Bang Galore
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 21, 2010
- Messages
- 10,685
- Reaction score
- 12
- Country
- Location
Agreements are signed between States, not Political Governments. Read up on that
Err...so what? Agreements cannot be broken? Think LoC violation in Kargil...LoC is a treaty, not just a line. In any case, non-state actors can always be used to up the ante if the political dispensation & army is not satisfied with the status quo. Why should India risk anything to be in a worse position than today?
If you think a deal could have been done, why should it matter who was in government in Pakistan or who the CoAS was? It remains Pakistan who pulled back, any deal done by Musharraf would probably have been repudiated & undermined & the Indian political establishment would have had egg on their faces for all the political capital that they had expended on such a deal.
Looks like you have been hallucinating
Ya, along with everyone else I suppose.....
UK saw Kayani as obstacle to Kashmir deal - The Express Tribune
"General Kayani had himself made no secret of the fact that Pakistan's Kashmir policy under his former boss General (retd) Pervez Musharraf would undergo changes as several events had led Pakistan to think afresh."
General Kayani major "obstacle" in almost done Indo-Pak deal on Kashmir - Yahoo News India
Last edited: