What's new

Pak probably most dangerous country for world: Ex-CIA official

i agree with your post generally but wish to make a point about the underlined words... there are many people in usa who want a politically and economically progressive society, and that includes the citizens' movement "occupy"... these progressive people should be supported from outside so that they can take over the control of usa.
the general observation is trying to obfuscate the OP, by bringing in cuckoo dictator rhetoric... It's quite a subtle way of defending pakistan. good job....
 
.
i have said in one of my earliest posts from last year that i wish for a post-religion post-money communist humanity...
get real, not happening in our lifetime, or for the next generation, as far as I can foresee.

neither i want ancient jewish laws nor do i want modern saudi laws nor be seeing through ku klux klan glasses.
that makes 2 of us

is that the eastern part?? do i see bangladesh too?? :)
no, you see Rajasthan to the far side, bangla is over the horizon or not in range/focus.

what i want is this... :D

world-jamahiriya-jpeg.263563



world jamahiriya, and progressively without religious laws tying up people's minds until all old religions are considered abolished, like i said in the first line of this post... jamahiriya political arrangement plus modernized socialist social structure is the way to the idealized true communist state of humanity.
:suicide:

as far as i remember, you used "medical unit" by way of explaining away presence of indian military there... the indian member, doppelganger, is a doctor training within a army college i think and he said once that they receive proper military training.

if you have actually said something else, do say it again here.
yes, medical unit, we had as much of a role to play in Korea as Japan, with their pacifist constitution, had in Iraq in 03.

the article from wsws clearly said that indian army top brass were waiting for the american government to send details of how those 17,000 soldiers from india would operate within the "coalition of the willing"

they did not go because of civilian protests... fair??
what article ?

and no, any foreign military adventure will be political suicide for any GOI, don't be stupid, it was never seriously on the cards.

examples??
didn't object strongly enough, fell for it.

well, even the "no" by russia and china ( and germany and france in 2003 ) did not stop nato/usa-uk actions, but saying "i abstain" is quite the same as "i agree" and i don't blame only the indian uno representative in this... pakistan and bangladesh governments too didn't take the right stand.
it might be hard for you to digest this, but Libya, Syria and the middle east really isn't our top concern, never were, never will be.

reality check, we're just not a big enough player, let Russia and the US have at it.:pop:

punjabi-%288%29.jpg
 
.
the general observation is trying to obfuscate the OP, by bringing in cuckoo dictator rhetoric... It's quite a subtle way of defending pakistan. good job....

see, this is why i dislike nationalists, with their strange logic and what not.

what article ?

this one which i had posted in that thread...

from ( Washington presses India to send troops to Iraq - World Socialist Web Site )...
President Bush and top US officials first made the proposal in early May when India’s National Security Advisor, Brajesh Mishra, visited Washington. The issue was subsequently discussed in the Cabinet Security Committee (CCS) twice in May but no decision was taken. Instead New Delhi sought further clarification about its proposed role in Iraq and the command structure under which its troops would operate


and i found this too ( Pakistan delays sending troops to Iraq - World Socialist Web Site ), which really portrays what weak-minds south asian governments are and always oriented west.
 
. .
pak-nuclear-missiles_cc62b022-6e71-11e5-9358-ce0f694bc37c.jpg

Pakistan is estimated to have an impressive nuclear arsenal of 100-120 nuclear warheads. (AFP File Photo)

Pakistan is probably the most dangerous country for the world as it is ripe with the threats of terrorism, a failing economy and the fastest growing nuclear arsenal, a retired CIA official said.

“While Pakistan is not the most dangerous country in the world, it is probably the most dangerous country for the world, and as such, a serious case for close and continued US engagement with Pakistan can be made,” Kevin Hulbert, a former top intelligence officer who retired in June 2014, wrote in an op-ed in The Cipher Brief.

“As a country ripe with the triple threat of terrorism, a failing economy, and the fastest growing nuclear arsenal, Pakistan has the potential to create more nightmare scenarios for US policymakers than any other country,” said Hulbert, who previously served multiple overseas tours as CIA chief of station and deputy chief of station.

Like it or not, Pakistan is similar to a bank or company considered too big to let fail because of the ripple effect it might cause across the entire economy.

The spectre of the sixth largest country in the world being a failed state is a hypothetical catastrophe that would unleash a world of unintended consequences, he said.

“Rather than risk it, and as much as we might like to move on, we really should increase the level of engagement with Pakistan, not decrease it,” he recommended.

Hulbert said many of the trend lines in Pakistan now seem to be moving in the wrong direction.

For years, Pakistan felt justified in its use of jihadist militias to attack India in a war of attrition.

It pursued a perverse double-dealing game where they supported ‘good’ radical Muslim extremists that helped them in their proxy war against India, while at the same time trying to hold the line against the ‘bad’ radical Muslim extremist elements who focused on bringing down the Pakistani state, he observed.

A large percentage of the Pakistan population does not view jihadi groups, including the Taliban and other militant religious groups, as dangerous elements, but rather as good soldiers of Islam comprised of men performing their religious duty, he said.

“The fight against al Qaeda in Pakistan was largely seen as a US fight, not a Pakistan fight, and Pakistan’s unwillingness to make the hard choices required to confront the growing menace of radical extremism, created a monster,” the former CIA official said.

Today, Pakistan finds itself in a very complicated security situation where there is little differentiation among radical groups, he noted.

Terrorist groups, such as Lashkar-e-Taiba, are suddenly allied with al Qaeda, while Lashkar-e-Jhangvi, the Pakistan Taliban, the Afghan Taliban, and other assorted miscreants and non-state actors are intent on bringing down the elected government of Pakistan.

While the Pakistan government dithered, the militancy in the country took firm hold, he said.
Pak probably most dangerous country for world: Ex-CIA official | world | Hindustan Times

Not probably we are for sure the most dangerous country and nation in the world.

No wonder from India till Israel cowards dream of getting banged by us some day and are sleepless so all the propaganda and truth distortion.

But when the time will come we are not going to forgive india this time she will pay heavily and we will make sure she bleeds from all holes.

When it comes to courage and love of Shahadat for his motherland endians are no match for Pakistanis:pakistan:
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom