Here's where we differ. If the Mods agree, I am happy to discuss this threadbare with you, after finishing the really nice thread that I am committed to.
I don't really like to discuss these topics (I have better things to do then discuss what sluts
really want) as it gets everyone's panties in a bunch for no reason. Where have I been wrong? Well you tried to raise some points so let me answer them.
I question your suggesting that there are limits for 'good' women, meaning that you have some objective critieria for judging good and bad.
Yes, there are rules that all good women should adhere to. I didn't make them, and they exist in all countries including the United States. Sure there are a few loud feminists who make the ridiculous argument that all sex is rape, and there are the men who enable these loudmouths.
But a good woman shouldn't cross a certain line.
Going to a man's room in a hotel alone, and spending whole night there definitely falls under that category. If she's been fornicating of her own free will, then she should not cry "rape rape" at the same time, just because she got paid less or whatever reason (there's definitely some reason. The women never accuse you of false rape without a personal reason). No legal jurisdiction will buy her cockamamie stories.
I don't see why fornicating freely should render a person out of law, and why the provisions of the law should not apply to her and to her partner.
When did I say that? You're putting words in my mouth. Even a woman who's fornicating deserves legal recourse if she had been seriously injured by a violent man. Or if it was under coercion, e.g. a male boss forcing a female employee for sexual favours, and she stands at risk of losing her job for not acceding to his demands.
Every case is different. I personally judge women who cavort freely very poorly, but I don't mix my views with the legal system.
I don't see what legal disability a 'common whore' has, and what constitutes a 'special whore', or an uncommon one.
A whore is a whore. It was just an expression. She behaves like a sex-hungry slut, and later accuses the man of false rape. She's the lowest of creatures. But I never said that should make her suffer legal disabilities. T
he point is, she can't prove her imaginary rape stories in a court of law. End of story.
I don't see what right you have to cast insinuations about a woman who fornicates freely, just because you don't agree that you, as a male, can do that, but she can't. Nothing personal, please don't get upset.
It's OK. See above, a good woman should always know her limits, and not act like a cheap slut. If she is one, she is no better than a common whore. Period.
I don't see how the quantum of payment comes into the picture in a bail application, or how it comes into a determination of rape. I hope that you agree that a woman has the right to say no at any point in the interaction.
It's most likely an educated guess, maybe money was involved. But there may be other motives. Again, see above. No woman makes a false rape accusation unless she wants to extract something from the male victim.
don't see what tradition you are upholding here. Would you care to define what is good tradition and what is bad tradition? Would you endorse widow burning, or stoning a woman to death for adultery? Where would you draw the line, and who would have to empower you to draw lines between this regressive practice and that? And please don't answer by asking me to hypothetically put women of my family into a similar situation, because that chestnut has been burnt for too many centuries now.
Now this is where i have lost you completely. When did I say that I would endorse widow burning, or stoning a woman to death for adultery? I only said if a woman acts like a cheap slut, then she is a disgusting person, and deserves to be condemned for her cavorting. That doesn't mean I don't want her to be legally protected.
There is something fundamentally questionable in your attitude towards women. I hope you land up in Scandinavia, in Sweden, in particular, and find yourself in a relationship where you are not permitted to pee upright, but have to do that sitting down, as some traditions of the eastern world demand, and some social traditions under forming in the western world are beginning to seek.
I have been to Scandinavia. It's a hell-hole of uppity women, bra-burning lesbians, and whipped men with zero trace of masculinity. If I end up living there, I would prefer to be hanged for my views than become like them.
I'm not an American.
