What's new

Old Photos of Pakistan

. . .
1427092027-277--c_e,g_nw,h_0,w_800,f_none,s_1--82b3148ecdca55e4b9018de3ae6072c1cde92dd7--.jpg

pakistan-railway-5.jpg

hop2013-40002_zpsf76a1d93.jpg
 
. . .
You can say pictures from British India (now Pakistan).
He can. All he has to say is "coterminous Pakistan" unless you have a aversion to the name Pakistan or have a secret longing for Mata India.

@Wolfhunter I would ask you with respect to please use "Pakistan" but so as to relieve the constipation some members get because they are so anally retentive to apply the prefix "coterminous" to "Pakistan" making "coterminous Pakistan" thus making the pill that cures the constipation.

On another note I have wasted hours and applied lot of mental energy against revisionist Indians here and other places who regard Pakistan as "India" and avoid using the name Pakistan as they consider it a historical aberration and artificial blot on the geography of the world. That sort of thinking is found mostly among the Akhand Bharat lobby in India. I don't have time right now to explain but I have made robust rebuttal of that.

This is not merely a academic argument but is profound to the very existence of Pakistan and cause of much of the identity malaise you see amongst Pakistani's at home and abroad [in UK] or the wider diaspora. That identity indsecurity is because Pakistan has failed to develop a secure, solid, multi-dimentional identity. The weak identity has found ferile ground for extremist forces like Islamic radicalsm to take root and back in Pakistan the cause of a fractured, fissiperous tendancies. For a country that is now one of the oldest at the UN Pakistan is still behaving like a teenager that is unsure of what it is and what it's place is in the world. And that is parrtly the cause of such destructive tendancies.

This is why I try to be very simple. On the point and enunciate a clear identity - Pakistani or in my case British-Pakistani.
 
.
He can. All he has to say is "coterminous Pakistan" unless you have a aversion to the name Pakistan or have a secret longing for Mata India.
Lols

You have no idea who I am and neither I have any intentions to make you ashamed.

But for your own repo / self respect next don't judge people who express different opinion.

Pakistan doesn't exist before partition and that is the truth.

Ok got it some people metaphorically claim that the day Mohammed Bin Qasim conquer Sindh he became first Pakistani but for historical record there is no such country exist before 1947 named Pakistan but there are divides in Indian society which eventually became two nation theory.
 
.
But for your own repo / self respect next don't judge people who express different opinion.
That could only be denuded by those who have self respect . You don't have any. Now go play your "Indian, Indian, Indian" dance Mr Indian. You will find plenty of takers at Bharat Rakshak for that kind of dance.

For the rest. Please use the "coterminous Pakistan". That applies retroactively the geography of what is today to Pakistan. And just to clarify "India" did not exist either before 1947. Both countries are creations of the British Empire.
 
. . .
That could only be denuded by those who have self respect . You don't have any. Now go play your "Indian, Indian, Indian" dance Mr Indian. You will find plenty of takers at Bharat Rakshak for that kind of dance.
Hey mate why so much angry....ask any member who knows me he will tell you i am the one Indian members hate the most....

I agreed both countries carved out from British India.
 
. . . .

Military Forum Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom