What's new

Outcome: China removes road-building equipment from face-off site

Kinetic

BANNED
Joined
Feb 12, 2010
Messages
11,200
Reaction score
-33
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/...t-from-face-off-site/articleshow/60262735.cms

@ashok321 @Areesh @Feng Leng @Han Warrior @Han Patriot and other cheerleaders.

The chinese side has given up and faced a humiliating defeat in the hand of India.

Outcomes:

1) India was there for two months stopping PLA to construct road on disputed territory, chinese could not do anythign other than crying.

2) Both sides withdrawn their troops and there will not be no road.

3) China and Bhutan continue to petrol the area as they claim. India will intervene if if the chinese back stabbers try to do it again.


Indian troops can swiftly intervene if China attempts to build road at Doklam again

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/...t-from-face-off-site/articleshow/60262735.cms
 
. . .
It's over now.. for god sake...:bad::girl_cray3:
Poor+dragon+everyone+wants+his+balls+_e1ca57ca7b29898189d786e688e0ead1.jpg
 
.
expectedly the Chinese MEA did not mention about the ROAD, the main cause of the issue in their statements. Cowards trying to hide it. :D

You can claim that we're coward to hide something or maybe we just do India a face saving favor by not explicitly clarify the content of the talk...you never know. :lol:
 
. .
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/...t-from-face-off-site/articleshow/60262735.cms

@ashok321 @Areesh @Feng Leng @Han Warrior @Han Patriot and other cheerleaders.

The chinese side has given up and faced a humiliating defeat in the hand of India.

Outcomes:

1) India was there for two months stopping PLA to construct road on disputed territory, chinese could not do anythign other than crying.

2) Both sides withdrawn their troops and there will not be no road.

3) China and Bhutan continue to petrol the area as they claim. India will intervene if if the chinese back stabbers try to do it again.


Indian troops can swiftly intervene if China attempts to build road at Doklam again

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/...t-from-face-off-site/articleshow/60262735.cms
first of all, backstabbers? They were never your allies to begin with, this was a dispute between Bhutan and China, which they came close to solving, before India intervened.

Second, I have yet to see an international source say that China has windrawn its building equipment, though it's probably true.

Honestly, this was the best case scenario for both sides. India withdrew its forces, which is what China wanted, and China halted its activities (at least for now), which is what India wanted.

All in all, crisis averted, though China seems to have come out slightly better, if international media is to be believed.
 
.
But you explicitly warned " NO TALKS " until India withdraws :lol:

Indeed, China has state clearly that we only talk on how Indian army should leave (through front door, back door or from behind :D ) and there is nothing to negotiate.
 
.
first of all, backstabbers? They were never your allies to begin with, this was a dispute between Bhutan and China, which they came close to solving, before India intervened.

Second, I have yet to see an international source say that China has windrawn its building equipment, though it's probably true.

Honestly, this was the best case scenario for both sides. India withdrew its forces, which is what China wanted, and China halted its activities (at least for now), which is what India wanted.

All in all, crisis averted, though China seems to have come out slightly better, if international media is to be believed.

Care to explain your source Bhutan came close to solving it when China was actually building a road in it?
 
. .
Indeed, China has state clearly that we only talk on how Indian army should leave (through front door, back door or from behind :D ) and there is nothing to negotiate.

IA left only after China assured that it will stop its road building, remove equipments to status quo. Our objectives were met and we moved first. And China moved next and maintains status quo. Both got what they wanted.
 
.
IA left only after China assured that it will stop its road building, remove equipments to status quo. Our objectives were met and we moved first. And China moved next and maintains status quo. Both got what they wanted.

There again it's just a speculation that China made such concession but Indian army left Donglang is a fact, so it's premature to claim that you have reached your objectives.
 
.
.
first of all, backstabbers? They were never your allies to begin with, this was a dispute between Bhutan and China, which they came close to solving, before India intervened.

Second, I have yet to see an international source say that China has windrawn its building equipment, though it's probably true.

Honestly, this was the best case scenario for both sides. India withdrew its forces, which is what China wanted, and China halted its activities (at least for now), which is what India wanted.

All in all, crisis averted, though China seems to have come out slightly better, if international media is to be believed.
Crisis not averted. MEA fooled IA into retreat promising falsely the Chinese will stop building roads. I guess MEA assesses IA chances of military victory at zero. IA is still drinking the Ganges water and believe they will win. So IA really believes China will stop building :rofl: and will take action as soon as they realize MEA fooled them.
 
.
There again it's just a speculation that China made such concession but Indian army left Donglang is a fact, so it's premature to claim that you have reached your objectives.

Lol then why should IA move out without assurances? Do you think India felt intimidated by your warning factory? There is a back channel diplomacy going on. And FYI why dont CHina foreign ministry mention we will continue to build the road? Cos its a face saving exit for both nations. And India offered it to China.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom