What's new

NYTIMES: Kashmiri Teenagers Are Dying to Protect Militants

ziaulislam

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Apr 22, 2010
Messages
23,621
Reaction score
9
Country
Pakistan
Location
United States
Kashmiri Teenagers Are Dying to Protect Militants
Image
The funeral procession last month of Numan Ashraf Bhat, center, who was fatally shot at age 16 while trying to prevent Indian forces from killing a militant.CreditTauseef Mustafa/Agence France-Presse — Getty Images


By Sameer Yasir

  • Dec. 18, 2018
BALSOO, Kashmir — It was well past midnight in the village of Balsoo when Numan Ashraf Bhat’s phone lit up with an urgent WhatsApp message: “Umar surrounded by forces.”

Umar Majid Ganai, one of the area’s most wanted militants, had built a loyal youth following in Kashmir, a Himalayan region disputed between India and Pakistan where violence has claimed tens of thousands of lives. Numan, a gangly 16-year-old, was one of his most enthusiastic supporters — all of the photos downloaded on his phone were of Mr. Ganai.

So when Numan learned last month that Mr. Ganai was holed up in a tiny hamlet, Indian security forces closing in, he jumped on his motorbike and sped through the biting cold to reach the house where several militants were trapped.

Hundreds of Kashmiri civilians had already gathered. They were forming a protective ring to block Indian officers from advancing, part of a new and often fatal development in the decades-long struggle over Kashmir.

Kashmiri protesters take cover behind a tin sheet as they clash with Indian security forces in Srinagar in October.CreditDar Yasin/Associated Press
But along with the combatants’ deaths has come a new set of casualties: those of civilians who try to defend them. Gone are the days when the sight of an armored vehicle was enough to send entire villages into hiding. Now, civilians are rushing in front of the heavily armed trucks, using stones and their own bodies to try to block security forces.

Last week, seven civilians were killedafter inserting themselves between militants and advancing officers.

“This is a new phenomenon,” said Sheikh Showkat Hussain, an international law professor at the Central University of Kashmir. “Civilians have always supported militants, but never with such conviction.”

first report on atrocities committed in Kashmir, calling for an international investigation into reports of sexual violence and torture. Indian security forces were sharply criticized for using excessive force on protesters, and particularly for firing shotguns into crowds, with hundreds of people struck in the eyes by pellets, leaving many of them blind.

India has pushed back against criticism of its methods. After the release of the United Nations report, the government called its contents “fallacious, tendentious and motivated.” Last year, Bipin Rawat, the Indian Army chief, said that people who “obstruct our operations” would be “treated as over-ground workers” — in other words, collaborators.

Image
Villagers carrying the body of Burhan Muzaffar Wani, a charismatic militant leader, during his funeral procession in 2016.CreditDar Yasin/Associated Press
In 2016, the nature of civilian protests took a turn when Burhan Muzaffar Wani, a charismatic militant leader with a vast following on social media, was fatally shot in the Indian-administered part of Kashmir.

Numan Ashraf Bhat’s parents, Mohammad Ashraf Bhat and his wife, Naza Bano, at home. “If he would not have died like this, he would have died as a militant,” the father said.CreditShowkat Nanda for The New York Times
Numan Ashraf, a high school student, knew the risks of traveling those 15 miles to the village of Batgund, where Mr. Ganai was holed up in a house with other militants. His friendship with a wanted militant is a window into the growing civilian support for the homegrown fighters — and the deadly risks of such a relationship.

Numan, the oldest of three sons of a woodcutter, was born into a tense security situation and seemed acutely aware of it. Every summer, his family said, Numan and his friends dressed up as militants or Indian army officers, hid behind apple trees and fired fake wooden guns at each other.

Over the years, Numan also met Mr. Ganai, 27, several times, his friends said. They played cricket and went swimming in a pond together. During a chaotic funeral for another militant, Numan spotted Mr. Ganai and hugged him.

Nadeem Ashraf Bhat, center, the 14-year-old brother of Numan, has also tried to get between Indian forces and trapped militants.CreditShowkat Nanda for The New York Times
Young protesters, desperate to save the fighters, tried to drive the Indian forces back or create enough chaos to distract them to give the last militants a chance to slip away. It had happened before that insurgents melted into a sea of civilians and vanished right in front of security officers.

A relative visiting the grave of Numan Ashraf Bhat earlier this month.CreditShowkat Nanda for The New York Times
Over the next couple of days, thousands of mourners gathered for a marathon of funerals, one after the other, spreading the grief. In Balsoo, the streets were so clogged with people that prayers for Numan were divided into four sessions.

Mohammad Ashraf Bhat, tall and broad-shouldered, said he could not fault his son for trying to protect Mr. Ganai.

“The mind says if you jump into fire, you will burn,” he said. “But love doesn’t understand that. If he would not have died like this, he would have died as a militant.”

@sameeryasir.

In Kashmir, Blood and Grief in an Intimate War: ‘These Bodies Are Our Assets’
Aug. 1, 2018

Top U.N. Rights Official Seeks Inquiry on Kashmir Abuses
June 14, 2018

An Epidemic of ‘Dead Eyes’ in Kashmir as India Uses Pellet Guns on Protesters
Aug. 28, 2016

Kashmir Is Paralyzed by an ‘Adored’ Band of Militants
Nov. 14, 2016
Sign[URL='https://defence.pk/pdf/nytimes://reader/id/100000006270971/article']Titles6h[/URL]https://defence.pk/pdf/nytimes://reader/id/100000006269231/article

https://defence.pk/pdf/nytimes://reader/id/100000006275178/article
 
"Numan Ashraf Bhat’s parents, Mohammad Ashraf Bhat and his wife, Naza Bano, at home. “If he would not have died like this, he would have died as a militant,” the father said."

Frustration at its peak...seems nothing for coming generations ....
 
Does it matter in the least?

The only outcome has been hardening of Indian stand vis a vis Kashmiris. And intensification of combat operations against militants. Earlier, IA and security forces would pull back and let mlitants flee to avoid civilian casualties, so as not to anger Indian's in rest of India. Now entirety of Indians see these protesters as militants. The resut, they are shot and liquidated without mercy or sympathy or even too much media coverage. Not worth news time reporting for unarmed militants.

And that is where Kashmiri separatists and their supporters are wrong. No matter how hard or whichever way they protest or fight, it doesn't matter in the least to the Army or GOI or to the bureaucracy. Sure there will be casualties of troops, but honestly there is an extant callous disregard for lives in India. They will crush you harder, more ruthlessly, more inhumanely the harder and more violent the kashmiris make the situation.

The only way India's position changes is if the majority of Indians want and force a change through the ballot. That's the only way anything changes. And the Kashmiris last and only hope.

And that won't happen, not for a long long time. The day the Kashmirs slaughtered and kicked out the pundits is the day they lost India. There is very little sympathy, and no mercy for them. Anymore.
 
More like, separatists are using Kashmiri kids as cannon fodder while living like kings at the expense of the Indian taxpayer and simultaneously sending their own kids to Ivy League Colleges.

cd7e44050449871c5857a2cd292b72807e617c06b587649aea45dc7fa1c1188a.jpg
 
The only outcome has been hardening of Indian stand vis a vis Kashmiris.

Which will in turn grant legitimacy and moral strength to the Kashmiri cause. International sympathy will turn against India in Kashmir, it is only a matter of time.

Just like Afghanistan, Kashmir will of its own accord jump right into Pakistan's open arms.

More like, separatists are using Kashmiri kids as cannon fodder while living like kings at the expense of the Indian taxpayer and simultaneously sending their own kids to Ivy League Colleges.

View attachment 528009

cecc58607444e9b49e82febf310f81fe--peaceful-protest-indian-army.jpg


Biggest Democracy? This is what hypocrisy actually looks like.
 
Which will in turn grant legitimacy and moral strength to the Kashmiri cause. International sympathy will turn against India in Kashmir, it is only a matter of time.

Just like Afghanistan, Kashmir will of its own accord jump right into Pakistan's open arms.

Lol, pakistan's time of stealing kashmir from under India's nose is long gone.

mn.png


Maybe in the 90s, you could have said Kashmir could have fallen for pakistani rhetoric, now it's just wishful thinking.

But do carry on, you have only lost your economy and nearly half your country in the quest for kashmir.

And clearly, Afghanistan is soooo open to pakistan.

Biggest Democracy? This is what hypocrisy actually looks like.

How about, not using kids to pelt stones keep them away from "peaceful" protests.
Unless of course the separatists want the kids to get hurt so as to garner attention.
 
Geography.
Division Area km2 Percentage Area
Kashmir 15,948 15.73%
Jammu 26,293 25.93%
Ladakh 59,146 58.33%
Good luck for independent kashmir !!!
 
Kashmiri facial feautures
2mpkkkg.jpg


Pakistani facial feautures

zahir-article.png


Indian facial features

indian-crowd-takes-pictures-smartphones-footage-085909011_prevstill.jpeg


Which seems closer in physical appearance and dress?
 
Does it matter in the least?

The only outcome has been hardening of Indian stand vis a vis Kashmiris.
And intensification of combat operations against militants. Earlier, IA and security forces would pull back and let mlitants flee to avoid civilian casualties, so as not to anger Indian's in rest of India. Now entirety of Indians see these protesters as militants. The resut, they are shot and liquidated without mercy or sympathy or even too much media coverage. Not worth news time reporting for unarmed militants.

And that is where Kashmiri separatists and their supporters are wrong. No matter how hard or whichever way they protest or fight, it doesn't matter in the least to the Army or GOI or to the bureaucracy. Sure there will be casualties of troops, but honestly there is an extant callous disregard for lives in India. They will crush you harder, more ruthlessly, more inhumanely the harder and more violent the kashmiris make the situation.

The only way India's position changes is if the majority of Indians want and force a change through the ballot. That's the only way anything changes. And the Kashmiris last and only hope.

And that won't happen, not for a long long time. The day the Kashmirs slaughtered and kicked out the pundits is the day they lost India. There is very little sympathy, and no mercy for them. Anymore.
Thank you for accepting that they are not indians and belong to a different nation.
Also this make you illegal occupiers of kashmiri land.
 
Back
Top Bottom