It's a short term solution and really only applicable for the COIN ops Pakistan is undertaking. It's going to affect the mobility capabilities of the vehicle and is unsuitable in the scenario of conventional war fighting.
@DESERT FIGHTER
The Hamza armoured vehicle is a terrible design in terms of crew safety and accessibility. Not in terms of armour itself but crew access. Please see the story in this link for an idea of what I am referring to:
https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2010/jun/24/four-british-soldiers-killed-afghanistan
From the photos posted by myself and other members yes HIT have the ability to produced bolt on armour kits for the M113 but it is not standard issue service wide and troops are resorting to hillbilly armour.
When it was found US troops were having to do this in Iraq it caused a scandal in Congress that they were sending their guys out in vehicles not fit for purpose hence the subsequent MRAP Programs for the Marine Corps and Army.
The Dragoon vehicle is more an Internal Security/policing vehicle and Raad is a light recce vehicle. The Hamza 30mm cannon is not in service and was developed as an export product.
As
@fatman17 has mentioned the Italian VCC 2 vehicles is service have come with their additional armour upgrades which is an appliqué layer of steel and bolt on armour which has Israeli origins that the Italians made their own. It's the kind of solution that the army needs for its M113 fleet which comes back to my original point. Is there a long term plan to bring these APCs up to a better standard?