PAF Hero Who Violently Rattled The Indians

[Ultima Thule]

"In fact, it is very likely, as discussed on this forum, that following the retaliatory strikes across the border Pakistan conducted a test of the Raptor 3"

I did not say it was used on the 27th, but during a test following it (learn to read)....the video and its discussion is available here on pdf. I will not be entertaining you any further.

Another useless post by you why do you they tested Raptor-3 directly in real war situation, if some one say here it might be wrong first you test new weapons on testing ground/range to eliminate weakness/drawbacks of new weapons it commonsense and logical idea, if you have the discussion and videos of RAPTOR-3 test here on PDF, then please share the links thank you @valkyr_96

 

[MIG21DOWN]

Why does south africa have such impressive military research. They dont even have an enemy. Or is from the colonial period?

 

[Bossman]

Very good. But the people who designed these accurate and highly advanced weapons that can rattle up the enemy with one touch button should also be recognised and awarded.

South Africans

 

[valkyr_96]

Another useless post by you why do you they tested Raptor-3 directly in real war situation, if some one say here it might be wrong first you test new weapons on testing ground/range to eliminate weakness/drawbacks of new weapons it commonsense and logical idea, if you have the discussion and videos of RAPTOR-3 test here on PDF, then please share the links thank you @valkyr_96

You are seriously lacking in comprehension skills.IT WAS A TEST NO WHERE I HAVE SAID OTHERWISE and IT WAS LIKELY A RAPTOR III. I get it you are the village idiot who needs to spoon fed everything. The search bar was right there. Anyways https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/paf-...range-smart-weapon-from-jf-17-thunder.607541/

 

[James David]

Meanwhile in India they are awarding the dude who got shot down with...

 

[untitled]

Meanwhile in India they are awarding the dude who got shot down with...

Their country their misrule

 

[Myth_buster_1]

TOT means nothing to do with research and development/manufacturing conducted by Pakistan rather then in South Africa (innovation/improvement) there is no Raptor-3 in Pakistan you're just assuming, only REK for JF-17 and H-2/H-4 for Mirages based on Raptor-1/2, if they were tested your imaginary Raptor-3 or i assume H-6, then first they test in a testing range/ground rather then used this your proposed weapons/glide bombs in real war situation @valkyr_96

lets be honest, H2 H4 are South African export variants of glide bombs manufactured in Pakistan.

Here is a picture of H-4 rocket booster that was found in a field somewhere in kashmir

and here is a raptor II

 

[Ultima Thule]

You are seriously lacking in comprehension skills.IT WAS A TEST NO WHERE I HAVE SAID OTHERWISE and IT WAS LIKELY A RAPTOR III. I get it you are the village idiot who needs to spoon fed everything. The search bar was right there. Anyways https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/paf-...range-smart-weapon-from-jf-17-thunder.607541/

Wow what a prove your have its not a GLIDE BOMB but a rocket powered smart munitions and second its not tested in real war situation (27 FEB air strikes) as you claim, AND THIS TEST HAD BEEN ACCRUED AFTER 27 FEB AIR STRIKE, it tested in the testing range/ground somewhere in the country and last do you knows that what's is difference between GUIDEDD GLIDE BOMBS and ROCKET POWERED SMART MUNITIONS
GLIDE BOMB MEANS IT HAS NO PROPULSION UNIT IN IT AND TRAVEL THROUGH WITH ITS MOMENTUM PROVIDED BY ITS LAUNCH AIRCRAFT @valkyr_96

 

[sparten]

Yes but then the Israeli 'Spice 2000' are meant to be just as accurate and deadly but in the wrong hands, they proved to be nothing more than a DRDO product....so it's also the man behind the trigger that matters.

Spice 2000 is basically a REK dude. H4 is another league.

 

[Ultima Thule]

lets be honest, H2 H4 are South African export variants of glide bombs manufactured in Pakistan.

Here is a picture of H-4 rocket booster that was found in a field somewhere in kashmir

and here is a raptor II

I ALREADY TOLD YOU SIR H-2/H-4 ARE BASED ON REPTOR 1/2 but as @valkyr_96 claim that we weren't use H-1/2 at 27 FEB air strike but tested REPTOR-3 in 27 FEB air strike @Myth_buster_1

 

[valkyr_96]

I ALREADY TOLD YOU SIR H-2/H-4 ARE BASED ON REPTOR 1/2 but as @valkyr_96 claim that we weren't use H-1/2 at 27 FEB air strike but tested REPTOR-3 in 27 FEB air strike @Myth_buster_1

We did not test, what is likely, raptor III during the 27 Feb strike but after it Dumdum. I have even given the link to the discussion (with the footage) here on pdf (post #19) . Go learn some English.

 

[Ultima Thule]

We did not test, what is likely, raptor III during the 27 Feb strike but after it Dumdum. I have even given the link to the discussion (with the footage) here on pdf (post #19) . Go learn some English.

And go read this thread you will know this is not a glide bomb but rocket powered smart munitions i already explain that and as per DGISPR press conference we used glide bomb not rocket powered smart munitions, and tell me how they captured impact site with ground camera recording the detonation of this rocket powered smart munitions did India plant a camera to record the impact site if so why they release this footage,you lack logic and commonsens @valkyr_96

 

[Dazzler]

H4 is Raptor 2+ some indigenous improvisations.

 

[notorious_eagle]

@denel

I thought you could appreciate this pilot that delivered what you worked on with a bulls eye.

H-4s are designed and manufactured in Pakistan.

They were designed in South Africa, multiple indigenous modifications were made to increase their lethality and they are manufactured in Pakistan.

 

[war&peace]

@denel

I thought you could appreciate this pilot that delivered what you worked on with a bulls eye.



They were designed in South Africa, multiple indigenous modifications were made to increase their lethality and they are manufactured in Pakistan.

Sir, I know a lot of details but I don't want to go into details except it was acquired on full tot and it was in fact the first major project of the organisation that started with it and it was has been modified.
Acquiring any with ToT does not mean it is a walk in the park. Many ToT around the world have resulted in failure for example Agosta-90B's case. Producing the product with exacting details and hence improving it in terms of range, functionality and accuracy are not a minor feat for a small team.