What's new

Pakistan, an international migraine, says Albright

smeaglegolum

BANNED
Joined
Nov 23, 2008
Messages
262
Reaction score
0
Pakistan, an international migraine, says Albright

Press Trust of India
Tuesday, December 02, 2008 2:56 PM (Washington)

Counting many elements, including terrorism and nuclear weapons, in Pakistan as causes of international worries, a former top US official has described the South Asian country as an "international migraine".

"...my own sense is Pakistan has everything that gives you an international migraine. It has nuclear weapons, it has terrorism, extremists, corruption, very poor and it's in a location that's really, really important to us. And now with this issue with India. So, I think that the current president and the current secretary of state, who's on her way to India right now, have a very big job ahead of them," said former Secretary of State Madeleine Albright.

"And I also do think that the next president and the secretary of state are going to have to pay a great deal of attention to that combination of issues, Pakistan, India and Afghanistan, that all fit together. That's very important to the United States," she added.

In the wake of current tension between India and Pakistan following the Mumbai terror attacks, Albright said that Pakistan President Asif Ali Zardari was trying very hard to deal with the issue.

"...there's an agreement that the Pakistanis understand what the issue is. I think that if we have clear evidence and intelligence that is one part of this. And that is the Achilles' heel of everything, which is whether you have actual intelligence.

"...I think that he is their president and he is working very hard to try to get control over what is a very difficult place," she added.

Responding to a query on a remark made by President-elect Barack Obama, at his press conference in Chicago, in the wake of last week's terror attacks in Mumbai, the ex-official also endorsed the stand of the incoming US president.

"I think that what President-elect Obama said about the fact that every country, under the United Nations, has the right to defend itself, that is absolutely true. But it's also true that they are investigating everything right now and that it is not appropriate for those of us that are not in the government to comment on this," Albright said on CNN's Situation Room programme.

"I think that sovereign nations obviously have a right to protect themselves. Beyond that, I don't want to comment on the specific situation that has taken place in South Asia right now," Obama had said when asked if India had the same right as he claimed his administration had in going after terror targets inside Pakistan with or without the permission of the government in Islamabad.
 
.
Pakistan, an international migraine, says Albright
Press Trust of India
Tuesday, December 02, 2008 2:56 PM (Washington)
Counting many elements, including terrorism and nuclear weapons, in Pakistan as causes of international worries, a former top US official has described the South Asian country as an "international migraine".

It seems to me, Mr. Smeaglegolum, that posting this article is somewhat of an "incitement" of your Pakistani brothers on this forum. Oh, Well. What else is new? Perhaps extra supplies of "Excedrin" should be shipped to all of the world capitals to counteract the outbreak of migranes.
 
.
Well I don't see anything wrong in it. There were at least two occasions of it being labeled as State sponsor of Terrorism, once in 1992 and then 1998. This was revealed by none other than Hussein Haqqani, the present Pakistani ambassador for US.

Here is a gist

U.S. came close to declaring Pakistan a "terrorist" State in 1992

Amit Baruah

Letter blamed Islamabad for supporting militants in India

# Letter talked of the complicity of ISI and Army in training terrorists
# Pakistan warned that it would be listed among State sponsors of terrorism
# A meeting in 1992 resolved to further cover "tracks of terrorism"

NEW DELHI: Proof is now available to support suggestions that the United States came close to declaring Pakistan a terrorist State in 1992, as Islamabad increased support to militant elements operating in Jammu & Kashmir.

Pakistani scholar Hussain Haqqani reveals that a May 12, 1992 letter from U.S. Secretary of State James Baker to Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif directly blamed Islamabad for extending support to terrorists operating in India.

Handing over the letter to Mr. Sharif, U.S. Ambassador to Pakistan Nicholas Platt also provided some "talking points," which are, now, in the possession of Mr. Haqqani, who had worked as Press Secretary to both Mr. Sharif and Ms. Benazir Bhutto.

Damning points

The "talking points" are damning. "We are very confident of our information that your intelligence service, the Inter-Services Intelligence Directorate, and elements of the Army are supporting Kashmiri and Sikh militants who carry out acts of terrorism... This support takes the form of providing weapons, training and assistance in infiltration ... We're talking about direct, covert support from the Government of Pakistan," Mr. Platt's written "talking points"stated.

Credible information

"Our information is certain. It does not come from the Indian Government. Please consider the serious consequences to our relationship if this support continues... If the situation persists, the Secretary of State may find himself required by law to place Pakistan in the U.S.G. [United States Government] State sponsors of terrorism list... You must take concrete steps to curtail assistance to militants and not allow their training camps to operate in Pakistan or Azad Kashmir," the "talking points" added.

In his book, "Pakistan: Between Mosque and Military," Mr. Haqqani referred to a meeting that Mr. Sharif presided over on May 18, 1992. "We have been covering our tracks so far and will cover them even better in the future," Mr. Haqqani, who was present at the meeting, quoted ISI chief Lt. Gen. Javed Nasir as saying.

According to Mr. Haqqani, Mr. Sharif agreed with this assessment and sanctioned a sum of $2 million for stronger lobbying efforts in the U.S. Foreign Secretary Shehryar Khan, however, disagreed with this assessment, the book said.

Note of discord

The Foreign Secretary said Pakistan would "probably be more successful by focussing on diplomacy and political action" in favour of the Kashmiris, instead of "setting off bombs."

At the same meeting, Chief of Army Staff Asif Nawaz said it was not in Pakistan's interest to get into a confrontation with the U.S., but "we cannot shut down military operations against India either."

Pressure off

The removal of Lt. Gen. Javed Nasir as ISI chief in 1993 took the pressure off Pakistan and the Americans backed off from their threat of declaring Islamabad a State sponsor of terrorism.
 
.
suggestion to mdm albright " take 2 aspirins and call me in the morning"
 
. .
She is a stupid lady for sure needs more then asprin needs mental help !! :disagree: :tdown:
 
.
The US is not a migraine for anyone though.... Left to your judgement.

I do agree, Pakistan is in a location that's real important to the US. Pipelines, pipelines.
 
.
Its probably good that Pakistan and South Asia are a migraine for the US and the West. Lets go to the root of the problem, diagnose it and then fix it. It will be good for all ;)
 
.
Back
Top Bottom