What's new

Operation Falcon: When Gen Sundarji Took the Chinese By Surprise

.
6_img11717094754.jpg

The PLA spokesman’s response in relation to the current India-China standoff, that India should not forget the lesson of history, suggests that the PLA itself may have forgotten some.

True, in 1962, the PLA roundly defeated the Indian Army. But in border skirmishes in 1967 in this very region, and in 1986-87, the Indian Army’s power play so rattled the PLA that it sacked its Tibet Military District Commander and its Military Region chief in Chengdu.

In its own way, the present Chinese action in the India-Bhutan-China trijunction could well be an outcome of the event that many have forgotten. This is the conflict that developed in the Sumdorong Chu region, north of Tawang in 1986, and led to a major military push, Operation Falcon, led by the then Indian Army chief Gen Krishnaswamy Sundarji.


India’s Policy on China After 1962 War ::

The roots of the problem went back to the late 1970s, when India finished licking their wounds following the 1962 war. That had begun when Indian forces were ordered to cross the Namka Chu rivulet and evict Chinese troops from the Thag La ridge, also north of Tawang, which India believed was the true border defined by the McMahon Line. The Chinese reacted strongly and launched a major attack across the Sino-Indian border. The outcome was a defeat for the Indian Army, with some of the worst catastrophes occurring in this region.

So, there was a certain sensitivity when New Delhi decided in 1983 that it should once again adopt a credible posture in this area to defend the major monastery town of Tawang. Indian forces stayed south of Namka Chu, but an IB team began visiting Sumdorong Chu, a few kilometres east of the site of the first clash of 1962 on the far side of the Nyamjang Chu.

Both Sumdorong Chu and Namka Chu flowed into this north-south flowing river, the former from the east and the latter from the west. The team camped there through summer and went back in winter. They did so in 1984 and 1985, but when they went back in 1986, they found the Chinese there in force. The Indians protested in June 1986, but the Chinese insisted that the area was north of the “so-called McMahon Line.”

All this happened in the wake of the Chinese decision to do one of those foreign policy somersaults they periodically do.


China’s Demands ::

Till the early 1980s, the Chinese expressed their willingness to resolve the Sino-Indian border dispute by swapping claims, that is that India surrender its claims to Aksai Chin, in exchange for them giving up claims to North East Frontier Agency (NEFA, later Arunachal Pradesh).

New Delhi had rejected the offers when they had been originally made in 1960 by Zhou Enlai and then again by Deng Xiaoping in 1988 to External Affairs Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee in 1979.

So when, during the border talks of 1985, the Chinese suddenly took the line that there was a bigger problem on the eastern sector and only if India gave concessions there, would it be willing to offer concessions on the western sector, the Indian side was baffled.

Soon it became clear that the Chinese were upping the ante in the east.

The decision was taken, therefore, to shore up Indian defences in the region. As part of this, the Army devised Operation Falcon to enable it to move up to the border in quick time from their peacetime positions.


Operation Falcon ::

Since there was no road beyond Tawang, Gen Sundarji decided to use the IAF’s new Russian-made heavy lift AN-26 helicopters to air land a brigade at a place called Zemithang, south of the Sino-Indian border but 90 kms by road from Tawang.

The airlift took place between 18 and 20 October 1986, the dates fraught in Indian history as they marked the beginning of the Sino-Indian war 24 years earlier in this very sector. They took up positions on Hathung La ridge overlooking Sumdorong Chu along with three other key mountain features. In 1962, the Chinese held the high ground; this time, the Indians.

With China scrambling to rush forces to the region, both sides began a general mobilisation along the entire border. Here again, Sundarji had a few surprises.

Innovatively using the heavy lift assets, which included Il-76 aircraft and the AN-26 helicopter, the Army placed T-72 tanks and infantry combat vehicles in the Demchok area of Ladakh and northern Sikkim.

The Chinese fumbled for a response and subsequently, a 15 November flag meeting calmed things down a bit. But now, India decided to take the opportunity to convert Arunachal, which was a centrally administered territory till then, into a full-fledged state.


South Block Had Its Doubts ::

Now came the kind of bluster we are hearing again in June 2017, reminding India of the lessons of 1962. The supreme leader Deng Xiaoping himself issued the threat to teach India “another lesson.” But the Army held firm, though the civilian side got a bit shaky. On 4 December, Rajiv Gandhi learnt of the developments at the border at the Navy Day reception traditionally held at the house of the Navy chief. Alarmed, he asked Sundarji and civilian defence officials to convene in the South Block Ops room after the reception.

Sundarji told him that they were a result of a Cabinet Committee on Security decision in 1983 ordering the Army to take up positions that would enable the defence of Tawang. While the Army had gone about the process methodically over the past years, the politicians and babus had simply not paid attention.

There was a heated argument at this point, with some officials wondering whether the Army had exceeded its brief and whether it was really necessary to occupy Hathung La and the surrounding features. Sundarji riposted that in the Army’s professional judgment, it was.

And, offering them the pointer he was using, he said that if they wanted other advice, they were welcome to seek it. It didn’t take much to remind the officials that civilian interference in operational matters was what had led to the disaster of 1962 – they backed off.


Sundarji’s Chequerboard Exercise ::

Through the early months of 1987, the two armies faced off against each other across the border. In the Hathung La area, they were practically eyeball to eyeball. Sundarji now launched an Exercise Chequerboard to further strengthen the Indian posture all across the Himalayan region, including pushing the authorities to undertake a crash road-building scheme to complete the projects that had been in a limbo since the 1970s. It is another matter that many of them are still not complete.

The crisis played on till May 1987, when the External Affairs Minister Narain Dutt Tiwari stopped over in Beijing on his way to Pyongang. After his talks with his Chinese counterparts, the temperature in the forward areas began subside.

India’s decision to firmly deal with the issue had beneficent consequences. It opened the way for Rajiv Gandhi’s visit to Beijing in December 1988 and gave India the confidence to detach the issue of the border settlement from the need to cultivate better relations with China. Further, it got the Chinese to agree to an equitable regime of CBMs (confidence-building measures), which were eventually written up in an agreement to maintain peace and tranquillity on the border in 1993.

There was another interesting fallout of the visit – the Chinese were so impressed by Sundarji that they invited him to visit China.

They were curious to meet the person who had in the space of one year, shaken up both the Pakistan Army through Exercise Brasstacks and the PLA through Op Falcon, and led India into a military venture in Sri Lanka.


However, the government felt that the visit would be premature. Eventually it was General Bipin Joshi who became the first chief to visit China in 1994. After he retired, Sundarji too visited China.
 
. . .
What a sensational story :lol:, 1987 was only 8 years of Chinese economy reform, Supreme leader Deng had great vision for China, he wanted to reform Chinese economy before anything else, he had issued warning to teach India a lesson to conceal our weakness because we concentrated on economy and our defense budget was very low, if we can scare India off without a fight was the wise solution:lol:, at that time India had Soviets as alliance and they sold India the best weapon against China, your Mig-25 overfly Tibet that we don't even have descent weapon to brought it down...so we're just buying time.

But our patience did pay off, and caught India by surprise that now we're not only 4 time of India economy but our military budget is 3 times of India. In 2017 we have much to offer to Indian army think then as 1987 or before.
 
.
What a sensational story :lol:, 1987 was only 8 years of Chinese economy reform, Supreme leader Deng had great vision for China, he wanted to reform Chinese economy before anything else, he had issued warning to teach India a lesson to conceal our weakness because we concentrated on economy and our defense budget was very low, if we can scare India off without a fight was the wise solution:lol:, at that time India had Soviets as alliance and they sold India the best weapon against China, your Mig-25 overfly Tibet that we don't even have descent weapon to brought it down...so we're just buying time.

But our patience did pay off, and caught India by surprise that now we're not only 4 time of India economy but our military budget is 3 times of India. In 2017 we have much to offer to Indian army think then as 1987 or before.

If there is no actual conflict, India will be the winner as Indians can out debate anyone.

This is the real strength if India, its debating skills.
 
. .
They need sensational story to boost their moral after 1962 :cool:

It's actually China who needs some moral boosting after the 1967 brutal thrashing by us, and then again getting caught pants down in 1986-87. Our moral is very high and we have done what we had to do, we have stopped the road construction, now show us what you can do about it for real...Enough of warnings...Enough of barking and passing hot air...Show us if the paper dragon has balls too. :)
 
.
It's actually China who needs some moral boosting after the 1967 brutal thrashing by us, and then again getting caught pants down in 1986-87. Our moral is very high and we have done what we had to do, we have stopped the road construction, now show us what you can do about it for real...Enough of warnings...Enough of barking and passing hot air...Show us if the paper dragon has balls too. :)

67 ->Proof? :lol: and keep repeat your fantasy to escape your 1962 humiliation :cool:
 
.
67 ->Proof? :lol: and keep repeat your fantasy to escape your 1962 humiliation :cool:

We are not responsible for lack of knowledge among chinese kids, nor we are their private tutors that we have to keep feeding them with knowledge. Your Beidu or whatever state controlled search engine won't show these information, use Google or bing or duckduckgo or any other real search engine and look for yourself.

But the point is, china is proving itself to be a paper dragon....but don't worry, we knew that for long.
 
.
We are not responsible for lack of knowledge among chinese kids, nor we are their private tutors that we have to keep feeding them with knowledge. Your Beidu or whatever state controlled search engine won't show these information, use Google or bing or duckduckgo or any other real search engine and look for yourself.

But the point is, china is proving itself to be a paper dragon....but don't worry, we knew that for long.

Keep calling us a paper dragon wont get your 1962's trauma away.
 
.
Keep calling us a paper dragon wont get your 1962's trauma away.

We don't underestimate China. We never will. period.
But, China Should also understand this is NOT SCS.

I strongly feel all this is just a kind of "Hit & Trial" as both sides have a lot to loose "economically" and both nations are mature enough to understand this ( Hint : Chinese now talking about Panchsheel .. lol )
 
.
Do you know why we dont want to fight india?
1.India just like a dirty beggar.even if we win, the beggars will mess us up and make us sick.
2.We don't want a third party to see a joke because we fight with a beggar.
But when beggars are constantly defiant and nauseous, we also kick their butts.
 
.
Keep calling us a paper dragon wont get your 1962's trauma away.

Actually 1962 did a lot of good for India, Indian leadership could shed its utopian Gandhian worldview of non-violence, Nehru could get over his belief that India doesn't really need a military, all it needs is a police force, and propelled India to become one of the strongest militaries in the world. That helped India win 1965 war against Pakistan and protect its sovereignty, win 1967 war against China and welcome Sikkim in Indian union, it helped India win 1971 war with Pakistan and split it into two, and put herself in the leadership position in South Asia.

It's China that axed its own legs with a ill-thought out 1962 war, it completely eroded previous Indian belief that China is a friend, and China got a big power in the neighborhood as its enemy. You think a trade off for Pakistan at the cost of India helps China in the long run?

Finally, we won't back down in the current border fiasco as it hurts our national security, if China choose to escalate it further, then we will fight it out. Now the ball is in your court, and warnings won't help.
 
.
There is no AN-26 helicopters
You are refering to Mi-26 helicopters
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom