What's new

Obama's Afghanistan Strategy Begins to Emerge

abdulrafi

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Feb 19, 2007
Messages
278
Reaction score
0
VOA News - Obama's Afghanistan Strategy Begins to Emerge

Obama's Afghanistan Strategy Begins to Emerge
By Al Pessin
Pentagon
13 March 2009



President Obama is expected to announce his strategy for Afghanistan before the end of the month, after a fairly secretive, two-month review by senior civilian and military officials, and consultation with allies. But elements of the strategy have begun to emerge in comments by officials involved in, or familiar with, the process. The strategy is expected to lead international efforts in Afghanistan for years to come.

Senior U.S. officials have been avoiding questions about the new Afghanistan strategy for weeks. But in doing so, they have revealed some of its elements, as Defense Secretary Robert Gates did on National Public Radio on March 10.

"I would say that at a minimum, the mission is to prevent the Taliban from retaking power against a democratically elected government in Afghanistan and thus turning Afghanistan, potentially again, into a haven for al Qaida and other extremist groups," he said..



Secretary Gates spoke of identifying short-to-medium-term goals for Afghanistan - things that can be achieved in three to five years.

"We need to have goals, at least in the near to mid-term, that are achievable," he said. "And where there are some benchmarks where we can measure whether we're actually making progress in getting to a better place in Afghanistan, in terms of security, in terms of the credibility of the government and so on."

The defense secretary says that involves increasing the size of the Afghan military, providing more foreign troops to secure its presidential election in August and delivering more civilian assistance to improve the Afghan government's performance, fight corruption and promote economic development. He has also called for better coordination of international efforts.

Another part of the administration's new approach appears to be growing support for Afghan government efforts to reconcile with some elements of the Taliban and other militant organizations. President Obama has said that a similar policy had success in Iraq and might work in Afghanistan although he acknowledged there are big differences between the two counties. Secretary Gates also addressed the issue of reconciliation at a NATO defense ministers' meeting in Poland in February.

"We have said all along that ultimately some sort of political reconciliation has to be part of the long-term solution in Afghanistan," he said. "And so I think that if there is a reconciliation, if insurgents are made to put down their arms, if the reconciliation is essentially on the terms being offered by the government, then I think that we would be very open to that.

Other aspects of the emerging U.S. approach are also being made public. A senior defense official told reporters this week that the first goal is to improve security to be able to address other issues from what the official called "a position of strength." That is why President Obama announced a nearly 50 percent increase in the number of U.S. troops in Afghanistan even before the strategy review was completed. The senior defense official, who spoke on condition of anonymity, says the United States also wants to ensure "that the Afghanistan-Pakistan border region ceases to be a safe haven for" terrorists.

Pentagon Spokesman Bryan Whitman spoke about that aspect of the emerging strategy on Friday.

"When you're looking at Afghanistan, you have to look at it from a regional perspective," he said. "Well, that's exactly what the Afghanistan strategy is designed to do. And what's happening in Pakistan is integral to what's happening in Afghanistan. "


US Vice President Joe Biden (L) speaks with NATO Secretary-General Jaap de Hoop Scheffer during NATO meeting in Brussels, 10 March 2009
Senior U.S. officials, including Secretary Gates and Vice President Joe Biden, have been consulting with Afghan, Pakistani and NATO officials as part of the strategy review. They hope that will not only improve the final document, but also will make it more likely that other nations will accept it as the guiding strategy of the broader international effort in Afghanistan.

Analyst and former U.S. ambassador to Ukraine Steven Pifer of the Brookings Institution says a key moment will come when President Obama presents his strategy at NATO's summit meeting in France and Germany starting April 3.

"That'll be an important discussion because an important part of getting allied buy-in will be to the extent that we have a persuasive strategy, that others say 'this strategy will work, it can work,'" he said "And that can be key to getting either military support or additional civilian reconstruction support from the other allies."

The strategy review group is expected to finish its draft report in the coming week or so, with important work to follow by top civilian and military officials, and final decisions to be made by President Obama. Officials say he will publicly present his plan in less than three weeks, shortly before he meets with his NATO counterparts.
 
.
The Americans can never win in Afghanistan. Obama realizes this and will have to make some fundamental changes to the current failing strategy. The war rhetoric has faded away ever since the invasion. The reality today is that Afghanistan is a failed poppy state ruled by corrupt and oppressive warlords. Every institute in that country is corrupt and literally non-existent. The invasion has failed and has only exacerbated the situation for the ordinary Afghan. The people don't have any future and the insurgency is taking its toll. Obama is going to have to negotiate with the Taliban. Obama is taking a u-turn in comparison to W.
 
.
ya negotiations might work and it might be the only way to succeed in afghanistan to accept taliban and leave the country then aprroch them from a different angel that is economic prespective the developmental prespective . US can do alot to construct the Afghan Infrastructure .
THE AFGHAN scenario demands a rapid change. But wat if america still remains on a course of battlling taliban then they might be fighting them for the next 100 years.
 
.
Well, the dilemma for the US is to bring about security and at the same ensure that the Taliban become mainstream. One thing is certain, any war that involves guerilla style insurgency is practically impossible to win. The US has made a huge blunder by invading war torn Afghanistan. If they intend to beat the Taliban they are in it for a very long ride with almost no guarantee to success. The prospects are very bleak. The Americans find themselves in the most difficult situation since the Cold War.
 
Last edited:
.
Well, the dilemma for the US is to bring about security and at the same ensure that the Taliban become mainstream. One thing is certain, any war that involves guerilla style insurgency is practically impossible to win. The US has made a huge blunder by invading war torn Afghanistan. If they intend to beat the Taliban they are in it for a very long ride with almost no guarantee to success. The prospects are very bleak. The Americans find themselves in the most difficult situation they have been into since the Cold War.


Completly disagree,

The US is not in dilemma regarding Afganistan, but towards Pakistan. I am beginning to like the Obama strategy were his approach is more holistic for Afganistan. Where the key player of the region (Iran, Russia, etc..) are included in the strategy. Beside speculating much on the new strategy, the approach of "diplomatic puch on all levels" (Mr. Mullen) will make a difference overall in Afganistan.

"Where I loss some sleep is Pakistan" (Mr. Mullen). I am really waiting to see, what Obama plan will be regarding Pakistan.
 
.
Completly disagree,

The US is not in dilemma regarding Afganistan, but towards Pakistan. I am beginning to like the Obama strategy were his approach is more holistic for Afganistan. Where the key player of the region (Iran, Russia, etc..) are included in the strategy. Beside speculating much on the new strategy, the approach of "diplomatic puch on all levels" (Mr. Mullen) will make a difference overall in Afganistan.

"Where I loss some sleep is Pakistan" (Mr. Mullen). I am really waiting to see, what Obama plan will be regarding Pakistan.

You are entitled to your opinion. I beg to differ with your opinion. Pakistan isn't much of a challenge as compared to war torn Afghanistan. If Pakistan would have been the main challenge, the US wouldn't be camping in Afghanistan. Pakistan is the key to success in Afghanistan and Adm. Mullen has reiterated this many times in the past. Obama is also the same person that wants to resolve the Kashmir dispute much to the dislike of the Indian political establishment. Obama is in a very awkward position and will have to give in order to take. Pakistan is going to press very hard for certain favors and Kashmir is on the list. Obama can formulate as many policies regarding Pakistan as he likes. Only the Pakistani army will decide whether these policies get implemented or not.
 
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom