What's new

Oil Sand Revolution In The US? Breakthrough!!

C130

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Aug 1, 2014
Messages
8,092
Reaction score
-1
Country
United States
Location
United States
Could This Technology Be The Innovation The Oil Industry Needs? | OilPrice.com


Something big is happening in Utah, in Asphalt Ridge, where geologists believe there is potentially 1 billion barrels of oil recoverable from oil sands, and where a new breakthrough technology has proven cost-effective at producing ‘clean’ oil sands in a win-win situation for both investors and environmentalists.

Asphalt Ridge is part of the prolific Green River Formation, which spans Utah, Wyoming and Colorado and may hold some 3 trillion barrels of recoverable oil. Utah is the heart of this waking beast, with estimated in-place tar sands oil resources of 32 billion barrels. And at the heart of the heart is Asphalt Ridge, which is thought to contain nearly a billion barrels of oil on its own.

But Utah is more than just a part of the resource-rich Green River Formation—it’s also the proving ground for the latest technology that ensures we get the most out of our oil sands without leaving behind the toxic trailing ponds that have plagued Alberta’s industry.

The new technology—patented by MCW Energy Group (traded in the US under MCWEF and in Canada under MCW.V)—relies on a solvent that uses no water and produces no waste or pollutants, and produces at $27-$30 per barrel.

Toronto-based MCW Energy has been operating its Asphalt Ridge oil sands project since October 2014, and for the past five years it has been working closely with Utah's Responsible Energy Development program to meet—and in some cases exceed—environmental requirements.

Beginning in January 2015, the Asphalt Ridge project has been producing 250 barrels per day of clean oil sands, against the backdrop of intensifying protests by environmentalists who are decrying other oil sands projects in the state for dangerous pollutants.

The Asphalt Ridge technology may be exactly what Utah needs to produce oil from oil sands without tapping into the state’s already sparse water supplies, without turning out dirty oil for potentially catastrophic pipeline leaks, and without returning contaminated sand to the ground. The process is also not reliant on high temperatures or pressures—and it doesn’t emit any greenhouse gases, according to MCW CEO Dr. R. Gerald Bailey, former ExxonMobil (NYSE:XOM) president of Arabian Gulf operations.

A key difference between Utah and Alberta is the nature of the oil sands itself. Utah’s oil sands are oil-wet as opposed to water-wet, which means they can simply be scooped up and processed with the new solvent. The oil is separated and the sand is returned to the ground 99 percent cleaned.

Not only is this clean oil sands project coming out at $27-$30 per barrel in prices that rival OPEC’s average, but once financing goes through for a second 5,000-barrel-per-day plant at the nearby Temple Mountain, the cost per barrel is expected to be reduced to $20.

On 8 September 2015, MCW closed the acquisition of TMC Capital, LLC, giving it the Temple Mountain Project oil sands lease. This project will supply more oil sands for Asphalt Ridge and also serve as the location for the company’s planned 5,000-bpd extraction plant to further drive down costs.

In the meantime, while shale producers are taking a nose-dive in the market, experts estimate that production using this new technology in Utah is more profitable than shale oil currently being produced, and more profitable than any other oil sands project in North America.

It costs about $55 per barrel to produce oil sands in Alberta, compared to Asphalt Ridge’s approximately $30 for clean oil sands. We could even be looking at a shift in focus to clean oil sands and away from Utah’s more expensive-to-produce shale, which had earlier attracted major players such as Marathon Oil (NYSE:MRO), EP Energy Corporation (NYSE:EPE) and Newfield Exploration Co. (NYSE:NFX).

An independent Chapman Engineering Report concludes that MCW’s extraction technology is an innovation with no rivals, particularly from an energy-efficiency perspective.
 
. .
any lower oil world economy will collapse

we are already on the verge of another world recession and lower oil prices is suppose to stimulate the world economy.


the Americas are the next OPEC. Self reliance is soon at hand :D

Canada
U.S
Cuba (suppose to has over 6 to 20 billion+ oil offshore)
Venezuela (declared worlds largest reserves)
Brazil (pre-salt oil in the tens of billions)
Argentina (oil shale)
 
Last edited:
. .
Most of the Oil companies in USA are taking hit in earnings , and mostly the new companies have seen their value fall from greatness to mediocre status , almost few steps from bankruptcies

Oil companies are announcing major layoffs , happening in both oil and also gas supplying sectors.

Investors are flying away from putting money into struggling companies or what they were once called Innovators in new oil finding expeditions.

Almost all US oil companies are taking a hit , and announcing layoffs.

Large oil companies are closing , search for new areas due to lack of funding and CEOs are making up for the loses by firing people


Canada is also seeing its profits tumble as its oil is not generating enough revenue , this economy is in recession , and provinces have no money to pay certain obligations and currency is getting devalued vs Dollar.


Retail business in both USA /Canda is suffering as many large commerce brands are shutting down due to lack of activity and currency fluctuation
 
Last edited:
.
based on companies nearing ......bankrupt status and layoffs in oil sector by thousand

Not to mention retail sector / being effected greatly by fluctuation in dollar value


this is true to a extant.

U.S should do what Argentina is doing and charge higher for oil produced in the U.S
Oil at $77? Argentina Marches to a Different Drummer - Bloomberg Business


a made in the U.S price of $70 would keep oil companies running and U.S workers working.

hell even with oil prices being low we aren't even seeing that big of a drop in gas prices. I think a majority of Americans would be willing to pay .50 cents more per gallon to keep our citizens working.
 
.
Could This Technology Be The Innovation The Oil Industry Needs? | OilPrice.com


Something big is happening in Utah, in Asphalt Ridge, where geologists believe there is potentially 1 billion barrels of oil recoverable from oil sands, and where a new breakthrough technology has proven cost-effective at producing ‘clean’ oil sands in a win-win situation for both investors and environmentalists.

Asphalt Ridge is part of the prolific Green River Formation, which spans Utah, Wyoming and Colorado and may hold some 3 trillion barrels of recoverable oil. Utah is the heart of this waking beast, with estimated in-place tar sands oil resources of 32 billion barrels. And at the heart of the heart is Asphalt Ridge, which is thought to contain nearly a billion barrels of oil on its own.

But Utah is more than just a part of the resource-rich Green River Formation—it’s also the proving ground for the latest technology that ensures we get the most out of our oil sands without leaving behind the toxic trailing ponds that have plagued Alberta’s industry.

The new technology—patented by MCW Energy Group (traded in the US under MCWEF and in Canada under MCW.V)—relies on a solvent that uses no water and produces no waste or pollutants, and produces at $27-$30 per barrel.

Toronto-based MCW Energy has been operating its Asphalt Ridge oil sands project since October 2014, and for the past five years it has been working closely with Utah's Responsible Energy Development program to meet—and in some cases exceed—environmental requirements.

Beginning in January 2015, the Asphalt Ridge project has been producing 250 barrels per day of clean oil sands, against the backdrop of intensifying protests by environmentalists who are decrying other oil sands projects in the state for dangerous pollutants.

The Asphalt Ridge technology may be exactly what Utah needs to produce oil from oil sands without tapping into the state’s already sparse water supplies, without turning out dirty oil for potentially catastrophic pipeline leaks, and without returning contaminated sand to the ground. The process is also not reliant on high temperatures or pressures—and it doesn’t emit any greenhouse gases, according to MCW CEO Dr. R. Gerald Bailey, former ExxonMobil (NYSE:XOM) president of Arabian Gulf operations.

A key difference between Utah and Alberta is the nature of the oil sands itself. Utah’s oil sands are oil-wet as opposed to water-wet, which means they can simply be scooped up and processed with the new solvent. The oil is separated and the sand is returned to the ground 99 percent cleaned.

Not only is this clean oil sands project coming out at $27-$30 per barrel in prices that rival OPEC’s average, but once financing goes through for a second 5,000-barrel-per-day plant at the nearby Temple Mountain, the cost per barrel is expected to be reduced to $20.

On 8 September 2015, MCW closed the acquisition of TMC Capital, LLC, giving it the Temple Mountain Project oil sands lease. This project will supply more oil sands for Asphalt Ridge and also serve as the location for the company’s planned 5,000-bpd extraction plant to further drive down costs.

In the meantime, while shale producers are taking a nose-dive in the market, experts estimate that production using this new technology in Utah is more profitable than shale oil currently being produced, and more profitable than any other oil sands project in North America.

It costs about $55 per barrel to produce oil sands in Alberta, compared to Asphalt Ridge’s approximately $30 for clean oil sands. We could even be looking at a shift in focus to clean oil sands and away from Utah’s more expensive-to-produce shale, which had earlier attracted major players such as Marathon Oil (NYSE:MRO), EP Energy Corporation (NYSE:EPE) and Newfield Exploration Co. (NYSE:NFX).

An independent Chapman Engineering Report concludes that MCW’s extraction technology is an innovation with no rivals, particularly from an energy-efficiency perspective.

Brilliant news :yahoo:
 
.
Well , Iranian oil has not entered market it would be interesting to see what happens world wide when the Iranain oil re enter the oil market and brings down Oil/Gas prices to even lower levels.

Also its fair to say many companies investing in fuel efficient engines , and vehicles or travel options have also been hit hard as their R&D main plus point is of no value anymore due to falling oil and gas prices.
 
.
Well , Iranian oil has not entered market it would be interesting to see what happens world wide when the Iranain oil re enter the oil market and brings down Oil/Gas prices to even lower levels.


it's who will blink first.

OPEC or U.S/Russia.

U.S can just lay off workers and idle oil shale, but when the prices climb the revolution is back on again.

and every year new technology and techniques resources the break even cost of unconventional oil.

OPEC countries can't afford to cut social spending or they will have a Arab spring :enjoy:


a balance of $80 is best for both parties. OPEC and non-OPEC
 
Last edited:
.
it's who will blink first.

OPEC or U.S/Russia.

U.S can just lay off workers and idle oil shale, but when the prices climb the revolution is back on again.

and every year no technology and techniques resources the break even cost.

OPEC countries can't afford to cut social spending or they will have a Arab spring :enjoy:


a balance of $80 is best for both parties. OPEC and non-OPEC

BS $50 should be the price :bounce:
 
.
Wrong move, make oil cheaper and the majority will be less eager to cleaner energy options. I guess this isn't the 21st century.
 
.
Wrong move, make oil cheaper and the majority will be less eager to cleaner energy options. I guess this isn't the 21st century.


this is my fear that we'll fell into a trap of buying SUVs and thinking oil is cheap and unlimited.

with new sources of oil coming in and more efficient cars I would bet peak oil has been delayed another two decades.

i
 
.
this is my fear that we'll fell into a trap of buying SUVs and thinking oil is cheap and unlimited.

with new sources of oil coming in and more efficient cars I would bet peak oil has been delayed another two decades.

i

Electric cars haven't taken off in united states even after govt. subsidy. People are still sceptical about its feasibility in long run. People with electric cars now have second car- a petrol or diesel for their long drives. If shale oil takes off then you can say good bye to electric cars.
 
.
Electric cars haven't taken off in united states even after govt. subsidy. People are still sceptical about its feasibility in long run. People with electric cars now have second car- a petrol or diesel for their long drives. If shale oil takes off then you can say good bye to electric cars.

electric cars would take off if the infrastructure was available same for LNG cars as well, but with the right investment this can be fixed.

also the cost of electric cars should decrease significantly by 2020.

one of the major costs of electric cars is the battery and with the giga factory being built in Nevada that should solve that problem.


Gigafactory 1 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
.

Latest posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom