What's new

Pakistan agrees to free several Afghan Taliban prisoners

.
At least they sleep with women, your so called leaders do goats. And I prefer my women in miniskirts, instead of chained in the basement under a sheet.(yours...probably best to cover). Screw your medieval morals...

You should read that earlier post about singing Bob Marley's songs to a kangaroo. It applies to the poster you are responding to
 
.
US paving way for Taliban take over after withdrawal.

Why the heck US maimed its soldiers in the first place if at the end you had to bend over
 
. .
* Hitler
* Stalin
* Benito Mussolini
* Sohartu
* Kim il sung/King Jong ill
* Gen Franco
* Shah of Iran
* Husni mubarik
* Gaddafi
* Zayn bin ali
* Charles Tylor
* Zia ul haq
* Musharraf
* Than shwe

Some epic failures of DANDA which lead to millions of innocents dead in 60 years. Keep this DANDA to yourself, no thanks.

Husn-e-Mubarik was a failure? Zia Ul Haq was a failure? You really lost your head.

In the time of Zia-Ul-Haq not a single country had balls to say anything bad to Pakistan. Only Zia gets full credit for having best economy of all the times in the history of Pakistan. He gets all the credit to broke USSR.. You will not understand since you are a generation of Political Corrupt Era, how you will understand Stability of Dollar, GDA record which only Pakistan has.. Like here in Oman for one day Oman lower their flag in front of Pakistan, for a day when Zia visited Oman.
 
.
i have only one problem with him
his policies for afghanistan

His policy for Afghanistan Actually Saved Pakistan's Baluchistan. Otherwise USSR would have crushed Pakistan to get Baluchistan. Mainly Gawadar. Lastly Jihad against USSR was not his alone decision but also Turkey, KSA, Egypt, all were with him...
 
.
Husn-e-Mubarik was a failure? Zia Ul Haq was a failure? You really lost your head.

Both of them were western stooges and epic failures.

In the time of Zia-Ul-Haq not a single country had balls to say anything bad to Pakistan.

And that made Pakistan into a superpower or a country ruled by a mad dog? :rolleyes:

Only Zia gets full credit for having best economy of all the times in the history of Pakistan.

Because dollars and Riyals were pouring in from his masters, in Washington and Riyadh for using Pakistan as a hired gun to fight for THEIR interests.

He gets all the credit to broke USSR..

If, it wasn't for him USSR had no plans to invade Afghanistan, they peacefully wanted an exit to Karachi which bhutto refused to back off from and therefore Americans plotted with Zia to stage a military coup to oust a public representative govt.

You will not understand since you are a generation of Political Corrupt Era, how you will understand Stability of Dollar, GDA record which only Pakistan has..

That is because BHEEK was pouring in, from his masters which may have artificially inflated figures. Pakistan wasn't building rocket ships. All, Zia gave us is, dictatorship, 7 million refugees, drugs and Ak-47s, started a war which we didn't have to fight and yes his biggest gift, the Salafist Islam. -- Americans disposed him after using him like a toilet paper.

Like here in Oman for one day Oman lower their flag in front of Pakistan, for a day when Zia visited Oman.


Historically, one dictator has respected another dictator.
 
.
Not unexpected of a regime running a dead F. Policy.

Karzai was sucking up Manmohan's hairy balls the same day his N. alliance Army bombed Pakistani villages and sent his "peace negotiator" to Pakistan and we decided to release people that matter to them without any horse trading. Very well !

I think we can release these terrorists, and while they are going to their Karzai father, Pakistan Army should drop an artillery shell or two on them.
 
. .
His policy for Afghanistan Actually Saved Pakistan's Baluchistan. Otherwise USSR would have crushed Pakistan to get Baluchistan. Mainly Gawadar. Lastly Jihad against USSR was not his alone decision but also Turkey, KSA, Egypt, all were with him...
come on we had US back then
it was not like they were gonna march on balochistan after getthing afghanistan
 
.
well how about tracking them ? Are our intelligence agencies not capable of fitting in chips in parts of the body without their acknowledgement? as we hear or see in movies ??

or is it only just a myth ?
 
.
come on we had US back then
it was not like they were gonna march on balochistan after getthing afghanistan

We also had US in 1971, and till the end we had only words that F-16 gonna fly to help Pakistan but it didn't. And USSR actually thought they will simply march away on baluchistan after easy take-over on Afghanistan... But Zia came in the middle... and In the end there was no USSR Left.
 
. . .

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom