FairAndUnbiased
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Nov 25, 2011
- Messages
- 10,184
- Reaction score
- -1
- Country
- Location
I just want to communicate the following:
First point, people at state funds have a very long history of spending tremendous amounts of money on vanity projects that tend to close quietly after a few years.
Second point, the state of real part of microelectronics industry, the one that doesn't have the privilege to contend for 12 digit state loans, is far from stellar.
Third point, all of the above, and the last 20 something years rendered it all vividly that keeping doing things under the first point, doesn't improve things under the second point.
Whether it is middle income trap or not, we are not advancing anywhere if the real part of the electronics industry can't stand on its two legs.
This is not a call to throw money on one or another part of the industry. I want people to stop, and think about it. The nation is spending billions a year on something that doesn't work, and doesn't contribute a thing towards this goal.
When anybody here will be passing by Shenzhen, go to SEG plaza, or HQEW building 1 first floor. You will see what China's real electronics industry is.
Very glad that there is somebody with whom I can talk about the industry seriously.
I once too had ambitions for process engineering, but in the end things didn't work out.
I tried working in microelectronics instead, an offshoot of Sichuan SOE. They were making a fancy synchronous rectifier for use in "driverless" LED modules. It was a bitter experience, and I am not having any plans to return to it. Plain electronics engineering earn so far much better buck, and if I try really hard, I may open my own practice in the next 6-8 years.
Point 1: throwing money at the problem is the best way to generate demand. if you don't have it, customers can't demand it. I've been through this in talks with my boss before. We were talking about designing a customized wafer mapping system, for internal use as a pilot scale R&D/FA tool and to sell the service.
I asked, right now there isn't much demand for this sort of service. Do we really need this? My boss replies: if we don't have the equipment ready to go and with some demonstrations already done, how do customers know they want this service? if production team doesn't know we have this, how do they know that this test may be good for them?
if you will, look at US biotech. They throw billions away every year unproductively while the bloated health insurance system sustains them by draining wealth from the people. yet some say that this might be worth it for the tech lead that it gives US biotech companies and for the demand generated by the biotech companies for high end equipment i.e. reactors, analytical tools, chemicals, etc.
or look at US military spending. how much of that is profitable, how much of that is just state welfare, and how much of it is demand creation for high end capabilities?
Point 2: Process engineering is quite removed from the electronics part. 90% of my work is chemistry and chemical engineering. My degree/research is in chemical physics so this works for me. But for fun, I just tinker with electronics using my own money. It is a cheap hobby compared to expensive ones like gambling or cars. Maybe one day I will start a business too, but I still think I need more experience and finding the market niches.