There is little or no turkic genes in 95% Pakistanis.
Even if there were it does not mean they are descendants of turkic since in US 50% OF Blacks have 10% or more white genes but that don't make them white.
Surname dont mean anything as they are many Asians with Surname John which is an European name so anybody can choose any surname.
Most Pakistani generals are Punjabis.
Dumbass, you do realize that Mughals and other who ruled inferior hindus also had very little turkic/Persian genes, right?
Mughals for example intermarried with locals for
centuries!! They were indianized Muslims just like we Pakistanis are.
Who even talked about "genes" anyways?
Modern day Pakistan is a direct successor to Islamic rule in india....that's a fact that you are unable to deny or argue against. Hence you are bringing idiotic talking points like "genes" which do not even matter.
Genes of Aurangzeb were predominantly subcontinental, NOT predominantly Turkic (just as our genes are)!
Or you believe that Mughals were "foreigners" even after being completely Indianized for
centuries. Mughal empire was not like British empire. They weren't 'foreigners' like British. They settled, married, and died here and did not maintain any physical/cultural contact with their place of origin (Central Asia).
You think North indians are European foreigners with similar genes because afterall, Aryans came to india from European lands
Pathetic. Claiming the legacy of other distinguished races on the sole basis of religion. Name a great empire that originated from western punjab. The inhabitants of the land that now makes up Pakistan have perpetually kowtowed to either the Persians, Afghans, Delhi, Sikhs, Marathas, British, and now the US and China.
Read above, retard.
Distinguished "other races" lmfaoooooo!!
You were ruled by localized Muslims, not Turks sitting in Central Asia.
Mughals =/= British.