What's new

On why India remains only a superpower hopeful

INDIAPOSITIVE

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Sep 20, 2014
Messages
9,318
Reaction score
-28
Country
India
Location
India
Journalist-turned-author John Elliott, who tried dissecting India’s spurts of economic growth and tendency to fall short of emerging a global power in his book Implosion —India’s Tryst with Reality, believes Prime Minister Narendra Modi has been a disappointment in the first nine months in office delivering on his big promises.

In a freewheeling interaction with BusinessLine in Hyderabad recently, Elliott explained how people elected Modi to sort out problems of corruption and policy indecision and to usher in a strong federalism where States perform and contribute significantly to the nation’s rise.

Elliott’s take is Modi has raised high expectations. He has definitely refurbished India’s image abroad, especially with the G-8 by his new approach to foreign policy. But on the home front, he is found wanting. He is yet to get a grip on making India a better place to do business in, is yet to make a big-ticket announcement (except Jan Dhan) or create the promised jobs.

The muddle of coalitions that have been the norm for the past two decades is taking a toll on economic growth. In addition, the continuing cycle of State elections has not helped either. He thinks PV Narasimha Rao was the greatest economic reformer who lost his nerve during 1994-95. Atal Behari Vajpayee was a statesman. Narendra Modi, with his huge popularity and majority in the Lok Sabha, stares at a golden chance of correcting many of the country’s inherent deficiencies.

Drawing on his three decades of reporting on developments in India for among others the Financial Times, The Economist, and Fortune, Elliott veers pins India’s under-achievements on many fronts to two factors — Jugaad (quick-fix) and chalta hai (casual attitude). Despite having vast natural resources, over 65 per cent of its billion plus population being below 35 this mindset often derailed the country’s sustained growth.

The scribe in Elliott has extensively documented these maladies with examples in his award-winning book in its revised edition now. From chapters like Scam Andhra, documenting the Satyam episode to the rise of YS Jagan and the new infrastructure majors, to Manmohan Singh’s penchant to blame the compulsions of coalition politics in UPA-2 for policy paralysis, he turns a critical eye on them all.

The reason why corporate India backed Modi is not because of his ‘Gujarat Model,’ but because he was someone who could take decisions, like in Gujarat, asserts Elliott. Similarly, the youth placed their trust in Modi’s mantra of jobs and skilling. But, so far Modi has not delivered any of these, says Elliott. Except for opening up the defence sector for greater private participation or continuing with the Nandan Nilekani-driven successful Aadhar linkages, his stamp of boldness is not visible. Modi’s ‘Make in India’ plan is yet to take off, belying the youth’s aspirations.

On international perception of India as an investment destination, Elliott says India is a very welcoming nation. First impressions are of people very willing, hospitable and nice. Things change once investors start to put their money and turn to doing business. Therefore, India tends to get criticised for belying the initial welcome. The deep-rooted corruption, issues of violence against women and the rise of rightwing activism are doing huge damage to India’s image globally, rues Elliott.

Elliott’s updated edition is a no-holds-barred account of many things gone wrong in India’s economic growth, dynastic politics and casual attitudes.

The many anecdotes throw light on our dismal record on environment, land use, and other social indicators.

On why India remains only a superpower hopeful | Business Line
 
. .
Yes India has the potential and will to become a top nation !
 
. .
Maybe economic superpower in a few decades. But never a military superpower.
agree

this "superpower" thing gets tossed around all to often without thought, Indian people don't want that title either.. we're just a billion strong and all looking for a better future, so combined like that.. we are a "superpower", but not trying to be the next 'murrica/soviet union or anything...
 
.
Maybe economic superpower in a few decades. But never a military superpower.
Wrong Presently except superpower USA, china and Russia. India can give any nation Run for its money just take look at India GPI index of 2015.
 
. .
Whatever those Westerner authors say something won't change like Asia is going to be a major power house in 21st century, China and India are going to play a vital role in Asia development and finally Singapore is going to be beacon of Hope for all international transactions :P
 
.
Wrong Presently except superpower USA, china and Russia. India can give any nation Run for its money just take look at India GPI index of 2015.
Firstly, GFP is BS. India is not stronger than France or UK. India still purchases most of its advanced weaponry. Until a nation does not have to rely on someone else for its defence, it's not a superpower.

And do you know how much of a gap there is between the US and India? US leaves every country in the dust, it is the sole superpower. I don't see India overtaking the US in this century, nevermind this decade like some believe.
 
.
"On international perception of India as an investment destination, Elliott says India is a very welcoming nation. First impressions are of people very willing, hospitable and nice. Things change once investors start to put their money and turn to doing business. Therefore, India tends to get criticized for belying the initial welcome"

No comment!
 
.
agree

this "superpower" thing gets tossed around all to often without thought, Indian people don't want that title either.. we're just a billion strong and all looking for a better future, so combined like that.. we are a "superpower", but not trying to be the next 'murrica/soviet union or anything...

Than how can you explain the Indian superpower facebook pages or the Indian superpower movie. More Indians crave to be superpower than any other people.

Firstly, GFP is BS. India is not stronger than France or UK. India still purchases most of its advanced weaponry. Until a nation does not have to rely on someone else for its defence, it's not a superpower.

And do you know how much of a gap there is between the US and India? US leaves every country in the dust, it is the sole superpower. I don't see India overtaking the US in this century, nevermind this decade like some believe.

Well, some Indians would use the hare and tortoise analogy the describe US and India. In this case, India is the tortoise that never catch up to hare as no one is resting in their raurals as some Indians like to portrait.
 
. .
Firstly, GFP is BS. India is not stronger than France or UK. India still purchases most of its advanced weaponry. Until a nation does not have to rely on someone else for its defence, it's not a superpower.

And do you know how much of a gap there is between the US and India? US leaves every country in the dust, it is the sole superpower. I don't see India overtaking the US in this century, nevermind this decade like some believe.
India does purchase some advance weapons from even small
Countries like Sweden & Italy or Spain other's our much advance in technology from India due to they share same Technical advancement of military coalition of NATO and with US.
But power of the nation is depend on others factors as well Even UK & France combination cannot have superior resources thar of India they are limited by land resources and human resources and in a decade economic resources as well

Take a example of China in 90's. decades back they are not in league in Matching global power of NAtO & US but in just matter of two decades they proved others wrong
So your Myth that India cannot match US in this century is moot.
 
.
Robyn lawley is fat and ugly .
Than how can you explain the Indian superpower facebook pages or the Indian superpower movie. More Indians crave to be superpower than any other people.



Well, some Indians would use the hare and tortoise analogy the describe US and India. In this case, India is the tortoise that never catch up to hare as no one is resting in their raurals as some Indians like to portrait.

Dude look at that last few sentences .How these woman.issues find place in there?

Stupid.
Yes India has the potential and will to become a top nation !
 
.
Who invented this childish term? There are no real super-powers anymore as no one can dictate terms to the world ad get away with it. Those days of the cold war, where super-power actually mattered are long gone.

Heck, what is the super-power US able to do about Iran? Just look at how their won Senate made a joke of their Commander in Chief.

This does not mean there aren't huge variance between the power and significance of countries. Every nation works towards its own interests and India does too. As economy grows, so will the military might and with push for production and R&D in India, that might will be enhanced further.
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom