Path-Finder
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2013
- Messages
- 24,393
- Reaction score
- 1
- Country
- Location
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes, at this point I don't believe an escalation needs to occur. It's enough that Pakistan has formally issued a protest and disagreed with the language. If need be, SMQ can do a typical SMQ style press conference and say something along the lines of 'the transcripts and audio of the conversation are available for the State Department to review if they need clarification of Pakistan's position'. I would be surprised and disappointed if the actual audio was released at this point without US agreement.Bro,
Do you think diplomatic protocol matters anymore in the light of this scandal? Either we take the matter to its logical conclusion or not bother.
If the objective is to embarrass US; then do it in full capacity. Show to the world what IK is all about.
FO have created this scene.
State Department is not budging from its official statement. Now what?
The last thing needed right now is to get into a pointless tit for tat or to engage the US government on Twitter.Yes, at this point I don't believe an escalation needs to occur. It's enough that Pakistan has formally issued a protest and disagreed with the language. If need be, SMQ can do a typical SMQ style press conference and say something along the lines of 'the transcripts and audio of the conversation are available for the State Department to review if they need clarification of Pakistan's position'. I would be surprised and disappointed if the actual audio was released at this point without US agreement.
And with respect to whether it should have, as I said before, the Pakistani protest needed to occur to ensure that the US also understands that Pakistan is not going to let even things like the wording of a statement go by unchallenged, if Pakistan disagrees.
So she stands by their read out...However, what she read for the journalists didnt include anything to do with terrorists....Meaning they are sidelining it and letting it slip pretending it is there (in imagination) and winding it up as a "read out"
The individual is a rep of theirs, If you didn't already know!!Calling out a lie is creating a scene?
You'd rather believe US State Department over our FO! Bear in mind this is the country that lied about WMDs to the whole world!
Who is paying you?
@LeGenD you seriously think I am an idiot who is going to take you babbling watch the video below lol.
@AgNoStiC MuSliM
Please watch the video below and tell me what is happening this is so embarrassing for USA.
The Tweet and statement both missed the word terrorism some how. LolBlatantly side stepped it and also not willing to further clarify and by just saying we stand by our press release shows from her face they are lying and incompetent lol
You really don’t need to go furher beyond that to know that what comes next from that person about Pakistan will be vile hatred filled nonsense.The indian guy (Aditya Raj Kaul) who has quoted this
yup her face said more than the stupid readout!Blatantly side stepped it and also not willing to further clarify and by just saying we stand by our press release shows from her face they are lying and incompetent lol
yea like I said he is relying on people who didnt / dont/ wont watch the video hence he can write anything with the blonde bimbo's video running as background noise!You really don’t need to go furher beyond that to know that what comes next from that person about Pakistan will be vile hatred filled nonsense.