Numbers show twin seat is more popular than single seat

[Yongpeng Sun-Tastaufen]

Su-27 / 35 used by 10 air forces. Su-30 used by 15 air forces. 10 / 15 = two thirds

F-15C used by 4 air forces. F-15E used by 6 air forces. 4 / 6 = two thirds

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sukhoi_Su-27

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sukhoi_Su-35

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McDonnell_Douglas_F-15_Eagle

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McDonnell_Douglas_F-15E_Strike_Eagle

 

[Yongpeng Sun-Tastaufen]

@pakistanipower @nahtanbob @gambit @vostok @F-22Raptor

 

[Ultima Thule]

Su-27 / 35 used by 10 air forces. Su-30 used by 15 air forces. 10 / 15 = two thirds

F-15C used by 4 air forces. F-15E used by 6 air forces. 4 / 6 = two thirds.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sukhoi_Su-27

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sukhoi_Su-35

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McDonnell_Douglas_F-15_Eagle

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McDonnell_Douglas_F-15E_Strike_Eagle

What troll and useless thread its is @undertakerwwefan

 

[untitled]

F-15C used by 4 air forces

The C model of the F15 is no longer in production. When the other countries were cleared for the F15s the 'E Strike Eagle' variants were the only ones being manufactured. And the E variants are multirole as oposed to the air superiorty only C models

 

[Yongpeng Sun-Tastaufen]

The C model of the F15 is no longer in production. When the other countries were cleared for the F15s the 'E Strike Eagle' variants were the only ones being manufactured. And the E variants are multirole as oposed to the air superiorty only C models

F-15X is identical to F-15C. It don't have customer.

 

[Ultima Thule]

F-15X is identical to F-15C. It don't have customer.

likely to if USAF, if it want to replace older F-15C @undertakerwwefan

 

[nahtanbob]

Su-27 / 35 used by 10 air forces. Su-30 used by 15 air forces. 10 / 15 = two thirds

F-15C used by 4 air forces. F-15E used by 6 air forces. 4 / 6 = two thirds

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sukhoi_Su-27

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sukhoi_Su-35

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McDonnell_Douglas_F-15_Eagle

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McDonnell_Douglas_F-15E_Strike_Eagle

since end of cold war the mig sales have plummetted. Sukhoi has filled the gap.
to be fair add f-16s into the mix. a lot of American allies use F-16s to do what Russian clients do with the Sukhois

 

[Yongpeng Sun-Tastaufen]

since end of cold war the mig sales have plummetted. Sukhoi has filled the gap.
to be fair add f-16s into the mix. a lot of American allies use F-16s to do what Russian clients do with the Sukhois

Russia don't have counterpart of F-16. F-16 is single engine. Russia don't make single engine. Russia counterpart of F-18 is MiG-29 / 35, both 2 medium thrust engines.

likely to if USAF, if it want to replace older F-15C @undertakerwwefan

No they won't. F-15X design is too old.

 

[nahtanbob]

Russia don't have counterpart of F-16. F-16 is single engine. Russia don't make single engine. Russia counterpart of F-18 is MiG-29 / 35, both 2 medium thrust engines.

compare sales of f-15, f-16 and f/a-18 to migs and sukhois

 

[Ultima Thule]

Russia don't have counterpart of F-16. F-16 is single engine. Russia don't make single engine. Russia counterpart of F-18 is MiG-29 / 35, both 2 medium thrust engines.

Mig-29 is couterpart of both F-16/F-18, F-16 is also medium weight class fighter like Mig-29 @undertakerwwefan

No they won't. F-15X design is too old.

USAF is considering avionics+radar wise it will become one best jet in the world @undertakerwwefan

 

[Yongpeng Sun-Tastaufen]

Mig-29 is couterpart of both F-16/F-18, F-16 is also medium weight class fighter like Mig-29 @undertakerwwefan

Nope. F-16 is single large engine. F-18 and MiG-29 are 2 medium engines. F-16 is way smaller. Not the same class. Russia don't have counterpart of F-16 just like America don't have counterpart of Kilo submarine. America don't use diesel powered submarines.

compare sales of f-15, f-16 and f/a-18 to migs and sukhois

F-15, F-16 not the same company. MiG and Su are the same company merged under UAC in 2006.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Aircraft_Corporation

USAF is considering avionics+radar wise it will become one best jet in the world @undertakerwwefan

Too big radar signature.

 

[Ultima Thule]

Too big radar signature.

And Su-30/27 also have too big radar signature @undertakerwwefan

Nope. F-16 is single large engine. F-18 and MiG-29 are 2 medium engines. F-16 is way smaller. Not the same class. Russia don't have counterpart of F-16 just like America don't have counterpart of Kilo submarine. America don't use diesel powered submarines.

Yes in weight class is comparable to F-16 @undertakerwwefan

 

[Yongpeng Sun-Tastaufen]

And Su-30/27 also have too big radar signature @undertakerwwefan

That's because they don't need small radar signature.

Yes in weight class is comparable to F-16 @undertakerwwefan

Nobody cares about weight. You can make a plane in gold and weigh a lot.

 

[Ultima Thule]

That's because they don't need small radar signature.

So does F-15 @undertakerwwefan

Nobody cares about weight. You can make a plane in gold and weigh a lot.

Only you don't care but experts and professionals does care about weight @undertakerwwefan

 

[Yongpeng Sun-Tastaufen]

So does F-15 @undertakerwwefan

True. The only people America need to fight are Qaeda fags.

Only you don't care but experts and professionals does care about weight @undertakerwwefan

You need size to carry missile. Only big planes like Su-30 and Su-57 can carry BrahMos.