What's new

Of Pakistan, Terrorism, and Confusion

Introspection has its place, but introspection is not going to fix the situation, nor is it necessarily helpful in terms of the self flagellation some commentators wish Pakistanis engage in in the current circumstances. If some Pakistanis blame India for the bombing in Peshawar that killed their loved ones, do you think that because they blame India they'll look the other way if they see a man preparing a car for a suicide bombing? Will they miraculously pay attention to such a man and report him if they blame the Taliban/AQ instead of India?

Of course not - just because Pakistanis blame one entity or the other does not affect the central issue of Pakistanis condemning terrorism and seeking an end to it. There are those who genuinely sympathize with the Taliban/AQ, a minority, and they likely silently cheer these acts of savagery, but the vast majority of Pakistanis are sick and tired of this menace, and will fight it provided the government provides the guidance and tools to do so. By tools I mean efficient, trusted and well equipped LEA's, channels to convey concerns about suspicious activity through, and a process and system that Pakistanis can have faith in enough to use without fearing they or their loved ones might get dragged into the anti-terrorist net for speaking up.

That is what will make a tangible difference in fighting terrorism, not attempts to get Pakistanis to introspect, and 'blame the correct entity'.

Introspection is a valuable exercise if it helps people recognize the real enemy within. You cannot defeat the real enemy if you keep focusing on the bogeyman.

Stemming Taliban/AQ terrorism is not just about LEA stopping the suicide bomber. It also requires that we create a consensus across the population against the TTP/AQ narrative, and in doing so restrict the jihadi network's ability to engage in self-serving propaganda.

Currently, there are scores of taliban apologists including retired officers, media anchors, political party leaders who keep offering wild-eyed explanations and justifications for the TTP atrocities.

And as the writer pointed out, a lot of pakistanis(including the educated ones) still continue to buy into that nonsense, and are living in a state of denial.

As the public's appreciation of the jihadi threat grows stronger, it will give the political government greater clout to go beyond simply acting against the jihadi foot soldiers in SW and FATA, and focus on rooting out the militant sympathizer network burrowed deep within our political, religious and security establishment. Greater public recognition of the real enemy is a critical pre-requisite for sustaining and strengthening the political will to tackle the enemy.
 
Last edited:
The Threat Within
Ayesha Siddiqa

A few days ago I came across a letter to the editor in Dawn in which the writer had protested against the use of the word ‘Taliban’ to describe the brutal killers currently terrorising the nation.

In the writer’s view, such people should be termed ‘zaliman’. I thought I would advise the writer to watch more television and read newspapers to get rid of his anger against the Taliban.

Perhaps the writer would have benefited tremendously by watching a programme aired recently on a TV channel in which three distinguished maulanas — including Jamaat-i-Islami leader Fareed Paracha — argued that the Taliban were being needlessly maligned since there was no evidence available to prove that the attacks were being carried out by the Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan.

Furthermore, it was said that the TTP’s claiming responsibility for terrorist attacks inside Pakistan did not add up to much since anyone could make those calls just to malign the organisation of non-state militants.

The above interview came a couple of days after the army claimed to have found evidence of India’s involvement in the conflict in Waziristan. Islamabad should take the evidence to the International Court of Justice since it does not hope to get a fair hearing from anyone else in the world, certainly not the US. Since India and America are viewed as being ‘hand-in-glove’, Pakistan cannot afford to share the above information with Washington as New Delhi did in the case of the Mumbai attacks.

The evidence of India’s involvement should be sufficient to put the aforementioned letter writer’s mind at rest. Now we no longer need to search for internal sources of violence.

Since the responsibility of the conflict in the region is now the responsibility of the US followed by India, we need not even look at the fact that Pakistan witnessed about 45 terrorist attacks before 9/11 which many in this country view as the sole cause of strife and bloodshed in the entire region. We can no longer argue that 9/11 just expedited the process of bringing to the surface all those elements or networks that later caused violence in the region.

I would go further and apprise the writer of another crucial fact that technically, there are no home-grown terrorists in Pakistan since there has never been any conviction in a major case of terrorism. The significant names that are associated with extremist terrorist activities such as Haq Nawaz Jhangvi, Riaz Basra and Malik Ishaq of the Sipah-i-Sahaba Pakistan (SSP)/Lashkar-i-Jhangvi (LJ), Qari Saifullah Akhtar of Harkat-ul-Jihad-ul-Islami (HuJI) or Masood Azhar of Jaish-i-Mohammad (JM) and many others are foreign concoctions.

The country’s legal system is such that the onus of proving an individual or organisation’s responsibility in an act of terror lies on the state. So, if the police are unable to bring concrete evidence before the court it is difficult to convict those accused of terrorism by the law-enforcers. Moreover, the legal procedures take so long that the prosecution (being the state) is unable to hold on to witnesses. They either die, are killed or are too scared to give evidence against organisations and individuals with a particular reputation.

Technically, it is but fair to let people go if nothing can be proven against them. This was essentially the position which Pervez Musharraf took for not pursuing action against those who were swapped for the hostages of Indian Airlines flight IC 184 which was hijacked to Kandahar in 1999. Why arrest someone if even the enemy had failed to convict the people after keeping them in jail for so many years?

Hence, it is not surprising that there are hardly any convictions. In a couple of cases where this has happened, as in the case of American journalist Daniel Pearl’s murder, the death sentence has not been carried out.

We now know that Khaled Sheikh Mohammad of Al Qaeda and not Omar Saeed Sheikh committed the murder. Probably, it was in appreciation of Sheikh’s innocence that his jailers in Hyderabad allowed him access to several SIMs and mobile phones that he then used for very naughty activities, which we will not report here as acts of potential terrorism.

One might just wonder about the killings of Shias in the country, which have been going on since the mid-1980s when the SSP was reportedly established to fight the Tehrik-i-Nifaz-i-Fiqh-i-Jafria by the state. We hardly notice that last year there were systematic killings of Shias in Dera Ismail Khan and before that of Shia doctors in Karachi. The killing of Shias in Balochistan by the Taliban also goes unnoticed by the media and the authorities.

Surely one cannot discuss Balochistan at all where there is much more serious evidence of India’s involvement. The maulanas might argue again that sectarian violence in Balochistan is an Indian/American conspiracy.

The person who wrote the letter might decide to respond to this piece and might argue that the behaviour pattern of the Pakistani establishment and the bulk of the people remains the same. We accused the East Pakistanis of being Indian agents and said the civil war was caused by Hindu teachers in collusion with the Indian state. Any signs of India’s involvement very naturally mar our ability to look at other possibilities or threats.

In East Pakistan’s case, for instance, the internal crisis had nothing to do with the unfair treatment of the Bengalis by the West Pakistani civil and military establishment. The only truth about that era was that the Mukti Bahini was trained by Indian intelligence.

We in Pakistan are coming close to a point where we can comfortably forget that we have elements within that want to take over (perhaps not physically) the state in pursuance of their pan-Islamic agenda. The war being fought by Pakistan due to international pressure is what has caused all the violence.

I would like to refer to the golden words of Punjab’s Law Minister Rana Sanaullah in response to the allegation of south Punjab turning into a hub of extremism and terrorism.

The minister felt there was no training taking place in the region and if people were getting recruited to fight in Afghanistan or other places, how could the government stop this. After all, we live in a free country.


Under the circumstances, my only advice to the writer of the letter is that if he begins to feel unsafe vis-à-vis the presence of the ‘zaliman’ within, he/she should build additional bunkers outside the house.
 
Introspection is a valuable exercise if it helps people recognize the real enemy within. You cannot defeat the real enemy if you keep focusing on the bogeyman.

Stemming Taliban/AQ terrorism is not just about LEA stopping the suicide bomber. It also requires that we create a consensus across the population against the TTP/AQ narrative, and in doing so restrict the jihadi network's ability to engage in self-serving propaganda.

Currently, there are scores of taliban apologists including retired officers, media anchors, political party leaders who keep offering wild-eyed explanations and justifications for the TTP atrocities.

And as the writer pointed out, a lot of pakistanis(including the educated ones) still continue to buy into that nonsense, and are living in a state of denial.

As the public's appreciation of the jihadi threat grows stronger, it will give the political government greater clout to go beyond simply acting against the jihadi foot soldiers in SW and FATA, and focus on rooting out the militant sympathizer network burrowed deep within our political, religious and security establishment. Greater public recognition of the real enemy is a critical pre-requisite for sustaining and strengthening the political will to tackle the enemy.

Show me how blaming one entity rather than another will help in tangibly combating the terrorist threat.

As I asked earlier - do people allow a suicide bomber to go about his business because they believe him to be 'sponsored by India & Isreal'?
 
News Jang Group

Saturday, November 14, 2009
One of the reasons it is so difficult to root out terrorists from Pakistan is that too many Pakistanis are easily fooled by anyone wearing the mask of Islam. They would much rather see the enemy as 'foreign powers', namely India, Israel and the US. These feelings are so deep-seated among such Pakistanis that they still refuse to believe that 'fellow Muslims', i.e. the Taliban or Al Qaeda, would target innocent Pakistanis. And this after a period of years, after thousands of Pakistanis have been attacked, after the Al Qaeda leader, Ayman Muhammad Rabaie al-Zawahiri, has openly declared his intention to wreak havoc on Pakistan on more than one occasion, and after the Al Qaeda presence has been literally unveiled before TV cameras by the Pakistan army after some Libyans, Egyptians and Saudis were caught trying to escape wearing burqas during the Operation Rah-e-Rast in Swat.

Such obviously stupid talk does no harm to India, Israel or the US. However, it does tremendous harm to Pakistan -- because it confuses the response to enemy attacks and does nothing for the morale of the soldiers and the police actually tasked with defending Pakistan from these attackers. After all, 'know your enemy' is the fundamental tenet during wartime. Yes, my beloved countrymen, it is so-called 'Muslims' who are seeking to break up a part of Pakistan for themselves. It is so-called 'Muslims' who have been butchering captives, beating poor villagers, sending suicide bombers to blow up ordinary Pakistanis. Please have the good sense and moral courage to face facts.

I was very supportive of individuals like Imran Khan, Hamid Mir and even of Jamaat-e-Islami for the role they played during the lawyers' movement. Now, I am very sorry to say, they are nothing more than the witless accomplices of the Taliban and Al Qaeda. And in this way at least, they are no different than the individuals who have been fooled by the mask of Islam to don suicide jackets and maim and murder innocent people.

Tauheed Ahmed
 
The convenient curtain of myth

Recently, I met some jihadis who have been in the business of holy war since the 1990s. I was surprised to hear that even though they were in support of the jihad in Afghanistan and Kashmir, they were opposed to the idea of destabilising Pakistan itself. When asked who was responsible for the suicide bombings and target killings they had an overarching theory to explain the tricky business. According to them, India, the United States, and Israel had colluded resources to create a super-agency to dishevel this entire region. Though they admitted that convincing a hardened jihadi that the government of Pakistan was also part of the enemy collaborative wasn’t too much of a stretch, they also added that a true jihadi would not be involved in the killing of innocent people.

Surprisingly enough, this whole India-US-Israel theory has a lot of popular currency these days in Pakistan, a country whose national sports should be lounge room politics and conspiracy theorising instead of cricket and hockey. The myriad of television talk-shows on every news channel are heavily relying on this theory of a triangulated axis of evil out to destroy Islam and Pakistan with one nifty stone’s throw of insurgent terror.

I don’t mean to dampen Pakistan’s highly built up superiority complex laced with self pity at the whole world’s always being out to get us, but has anyone ever thought of questioning why we always situate Pakistan at the centre of our world view? It is true that Pakistan is in the news a lot these days, and that the location of our borders in terms of resources and trade routes present significant geopolitical interests. But isn’t it a bit much to consider the current conflict in terms of issues that lie beyond the immediately obvious uses of Pakistan’s soil, and therefore hurl the current conflict in to the realm of myth and conspiracy?

Islamic mythology has obviously played a huge role in the formation of our national identity. It is telling that the history books we’re taught in school start from Mohenjodaro and Harappa, jump to the life of the Prophet in pagan Arabia, and then an interlude of early Islamic history until the likes of Muhammad bin Qasim finally brings Islam to the subcontinent. After that, the Muslim personalities involved in South Asian politics are closely followed up until the creation of Pakistan as a homeland for the Muslims.

Given this strange mix of religious indoctrination and nationalist propaganda, it isn’t a shock that our national identity is hopelessly intertwined with religion. The great ups and downs of our history are also then viewed though the mirror image of early Islamic Arabian history, starting with the Partition of 1947 where the oppressed Muslims in the land of infidels partake in a hijrah-like migration to greener pastures. This is also responsible for similar coinages as mohajir’s for people who migrated from the other side of the border, and of course the Muttahida Quami Movement as well. Looking across the border with the same deeply rooted scepticism through which we historically view pagan Mecca also comes with the national identity combo-meal.

After two wars with our neighbour that have been cloaked in the same historical-identity mirror as jihads which the Prophet Muhammad participated in – the 1965 war, where a small number of Muslims beat a larger threatening army of infidels akin to the scenario in Jang-e-Badar, and the 1971 war being similar to Jang-e-Uhad, where the Muslims suffered heavy losses owing to their greed and indiscipline. Kargil would then be seen as the Battle of the Trench, had it not ended with such a national disaster.

The idea of martyrdom has been historically very close to these times of crisis when national unity is a must. The list of the dozen or so shaheeds who gave their life for the country is also present in every textbook. Unfortunately, the idea of the martyr as a member of Pakistan’s armed forces has become one that is hotly contested in recent times, as the right to declare a martyr isn’t the sole prerogative of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan. The ISPR’s version of a shaheed in Waziristan is diametrically opposed to that of the TTP’s version of shaheed.

The same mujahids who valiantly fought in Kashmir and Afghanistan for Islam and Pakistan, seem to have turned on the Islamic Republic as the very fabric of propaganda which binds Islam with Pakistan is ruptured beyond repair. With the popularly elected government being portrayed as infidel rule propped up by the Americans, and the culture of the modern, westernised elites is labeled as shamelessness and excessive debauchery, it seems we’re caught in the middle of a storm where the hero can no longer be told apart from the enemy.

For decades, the enemy image coined in our heads has been that of the Islam-hating, darker-skinned Hindu at the eastern edge of our border. One can imagine how much violence the average Pakistanis’ worldview must have been subjected to when the heroic mujahid suddenly became the enemy, in less than a decade. A painful readjustment of the conventional enemy image is needed in order to re-galvanize the nation behind these destroyers of the idea of Pakistan.

This interesting transposition was evident in an armed forces award ceremony in which shaheeds from the current conflict were inducted into the ranks of those martyred in Pakistan’s conventional wars. The reenacted footage telegraphing each incident showed a mysterious tribal as the concealed enemy. The army also seems to be relying on foreigners being involved in the tribal areas as a way to distance the conflict from civil strife. The circulation of reports of large containers of alcohol belonging to Uzbek militants also seems to be a way of distancing Islam from the enemy.

However, it appears that instead of reevaluating things through a more rational approach, we’ve stuck to our patchwork quilt of mythological identity through a couple of quick-and-easy adjustments. As a matter of convenience for our security establishment, the principal enemy obviously remains India. But those polygamous infidels couldn’t possibly be the solely responsible for such an ingenious plan that redirects our tactics against them and literally brings the country to its knees? No, that’s not possible. So who could they possibly be in cahoots with?

Once again the answer is conveniently available from early Islamic Arabia, where the Meccan pagans were conspiring with scheming Jewish tribes. A simple transposition of the historical onto our mythological identity yields the result of India and Israel collaborating for the destruction of Pakistan, with the US sitting on the fringes like the Holy Roman Empire.

I think it’s time we quit hiding behind the convenient curtain of myth, and take the bitter pill of reality. For once, for that might help us frame this conflict in more rational terms and possibly lead us closer to a solution, rather than further feeding propaganda to the conflict. If the present reasoning of global evils out to destroy Islam and Pakistan continues, then the only answer is the apocalyptic war which is talked about in fringe mythologies related to the arrival of the Antichrist.

The last thing we want is for this to be a self-fulfilling prophecy! We need to step away from viewing this as a clash of civilisations, in terms of Islam versus the West. This is a misinformed dichotomy, since the West is not a religion, and Islam isn’t a geographical location. The more hopelessly intertwined our nationality becomes with a faux mythology, the more susceptible it becomes to being hijacked by those wishing to extract temporary gains from this vulnerability.

The convenient curtain of myth — The Dawn Blog Blog Archive
 
Last edited by a moderator:
News Jang Group

Saturday, November 14, 2009
One of the reasons it is so difficult to root out terrorists from Pakistan is that too many Pakistanis are easily fooled by anyone wearing the mask of Islam. They would much rather see the enemy as 'foreign powers', namely India, Israel and the US. These feelings are so deep-seated among such Pakistanis that they still refuse to believe that 'fellow Muslims', i.e. the Taliban or Al Qaeda, would target innocent Pakistanis. And this after a period of years, after thousands of Pakistanis have been attacked, after the Al Qaeda leader, Ayman Muhammad Rabaie al-Zawahiri, has openly declared his intention to wreak havoc on Pakistan on more than one occasion, and after the Al Qaeda presence has been literally unveiled before TV cameras by the Pakistan army after some Libyans, Egyptians and Saudis were caught trying to escape wearing burqas during the Operation Rah-e-Rast in Swat.

Such obviously stupid talk does no harm to India, Israel or the US. However, it does tremendous harm to Pakistan -- because it confuses the response to enemy attacks and does nothing for the morale of the soldiers and the police actually tasked with defending Pakistan from these attackers. After all, 'know your enemy' is the fundamental tenet during wartime. Yes, my beloved countrymen, it is so-called 'Muslims' who are seeking to break up a part of Pakistan for themselves. It is so-called 'Muslims' who have been butchering captives, beating poor villagers, sending suicide bombers to blow up ordinary Pakistanis. Please have the good sense and moral courage to face facts.

I was very supportive of individuals like Imran Khan, Hamid Mir and even of Jamaat-e-Islami for the role they played during the lawyers' movement. Now, I am very sorry to say, they are nothing more than the witless accomplices of the Taliban and Al Qaeda. And in this way at least, they are no different than the individuals who have been fooled by the mask of Islam to don suicide jackets and maim and murder innocent people.

Tauheed Ahmed

SH,

Mr. Ahmed refers to a slightly different dynamic - one where Pakistanis refuse to recognize that any Pakistanis/Muslims are involved in this carnage, and absolve the TTP/AQ of any blame and refuse to cooperate with the authorities in combating them. People like that exist certainly, and are a huge problem, but they are not the overwhelming majority of Pakistanis IMO.

My point is that it makes no difference to the struggle against the TTP, AQ etc. whether Pakistanis consider them sponsored by Israel/India or acting on their own, so long as they condemn the local groups committing terrorism (which was not the case before the whipping episode in Swat) and support the GoP in taking all necessary action against them.

I am not opposed to this dialog on introspection taking place, it is essential in the long run, but in the near term we don't need to get too hung up on whether Pakistanis blame India/Israel for using the extremists as tools, or whether they see them acting on their own.

The most important issue for now is that a majority of Pakistanis continue to oppose terrorism and terrorist groups, they can do so by doing what the above pieces argue needs to be done, or they can do so via the bogeyman of RAW/Mossad, I don't care.

This dialog on 'introspection' can continue simultaneously, but it is a long term dialog, and you shouldn't expect Pakistanis to all of sudden start perceiving this war in starkly different terms, and in the absence of that shift argue that as the reason for continuing terrorism. As I said before, Pakistanis who oppose terrorism will oppose a suicide bomber whether they believe him to be acting on his own as a Pakistani Muslim or as an agent of India, they will oppose the TTP and AQ whether they believe the organizations to be committing terrorism on their own or as 'agents of RAW/Mossad'.

The metric to watch for is public opposition to terrorism and terrorists, not who people see as supporting those terrorists.
 


Pakistani musicians who are supposed to be public opinion makers say that Taliban are one of the little problems this country is facing and USA is the biggest problem of all!!!
:hitwall::hitwall::hitwall:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Ali Azmat talking about Religion..Wow!! lol...Anyway who cares about these singers and they also can't sing openly because taliban will bomb them then!!
 
From Patriot..

6. Some of us also claim that TTP is getting support from the US, India and Israel to destabilize Pakistan and ultimately disarm Pakistan from nukes. Here we imply that the US distinguishes between TTP and Afghan Taliban. How would the US or CIA feed the people whose only justification for violence is based on Anti-Americanism. Why is the US giving Pakistan aid for nuclear safety and defense if its wants too denuclearize Pakistan?

Why U.S. bombed Japan and than made "big" trade agreements...
Same goes with Germany…
U.K. also made trade agreements with Germany
U.K. also made us (people of sub continent) slaves but they did not make any trade agreements or defence ones with us that time but after bombing Germany and its occupied land they did make agreements with them..
What was present there which was not present here (sub continent)


TTP first said that we are fighting against America
Than they said they are fighting against American Allies i.e. PA
Than they said they want to implement Sharia..

They did say the things together but their focus shifted as time passed...

They exploited the feeling of people by commenting against U.S….so people honored their decision….when they were blamed that they were U.S. allies than they started to say that we have to implement Sharia….
They wanted to become popular among people…

:pakistan:
 
Last edited:
Ali Azmat talking about Religion..Wow!! lol...Anyway who cares about these singers and they also can't sing openly because taliban will bomb them then!!

Talaban are not against naat and shairo shairi, Ali Azmat and pop singers can follow Junaid Jamshad:D
 
As you should know by now, everyone does not interpret Islam the same way. Some people believe flogging women is allowed in Islam, some don't. Some people believe the requirement of 4 witnesses for rape is Islam, some don't. Define your Islamic principles. What kind of Islamic laws would there be?


“The fornicatress and the fornicator, flog each of them with a hundred stripes. Let not pity withhold you in their case, in a punishment prescribed by Allaah” [al-Noor 24:2]

Muslims follow Quran and hadeeth.
 
bzbO_C7a9Ww[/media] - Pakistani Musicians Speak Out Against the US- Not The Taliban (MastiKorner.com)


Pakistani musicians who are supposed to be public opinion makers say that Taliban are one of the little problems this country is facing and USA is the biggest problem of all!!!
:hitwall::hitwall::hitwall:

This seems like a propaganda video. There is cut and paste job all over, the interviews and comment seem to be at least couple of years old because as of recently, this year, I haven't heard a single such comment from any artist. Just two days ago musicians and actors held a charity cricket match dedicated to the armed forces and operation rah e nijaat, the proceeds forwarded to sheehds families. They didn't hold this event for Taliban.

Another quip I have with the video is the zealous message being forced down viewers throats. To me a message looses it's cradebility when the messenger talks in a creepy monologue underlyning his agenda bearing message over and over with support of constant quotes and comments that are often edited, cut and pasted - in this case the CNN guys message that even the educated masses in Pakistan support taliban and hate the west with extreme prejudice.
Clearly that is not the case just by looking at this thread alone and the amount of articles written by Pakistani journalists from various Pakistani papers which are targeting Taliban and Taliban only.

But anyway it doesn't matter. I stay continue to critsize us because you're giving us the opertunity to do only better. Case in point operation rah e raast and the IDP situation stemming from it. We performed extraordinary facing mountanious of global and domestic critcism.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
You speak the truth.

“The fornicatress and the fornicator, flog each of them with a hundred stripes. Let not pity withhold you in their case, in a punishment prescribed by Allaah” [al-Noor 24:2]

Muslims follow Quran and hadeeth.
 
“The fornicatress and the fornicator, flog each of them with a hundred stripes. Let not pity withhold you in their case, in a punishment prescribed by Allaah” [al-Noor 24:2]

Muslims follow Quran and hadeeth.

It seems no muslim country is based entirely on quran and hadith. Fundamentalist says even Saudi Arabia and Taliban is not based entirely on quran and hadith. The weird thing is that muslims themselves are not following the 'true shariah law.' In that case, it seems shariah law is too backward to be followed today :D
 
It seems no muslim country is based entirely on quran and hadith. Fundamentalist says even Saudi Arabia and Taliban is not based entirely on quran and hadith. The weird thing is that muslims themselves are not following the 'true shariah law.' In that case, it seems shariah law is too backward to be followed today :D

Islam is not back ward , your understanding is wrong , to implement shariah is long term process at grass root level but not through single order from government or through use of power (talaban and JI style).

Six principles of Islam help to creat a condusive environment required for implementation of Islamic law .

1.Qalma- Strong Faith on Allah and His powers and Muhammad PBUH His last prophet.
2.Prayer- Direct Comunication with Allah five times in 24 hours
3.Education and Zakir-Enhancement of Knowledge and purification of Soul through reading of Quran.
4.Rights of all Human Beings- Full fill the rights of others including muslim and non muslims
5.Every action(ie Cherity) for sake of Allah not for any material benefits from others
6.Dawah and Tableeg-It is prime responsibility of every muslim to first learn islam and then spread islam all over the world.

When majority of muslim start practicing islam and willing to follow shariah law then shariah law shall be implemented but struggle to attain the required level need continues struggle at individual level and at national level.

Darkness has no existance it is due to absence of light.
 

Latest posts

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom