What's new

Operation 'Decisive Storm' | Saudi lead coalition operations in Yemen - Updates & Discussions.

Apologies if posted before
http://english.alarabiya.net/en/New...s-FM-calls-for-Arab-ground-intervention-.html

"Asked in interview by Al Arabiya News Channel’s sister channel Al Hadath whether he sought Arab ground intervention, Riad Yassin said: “Yes, we are asking for that, and soon as possible, in order to save our infrastructure and save Yemenis under siege in many cities."

Yassin also revealed that Yemeni President Abdrabbu Mansour Hadi will be officially asking to join the Gulf Cooperation Council within the coming days"
 
But why not give their F-5s free of cost to Jordan?

I think Jordan doesn't need the F-5s ,because they are already operating F-16.They need more advanced one.In the short run , F-5 will be a scrap because its spares won't be available much more rather than it will be as a flying coffin due to the technical /mechanical failures . :D

So these were receiving Iranian weapons what is the Yemeni Army-Airforce-Navies were doing all that time and where are they now????

My friend, Houthis are just a tribe. The deep government controlled by the former president " Ali Abdullah Saleh " (which that mean airforce,navy,army all with him ) and Saleh is standing with Houthis .For that reason, Houthis are free to get/do anything because most of army with them .:-)
 
Yemen civilians shudder, bristle under bombing campaign
SANAA, Yemen (AP) - Yemeni civilians shuddered in fear and bristled with anger under an intense Saudi-led bombing campaign against Shiite rebels on Tuesday, day six of fighting that prompted international aid organizations to express alarm over high civilian casualties from the strikes and violence roiling the country.

Residents of the capital, Sanaa, sought shelter and got little sleep during the night, while some took to the rooftops in anger or frustration, firing automatic rifles skywards toward the roar of warplanes. Schools, universities and government offices were all closed, along with most shops. Few cars ventured onto the mostly deserted streets.

"We haven't slept - one child screams and a second cries," said Mustafa al-Ahmadi, a father of eight who said the family seeks shelter in their basement when close explosions rock the house. "Once it's quiet, we return to our room but the minute we step in, a second explosion rocks the house so we return to the basement. This is how we spend the night, running back and forth."

Late on Tuesday night, Yemeni military officials said the Shiite rebels, known as Houthis, took up positions overlooking the strategic Bab-el-Mandeb strait, which serves as a gateway for oil tankers headed to Europe, raising the risk they could threaten the key global shipping route with heavy weapons.

In what was likely the worst night yet for Sanaa, aircraft late Monday and early Tuesday repeatedly bombed a weapons depot in the southern Faj Atten neighborhood, sending an eruption of fire into the air and shaking windows for kilometers (miles) around.

Officials from all sides said strikes hit the city's so-called "security belt" of army camps surrounding the capital, some of which stored ballistic missiles. Those camps are held by the rebels or their allies, military units loyal to former President Ali Abdullah Saleh.

"We ran to the shop to take shelter after 1 a.m. because of airstrikes on the mountain," said Abdel-Rahman al-Hamidi, who lives near a rebel camp that was returning fire at warplanes. Many other shops are locked up with heavy metal chains.

The campaign by the Saudi-led coalition, made up mainly of Sunni Arab states, aims to weaken the Iranian-allied Houthis, who have overrun much of the country with the help of Saleh's loyalists and forced Yemen's current president, Abed Rabbo Mansour Hadi, to flee abroad.

The U.N. human rights office in Geneva said that in the past five days, at least 93 civilians have been killed and 364 wounded in five Yemeni cities engulfed in the violence, including, Sanaa. The overall figures are likely much higher and it was not immediately clear if the casualties cited by Geneva referred to just airstrikes or the strikes and fighting between Yemen's warring factions. The Saudi-led coalition says rebels have set up positions near civilians but that it is doing its best to avoid civilian casualties.

Overnight and into early hours Tuesday, the coalition also struck in and around the cities of Taiz, Ibb, Shabwa and Dahle and Aden, according to Yemeni military and security officials who spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to talk to the media.

The southern port city of Aden, a stronghold of Hadi supporters, has shaken for days by coalition strikes and by fighting between Hadi loyalists and Houthi-Saleh forces holding several positions in the city.

One resident, Ahmed Mohsen, told of a deadly blast he saw Monday, apparently from an errant shell in the fighting. "Several residents were sitting on the pavement outside, then suddenly we heard explosions and six people were killed," he said, adding that two others died of their wounds later.

Along with warplanes, warships and naval artillery were striking Houthi and pro-Saleh forces marching on Aden, trying to prevent them from reaching the city. Hadi had declared Aden the temporary capital of his government after he was forced to flee Houthi-controlled Sanaa. Last week, Hadi left the country for a summit in Egypt as fighting in Aden heated up.

Meanwhile, Iran said it sent an aid shipment to Yemen, according to the official IRNA news agency - Tehran's first such delivery since the airstrikes started. The aid contained 19 tons of medicines and medical equipment and two tons of food provided by the Iranian Red Crescent, IRNA said.

The agency reported that the aid was delivered by air early Tuesday but did not say where the cargo landed. The coalition has bombed a number of rebel-held airports and says it fully controls Yemen's airspace.

The conflict in Yemen marks a major escalation in the regional struggle for influence between Saudi Arabia and Iran, which also back rival sides in Syria's civil war. Critics of the Houthis charge that they are an Iranian proxy. Iran has provided aid to the rebels, but both Tehran and the Houthis deny it has armed them.

At night, Saudi warplanes bombed islands near the Bab-el-Mandeb strait and heavy anti-aircraft fire could be seen reaching upward into the sky, military officials said. They spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to release the information otherwise.

They say the rebels, which have been the target of a Saudi-led air offensive, are positioned in areas called Zabab and the Sheikh Said mountain next to the strait. International naval forces patrol the area and movement there has been normal.

From Riyadh, Saudi Foreign Minister Prince Saud al-Faisal insisted that Yemen's security was integral to the Gulf Arab region's overall security.

"We are not warmongers, but if the drums of war call for it, we are prepared," al-Faisal said in a speech to the consultative Shura Council. "The Houthi militias and the former president (Saleh), with Iranian support, insist on messing in Yemen."

Tuesday's statement from Geneva said U.N. human rights staffers in Yemen verified that at least 19 civilians died when airstrikes hit a camp for displaced people near the Houthi stronghold of Saada in northern Yemen, with at least 35 wounded, including 11 children.

The U.N. human rights chief Zeid Ra'ad Al Hussein on Tuesday said he was shocked by Monday's airstrike at the camp for displaced people and called on all sides to protect civilians from harm.

"The situation in Yemen is extremely alarming, with dozens of civilians killed over the past four days," Al Hussein said. "The country seems to be on the verge of total collapse."

The International Committee of the Red Cross on Tuesday called for the urgent removal of obstacles to the delivery of vital medical supplies needed to treat casualties.

Yemen civilians shudder, bristle under bombing campaign
 
We welcome the new flag between his brothers :enjoy: :


CBgiLKaWkAAo8cD.jpg:large











Didn't notice it ?
Ok. see the 3rd one from right :


:pakistan:
 
This goes both ways, doesn't it? Some hypocrites whining about barrel bombs, yet cheering when Saudis bomb Yemenis. Don't even try to play the role of passionate and caring guy here, that doesn't suit you.

Try not to make silly remarks like this if you're not prepared for an adequate response.
Saudis are making their Israeli counterparts proud:
 
There is a big difference between situation in Syria and Yemen. Syria is attacking rebels in Syria. Saudi is attacking rebels in Yemen.

No death is acceptable but foreign attacks on another country should be much more condemned as it leaves a bad precedent. It makes it okay for a country to attack another, but I guess in the middle east this has become the norm. USA can do air strikes on any middle Eastern country and Muslims are used to it. So I guess, this time, Saudi is saying, why let America have all the fun? Since no one cares, let me bomb Yemen directly myself.
 
This goes both ways, doesn't it? Some hypocrites whining about barrel bombs, yet cheering when Saudis bomb Yemenis. Don't even try to play the role of passionate and caring guy here, that doesn't suit you.
Agreed, it's a bitter complaint Zionists can sympathize with, for example when Israel attacks rocket-launching sites and their human shields get killed people talk about how terrible Israel is yet when al-Qaeda was barrel-bombed inside crowded Lebanese refugee camps the media crowd cheered.

No one is interested in peace-making yet: the Houthis are still reeling and the Saudis want to see how far they can be push. If Pakistan, as a Shia-Sunni state perfectly placed for mediation, still fielded capable, pro-active diplomats they might be able to initiate something useful but apparently such talent isn't there anymore.
 
Go first change your flag, Turkey didn't killed 200k own citizens so we can't compare Turkey with this thread:-). When israel killed 9 Turkish citizen ther was a chance for war against israel. Only what will happenwhen we declared war against israel? Would the arabs helping Turks against israel:-)? Would poorsians attacking israel when we declared war against israel?


Why send our troops against israel when the arabs are lacked against ther own arab people?


So pleas don't compare Turkey with garbage like your self.

Same BS line being used over and over......'killed 200k citizens' I guess AQ and IS taking over half the country have nothing to do with that. No need for war against Israel, but at least sanctions, suspending diplomatic ties or anything showing you have a spine. The truth is you couldn't do jack. Israel kills thousands in Gaza last summer and Turkey does absolutely nothing. But when it comes to Syria and Yemen, you are very proactive. Look at your hypocrisy, you are fine with FOREIGN governments bombing rebels in Yemen, but in Syria, rebels are OK and you condemn the LOCAL government for bombing. Nothing more can be expected from a dependent zog tool and nato vassal.
 
logo.png
Written by : Nasser Al-Haqbani
on : Tuesday, 31 Mar, 2015
Coalition warships secure Yemen ports: Saudi Defense Ministry
Ground operation by Saudi-led coalition against Houthis has not been ruled out

Saudi Defense Ministry spokesman Brig. Gen. Ahmed Asiri briefs reporters at the Riyadh Air Base, Saudi Arabia, on March 30, 2015. (SPA)

Riyadh, Asharq Al-Awsat—Warships from the Saudi-led Arab coalition targeting the Houthi movement in Yemen have successfully secured all the country’s ports, Saudi Arabia’s Defense Ministry said on Monday.

In his daily briefing to reporters, Defense Ministry spokesman Brig. Gen. Ahmed Asiri said coalition warships had implemented a sea blockade of all Yemen’s ports, cutting off all entry and exit points.

He added that the ongoing air campaign had also destroyed a cache of ballistic missiles and mortar bombs and destroyed a group of tanks the Houthis were moving toward the southern port city of Aden.

In addition to military supplies and equipment, coalition airstrikes are also targeting the movement of Houthi militias and leading figures within the movement, Asiri said, also adding that the air campaign would be intensified within the coming days.

In answer to a question regarding reports that coalition warplanes had accidentally targeted a refugee camp just outside Sana’a, Asiri said that coalition warplanes had come under anti-aircraft missile attacks from the area and were thereby forced to respond, adding that Houthi militias have been deploying their forces in a number of civilian areas.

“Coalition forces are working extremely hard to avoid these kinds of incidents and are working to accurately specify targets and make sure they are empty of civilians before launching any attacks,” he said.

The Saudi-led offensive, dubbed Operation Decisive Storm, is now in its sixth day, and involves aircraft and ships from a number of regional countries including Gulf Cooperation Council members Qatar, Bahrain, Kuwait and the UAE, as well as regional allies Egypt, Sudan, Morocco and Jordan.

Observers expect the air offensive could soon be beefed up with ground troops in order to fully quell the Houthi coup. Asiri did not rule out a ground operation.

He said: “When we need to introduce ground troops, we will deploy them accordingly and announce this openly—we have nothing to hide.”

In addition to Saudi Arabia’s Arab allies, Pakistan has also offered to join the coalition against the Houthis. Asiri confirmed Islamabad would be sending troops to the Kingdom to coordinate with their Saudi counterparts.
 
logo.gif

Should Pakistan be party to the Saudi-Yemen conflict?
By Talat Masood
Published: April 1, 2015
861968-TalatMasoodNew-1427820068-293-640x480.JPG

The writer is a retired lieutenant general of the Pakistan Army and a former federal secretary. He has also served as chairman of the Pakistan Ordnance Factories Board

There are contradictory signals regarding Pakistan’s involvement in the Yemen conflict. Going by earlier statements of Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif, one clearly got the impression that Pakistan has joined the coalition of the Arab states in fighting the insurgency led by the Houthis. This was further collaborated by the statement made by a Saudi minister that Pakistan has agreed to join the coalition. Reports appeared in the international media that Pakistani F-16s were seen in Saudi Arabia. To what extent are these reports authentic, only the government would be able to verify or we could get some definite information from other sources too, as something like this cannot remain a secret for too long. What is baffling is that a decision of this level is taken by circumventing the cabinet, and the national security and foreign affairs committee, and also while keeping parliament in the dark. It is only after opposition parties, the media and civil society expressed their strong reservations that there appears to be some backtracking. This was evident from Defence Minister Khawaja Asif’s statement that no final decision has been taken so far.

Look at the present predicament of Pakistan. It is guarding a volatile eastern border, is deeply immersed in fighting an insurgency on the western border, coping with sectarian killings across the country and combatting terrorist and criminal militias in Karachi and elsewhere. When the military is already stretched to its limits, it is dangerously naive to take sides and join the Saudi-led military campaign to dislodge the Iranian-supported insurgency in Yemen.

As it is, the Saudi and Iranian governments are fighting their shadow wars in various Muslim countries, including Pakistan, for several years. Any leaning towards one side will sharpen the sectarian conflict within our country. The proxies of these countries will ignite the flames of hatred, risking serious internal cohesion. A nation torn by sectarian divisions will find its resolve weakened in fighting the insurgency against the TTP, al Qaeda and their variants. Already, there are clear indications that the TTP and al Qaeda, by targeting Christian churches and by launching sectarian attacks, are provoking the communities that are targeted to retaliate, hoping that it would create fertile ground for a civil war. We tend to forget that as a nation we are far more diverse than either Iran or Saudi Arabia and being a soft state, we are vulnerable to the machinations of regional and global players. Taking sides will provide an opportunity for the Islamic State (IS) to make inroads in Pakistan.

There is no doubt that Iran’s influence has increased in the conflict-ravaged states of Iraq, Syria, Lebanon and Yemen. The Saudis are understandably nervous and are hoping that the alliance that has been forged will counter the growing Iranian military power and diplomatic clout. For us, both countries are extremely important. Saudi Arabia is our most important strategic ally, an energy superpower, the custodian of the holiest places of Muslims and leader of the Arab world.

Iran is no less significant for us. It is an important neighbour with whom we have religious, historical and cultural ties that bind us closely. In such a situation, taking sides could lead to serious consequences.

This is also a conflict where alliances are fluid and mostly tactical, formed to meet the immediate security challenge. Expediency and shifting dynamics have given rise to inconsistency in alliances and policies, with unexpected implications for the region. Iran is an ally of the US in Iraq and if the Iran nuclear deal gets through, it is likely that the wall that stood between them would come down. Arab countries and al Qaeda are on the same side in any sectarian conflict, but are otherwise, arch-enemies. Iran is backing the Houthis which are strong enough to overthrow the Yemen regime but do not enjoy enough support to rule the whole country. This, now, is the real challenge of the region, where foreign intervention, armed insurgencies or popular movements are capable of removing tyrants, but the vacuum that follows creates other monsters. The US policy was aimed at removing Bashar al Assad from Syria without determining what would follow his removal. Similarly, when Saddam Hussein was removed, Iraq paid a huge price in blood and money and has yet to recover. There is no doubt that most regimes in the Middle East are corrupt, inefficient and authoritarian, and have failed to serve the interests of their people.

To expect that the coalition of Arab countries, or Iran and its allies, will protect the interests of the ordinary people in Yemen will be a folly. In Yemen, a pure power struggle, which is combined with a reinvigorated manifestation of a centuries-old sectarian schism, is being given a sectarian colour. Even though the conflict in that country essentially consists of tribal alignments designed to gain power. It is not the first time that the Saudis have intervened in Yemen. They invaded Yemen in 1962, too.

Uprisings in the Middle East, whether led by the IS or the Houthis, are also an expression of the extreme frustration of the masses. The earlier Arab spring was a more modern and progressive movement, reflecting the same frustration of the people who were trying to define their new identity. The Arab spring was despised and opposed by the Arab rulers and was subsequently crushed. Egypt’s security establishment, Saudi Arabia and many countries in the Gulf were also very uneasy when the Muslim Brotherhood won the elections in Egypt. Ironically, this was the first time in Egypt’s history that a democratically elected government had assumed power. The situation in the Arab world today is caught between authoritarian regimes and disgruntled masses. Unless these regimes do not see the writing on the wall and adjust to the challenges of the 21st century and the aspirations of their people, alliances or no alliances, the region will be in turmoil and vulnerable to manipulations by outside powers.

To expect a lame-duck organisation like the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation to play any positive role would be unrealistic. A more rational approach for Pakistan and Turkey should be to jointly play a conciliatory role rather than take sides.

Published in The Express Tribune, April 1st, 2015.
 
Same BS line being used over and over......'killed 200k citizens' I guess AQ and IS taking over half the country have nothing to do with that. No need for war against Israel, but at least sanctions, suspending diplomatic ties or anything showing you have a spine. The truth is you couldn't do jack. Israel kills thousands in Gaza last summer and Turkey does absolutely nothing. But when it comes to Syria and Yemen, you are very proactive. Look at your hypocrisy, you are fine with FOREIGN governments bombing rebels in Yemen, but in Syria, rebels are OK and you condemn the LOCAL government for bombing. Nothing more can be expected from a dependent zog tool and nato vassal.

If asshead have listen to his people this wouldnt happen, when asssad begin to kill people no foreigner country helped the syrians. And then isis and aq came to syria, so what is the problem? You kill people that people kills you back. Aq and issis didn't killed more then 200k. Go compare things right.

Israel kills thousends and Turkey is the only one telling israel not to kill. What the fuk did you country do? No arab country in the world did what so why are trying give the Turks guilt:-)?

Americans tickle egypts against palestins, close the border so hamas weakens, And how much do you asssad lovers supported sisi against mubarak? The coupe of sisi is nothing more then safequard of israel. So go learn to understand the paradigm come talk about.


Yemen is a different story, the goverment didn't killed people, didn't toture people, didn't raped people, didn't bombed with barrel bombs. So can you see the difference or did you put your head in the ground?

images



So show us wher the Yemen state killed his people systematic like asssad?

New Yorkers see graphic images of torture victims in Syria | Daily Mail Online


Some syrian soldiers have fun...:-)















Now show us what kind of crime did Yemenite state do to thousend houthies and torture them? Give us a example why ther rebellion is justified? :-)
 
Last edited:
Yemen and Gaza: Why the Different Reactions?
by Elliott Abrams
March 31, 2015

The Washington Post reported this today:

An airstrike killed dozens of people Monday at a camp for displaced people in northern Yemen, in what appeared to be the single deadliest attack since a Saudi Arabia-led coalition sent warplanes to target Shiite insurgents advancing across the country.

As many as 40 people died and about 200 were wounded in the attack on the Mazraq camp in Hajjah province, said Joel Millman, a spokesman for the International Organization for Migration, which runs aid programs at the facility.

The Yemeni Shiite rebels, known as Houthis, accused the Saudi-led coalition of hitting the camp, located in an area under the control of the insurgents. Saudi officials did not confirm that. But, asked about the bombing, Saudi Brig. Gen. Ahmed Asiri, a coalition spokesman, asserted that the rebels were setting up positions in civilian areas and said that coalition warplanes had taken fire Monday from a residential area, forcing a “decisive response,” according to the official Saudi Press Agency.

So, taking fire from a civilian area in which shooters were hiding, the Saudis struck back. When Israel does that in Gaza, where it is the common practice of Hamas to hide in and shoot from civilian areas, and to store weapons in schools and hospitals (including those run by the United Nations), what happens? Israel is universally condemned. UN investigation commissions are appointed, and reports such as the egregious “Goldstone Report” (officially, the “The United Nations Fact Finding Mission on the Gaza Conflict”) are issued. The UN Security Council holds special sessions, and the UN Human Rights Council adds additional “hate Israel” meetings to its usual list.

I cannot recall an incident where Israel struck at a refugee camp and killed 40 people all at once, also injuring 200 others, but I am willing to bet on the world reaction to this Saudi attack: zero. No meetings, commissions, no reports.

What are the lessons to be drawn? That the Arab group and the Islamic nations have more votes in the UN than Israel, which of course has but one. That there is an indefensible double standard when it comes to evaluating Israel. And, that hiding behind civilians is a widespread crime. Nothing new here.

I suppose it’s too much to ask that if Israel and Hamas enter another round of fighting in Gaza, those countries who have joined together to suppress the Houthi rebels in Yemen might think twice before condemning Israel, and might even condemn Hamas for hiding behind civilians. But the almost certain silence in the United Nations about the attack on the refugee camp in Yemen is worth recalling the next time Israel is attacked for doing far less to protect itself. I don’t know the details about the Saudi attack, and perhaps it was carried out with care and precision. The point is, no one is going to bother to find out.

Opinions expressed on CFR blogs are solely those of the author or commenter, not of CFR, which takes no institutional positions.
 
Back
Top Bottom