pakistan ?

ohh you have great judiciary which couldnt solve ayodhya issue, ohh wat was the verdict in gujurat massacre case???
 
. .
Do you have any idea how the system of judiciary works ? You have something like that in Pakistan ?

Ye we have I wish you were more aware of regional developments in the last few years !!!

1) Lawyers movement sent a powerful military ruler like Musharaf home, he has been summoned and facing cases involving various charges since then.

2) A serving Prime Minister was summoned to Supreme Court and indicted ( did this ever happen in India ?)
Later he was removed from his office. PM bows before law, soothes nerves - Pakistan - DAWN.COM

3) Former PM Raja Parvez Ashraf was summoned to Supreme Court numerous times over corruption charges SC summons former PM in development funds case - Pakistan - DAWN.COM
 
.
Ye we have I wish you were more aware of regional developments in the last few years !!!

1) Lawyers movement sent a powerful military ruler like Musharaf home, he has been summoned and facing cases involving various charges since then.

2) A serving Prime Minister was summoned to Supreme Court and indicted ( did this ever happen in India ?)
Later he was removed from his office. PM bows before law, soothes nerves - Pakistan - DAWN.COM

3) Former PM Raja Parvez Ashraf was summoned to Supreme Court numerous times over corruption charges SC summons former PM in development funds case - Pakistan - DAWN.COM
The question is, do you know how it works ?

The case that you had been referring to earlier, has there been any conviction of the person you are referring to ? Or you are privy to some super-secret information that the World is yet to know about ?
 
.
The question is, do you know how it works ?

The case that you had been referring to earlier, has there been any conviction of the person you are referring to ? Or you are privy to some super-secret information that the World is yet to know about ?

My friend a sitting Prime Minister was convicted, thats the highest office in Pakistan. Open your eyes, thats what I said, you need to be more aware .
Yousuf Raza Gilani is sent packing - Pakistan - DAWN.COM
"The Supreme Court on Tuesday declared Yousuf Raza Gilani disqualified from holding a seat in the parliament from the date of his conviction on April 26 by a seven-member bench for contempt of court."
Gilani contempt: Convicted - The Express Tribune
 
.
My friend a sitting Prime Minister was convicted, thats the highest office in Pakistan. Open your eyes, thats what I said, you need to be more aware .
Yousuf Raza Gilani is sent packing - Pakistan - DAWN.COM
"The Supreme Court on Tuesday declared Yousuf Raza Gilani disqualified from holding a seat in the parliament from the date of his conviction on April 26 by a seven-member bench for contempt of court."
Gilani contempt: Convicted - The Express Tribune

Hmm lemme answer your question, I don't see any difference between a person who blows himself to kill civilians and a person who presides over a mass murder of thousands of people, who are burnt alive, who presides over specific targetting of pregnant muslim women, whose fetuses are pulled out, tossed in the air, collected on swords and then burnt. Don't believe me internet is filled with first hand accounts and pictures of burnt bodies.
Its way more pathetic than being a terrorist !!!

Who is this person in bold you are referring to ?
 
.
Who is this person in bold you are referring to ?

So atleast you take back your first baseless accusation against independence of judiciary. A judiciary which can disqualify a sitting Prime Minister (highest office in a country) and convict him and disqualify him from being member Parliament is by all means independent.
Now, lets come to the second point, CM Gujrat , Mr Modi presided over those riots. Your own media showed footages of murderers admitting that Modi protected them and ordered those killings. When he was asked question about Gujrat by your own media, he left the interview, its all on your electronic media. When asked if he were the PM during Mumbai attacks what would he do, he replied "I'd do what I did in Gujrat"...what does these things mean, they are all available online, its clear even to a blind person that who presided over that genocide of muslims !!!
 
.
So atleast you take back your first baseless accusation against independence of judiciary. A judiciary which can disqualify a sitting Prime Minister (highest office in a country) and convict him and disqualify him from being member Parliament is by all means independent.
Dude, I was talking about Indian judiciary the whole time. Seems like we have a gross misunderstanding here. There was just one lingering question, whether you properly understand the process of conviction or not. I had to, I have encountered jingoistic youth high on adrenaline who think mob justice is the order of the day.
Now, lets come to the second point, CM Gujrat , Mr Modi presided over those riots. Your own media showed footages of murderers admitting that Modi protected them and ordered those killings. When he was asked question about Gujrat by your own media, he left the interview, its all on your electronic media. When asked if he were the PM during Mumbai attacks what would he do, he replied "I'd do what I did in Gujrat"...what does these things mean, they are all available online, its clear even to a blind person that who presided over that genocide of muslims !!!

The bold part, I want to see that footage. I am no blind Modi follower, but I like a few of his attributes. If you can share me that, then it will change my view towards Modi.

I'm not talking about the interview in which he left. A person can leave an interview for a number of reasons. If it was pre-decided not to talk bring up any particular topic and yet it is done, then it is perfectly right to walk out.

Now, riots happened people got killed, its a fact. I sometimes wonder, is it because of the Muslims that you get concerned ? Hindus got killed too. As a matter of fact, the riots started due to burning of a coachful of Hindus by Muslims. Did you not know that ? If yes, then why that part is missing in your earlier post ?
 
Last edited:
.
Back
Top Bottom