What's new

Pakistan Army Officially Inducted LY-80 MR-SAM System

Actually it is more equal to BUK M3

buk_m3.jpg


3508418_original.jpg


A Buk M3 TELAR vehicle is fitted with radar, missile erector and launcher, and friend or foe identification system. It is operated by a crew of 4. TELAR carries a pod with 6 containerized missiles. Such modular approach speeds up reloading of the vehicle. Also it is significant improvement over older Buk systems, that carry only 4 missiles


The intercepter is more similar to new 9M317M missile of BUK M3.

missiles.jpg


001.jpg33b326ab-ea56-4f00-8370-edfbc02463a7Original.jpg




No SARH missiles have a very very tough time intercepting a supersonic cruise missiles . Prove it otherwise

Both have their advantages, buk can move with armor while LY-80 can't do that, also Buk M-3 can hit 10km higher then LY-80 which makes it more capable against SRBM threats. While LY-80 can engage targets 360 degrees due to VLS configuration while buk can not do that.
 
LY-80 is also a Chinese made, Pakistani bought missile


Ly-80 range is 40-45 km.
never said that it wasn't. your post was implying that Barak8 is somehow purely Indian.
 
hope we will manufacture missiles in pakistan
 
Its max high altitude is 25 km where as Buk M-3 have 35km max altitude, so its not very good against BMs may be effective against SRBMs.
Buk M3 missile is semi-active guidance , while HQ16A is active/semi-active compound guidance. See the difference? Don't be picky man.
 
We need to go for HQ-9 and also should induct PANTSIR S2 and BUK M3


For that we need system which can move with attack formations like Pantsir S2

The new one will be called SM and yes PA and PN should look into Pantsir SM and Buk M-3 because both combined with current systems will be very good in providing cover to moving troops and ships with anti SRBM capability.

http://www.janes.com/article/64663/russia-s-pantsyr-sm-air-defence-system-ready-in-two-years
 
Excellent addition to Pakistan's defence. Once again the Chinese come good for Pakistan.

HQ9b has KKV warhead, you are done.

Sooner or later, we will integrate S400 tech into HQ9 series development. The hybrid will be a monster. Have you ever heard of HQ26 anti-satellite SAM?

One of the thing that excites me about whenever China produces a new weapon system is that in most cases with very few exceptions, Pakistan will eventually be in a position to access that technology. This relationship we have with China will always stand us in good stead when dealing with our adversaries. The other thing is, Pakistan, like any other country, has deals which are secret and never made public. Imagine what else Pakistan has received from China but will never declare or declare in a staggered way.
 
Congrats on the induction and I think maybe we could also consider HQ-17 system in the future as well!
 
never said that it wasn't. your post was implying that Barak8 is somehow purely Indian.
The LY80 version tailor made for Pakistan has 50KM range.
 
Its More Meant to Protect Pakistani Armed Forces rather than Just relying on PAF Systems , as the System can Move will Help Protect the columns which go deep inside enemy area from Ariel threats

You are right but its not as mobile as Buk M3 as it can not move with armour columns but it will be good to have for defending battlefield.
 
good development.. HQ-9 and Chinese ABM system should be next step..
 
Buk M3 missile is semi-active guidance , while HQ16A is active/semi-active compound guidance. See the difference? Don't be picky man.

Both have their pros and cons but for PA both are needed as role differs.

http://www.janes.com/article/64945/buk-m3-sam-enters-russian-service

The LY80 version tailor made for Pakistan has 50KM range.

Hope you are right but please source to stop trolls.
 
PLA using HQ-16.




Can you please translate it into English.
You can use Google translator, it's too long.
 
You can use Google translator, it's too long.

Doing it from cellphone is not that easy man.
 
Back
Top Bottom