What's new

Pakistan cannot take Kashmir to ICJ: Sushma Swaraj

China has invested heavily in the diputed region and it will be fun if they bring this issue to the ICJ ...it will be fun if ICJ ask Pakistan to stop Chinese activities in Pakistani administered Kashmir
Lolz and you think icj will ask to stop development project rather then violence and open violation of human rights ?
It will be the last nail in icj's coffin :D .
.
( india dont let un observers to go to iok )
 
.
Quoting the text from the UN resolution:


PART I: CEASE-FIRE ORDER
A. The Governments of India and Pakistan agree that their respective High Commands will issue separately and simultaneously a cease-fire order to apply to all forces under their control and in the State of Jammu and Kashmir as of the earliest practicable date or dates to be mutually agreed upon within four days after these proposals have been accepted by both Governments.

B.The High Commands of the Indian and Pakistani forces agree to refrain from taking any measures that might augment the military potential of the forces under their control in the State of Jammu and Kashmir. ( For the purpose of these proposals forces under their control shall be considered to include all forces, organized and unorganized, fighting or participating in hostilities on their respective sides.

C.The Commanders-in-Chief of the forces of India and Pakistan shall promptly confer regarding any necessary local changes in present dispositions which may facilitate the cease-fire.

D. In its discretion and as the Commission may find practicable, the Commission will appoint military observers who, under the authority of the Commission and with the co-operation of both Commands, will supervise the observance of the cease-fire order.

E. The Government of India and the Government of Pakistan agree to appeal to their respective peoples to assist in creating and maintaining an atmosphere favourable to the promotion of further negotiations.

PART II: TRUCE AGREEMENT
Simultaneously with the acceptance of the proposal for the immediate cessation of hostilities as outlined in Part I, both the Governments accept the following principles as a basis for the formulation of a truce agreement, the details of which shall be worked out in discussion between their representatives and the Commission.
A.

1. As the presence of troops of Pakistan in the territory of the State of Jammu and Kashmir constitutes a material change in the situation since it was represented by the Government of Pakistan before the Security Council, the Government of Pakistan agrees to withdraw its troops from that State.

2. The Government of Pakistan will use its best endeavour to secure the withdrawal from the State of Jammu and Kashmir of tribesmen and Pakistani nationals not normally resident therein who have entered the State for the purpose of fighting.

3. Pending a final solution, the territory evacuated by the Pakistani troops will be administered by the local authorities under the surveillance of the commission.


Just read the bold part and ask yourself...


And this is usually where I get banned...



Read the resolution 47 from UN website:

http://www.un.org/en/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=S/RES/47(1948)

Page 4:

A. Restoration of Peace and order

1. The government of Pakistan should undertake to use its best endeavors:

(a) To secure the withdrawl from the state of Jammu and Kashmir of tribesmen and Pakistani national not normally resident therein who have entered the state for the purpose of figthing and to prevent any incursion into the state of such elements and any furnishing of material aid to those fighting in the state.



You see, we have already done our bit. There are no non Kashmirs or Pakhtoon tribals anymore in our side Kashmir.

Before a referendum, Pakistan must evacuate the part of Kashmir it occupates according to the resolution.
If the resolution is ignored, I see no International Law that would award Pakistan
control over Kashmir, since International Law has very little to say about the creation
of new states.
There are no laws that say that people should have a vote on if they still want to remain
in a state or not.
I am curious what the arguments would be in front of ICJ?

This:

https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/paki...-icj-sushma-swaraj.500080/page-2#post-9548614
 
.
Then go to ICJ
Why don't you do it then? You seem to have it all figured out i guess.
You will get Kashmir, stop CPEC, strangle China and Pakistan.
As shrewd business as it gets. Much to your taste and liking.


Kashmir for us is a bilateral issue and we will find a solution with the BJP government who have stated recently that they have found a permanent solution for Kashmir.

Then go to ICJ
Lolz and you think icj will ask to stop development project rather then violence and open violation of human rights ?
It will be the last nail in icj's coffin :D .
.

( india dont let un observers to go to iok )
 
. . . .
ICJ is political organization ofcourse. We should still take it ICJ
 
. . .
Doesn't matter nor we care about ICJ.
we will take kashmir with the mercy Of Allah Almighty.
Once just we get a green signal.
 
.
Even if Pakistan takes Kashmir to ICJ. what are the basis... UN resolution? The ones that Pakistan does not adhere to itself...
Does India adhere answer is no simple if icj won't entertain Kashmir we will not listen or go icj for kalbhushan
 
. .
Read the resolution 47 from UN website:

http://www.un.org/en/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=S/RES/47(1948)

Page 4:

A. Restoration of Peace and order

1. The government of Pakistan should undertake to use its best endeavors:

(a) To secure the withdrawl from the state of Jammu and Kashmir of tribesmen and Pakistani national not normally resident therein who have entered the state for the purpose of figthing and to prevent any incursion into the state of such elements and any furnishing of material aid to those fighting in the state.



You see, we have already done our bit. There are no non Kashmirs or Pakhtoon tribals anymore in our side Kashmir.



This:

https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/paki...-icj-sushma-swaraj.500080/page-2#post-9548614

It is not enough to be satisfied that You met the requirements.
You also have to convince the UN commission, that You did.
 
. .
Read the resolution 47 from UN website:

http://www.un.org/en/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=S/RES/47(1948)

Page 4:

A. Restoration of Peace and order

1. The government of Pakistan should undertake to use its best endeavors:

(a) To secure the withdrawl from the state of Jammu and Kashmir of tribesmen and Pakistani national not normally resident therein who have entered the state for the purpose of figthing and to prevent any incursion into the state of such elements and any furnishing of material aid to those fighting in the state.



You see, we have already done our bit. There are no non Kashmirs or Pakhtoon tribals anymore in our side Kashmir.



This:

https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/paki...-icj-sushma-swaraj.500080/page-2#post-9548614
So Pakistan army is not Pakistan Citizen ? And what about those Punjabis that are settled there to dilute Kashmiri population?
Kuch bi... Kachin se bhi
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom