What's new

Nobel Prize for Assange?

Should Assange be nominated for the Nobel Prize?


  • Total voters
    19

Abhishek_

BANNED
Joined
Aug 18, 2010
Messages
5,404
Reaction score
-5
Country
India
Location
Taiwan, Province Of China
I was reading some news when I came across the following

Meanwhile, in a calculated dig at the U.S. -- whose cables described Moscow as a corrupt “mafia state” -- the Russian president praised Mr. Assange. “Public and nongovernmental organizations should think of how to help him,” a source inside Dmitry Medvedev’s office told Russian news agencies, adding: “Maybe, nominate him as a Nobel prize laureate.”

How many people here think Assange should be nominated for a Nobel Prize?
 
.
i do think so... mainly for his courage in opening up declassified documents.. and encouraging transparency ..
 
. .
Absolutely yes.. support Julian Assanj and strengthen his stance, we need 100s of more to expose under-cover governments. I don't know about other countries but for Pakistan, Julian Assanj is nothing short of Hero.
 
.
A snitch is a snitch there can never be any honor in that
 
.
Wikileaks may spark more wars than end them... So no.

By exposing conspiracies, you kill them instead of making them stronger.. and a world without conspiracies and under-cover governments would be a better world for everybody.. even for Americans this leaking is good if they are able to think some. Its not the wealth or weaponry that makes a country strong, its Principles and Character that do so and America needs to have them both.
 
.
Russia wants Nobel peace price for Assange

12-9-2010_6569_l_u.gif




LONDON: Russia has suggested that Julian Assange, editor in chief of WikiLeaks should be awarded the Nobel peace prize, The Guardian reported on its website Thursday.

In what appears to be a calculated dig at the US, the Kremlin urged non-governmental organisations to think seriously about "nominating Assange as a Nobel Prize laureate".

"Public and non-governmental organisations should think of how to help him," the source from inside president Dmitry Medvedev's office told Russian news agencies. Speaking in Brussels, where Medvedev was attending a Russia-EU summit yesterday , the source went on: "Maybe, nominate him as a Nobel Prize laureate."

Russia's reflexively suspicious leadership appears to have come round to WikiLeaks, having decided that the ongoing torrent of disclosures are ultimately far more damaging and disastrous to America's long-term geopolitical interests than they are to Russia's.

The Kremlin's initial reaction to stories dubbing Russia a corrupt "mafia state" and kleptocracy was, predictably, negative. Last week Medvedev's spokesman dubbed the revelations "not worthy of comment" while Putin raged that a US diplomatic cable comparing him to Batman and Medvedev to Robin was "arrogant" and "unethical". State TV ignored the claims.

Subsequent disclosures, however, that Nato had secretly prepared a plan in case Russia invaded its Baltic neighbours have left the Kremlin smarting. Today Russia's foreign minister Sergei Lavrov said Nato had to explain why it privately considered Russia an enemy while publicly describing it warmly as a "strategic partner" and ally.

Nato should make clear its position on WikiLeaks cables published by the Guardian alleging that the alliance had devised plans to defend Poland, Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia against Russia, Lavrov said.

"With one hand, Nato seeks agreement with us on joint partnership, and with the other, it makes a decision that it needs to defend. So when is Nato more sincere?" Lavrov asked today. "We have asked these questions and are expecting answers to them. We think we are entitled to that."

Lavrov said his attitude towards the leaked US state department cables was "philosophical". "It is interesting to read, including what ambassadors write to provide a stream of information to their capitals," he admitted.

Dmitry Rogozin, Russia's hardline ultra-nationalist ambassador to Nato, also today voiced his support for the embattled Assange. He tweeted that Assange's arrest and incarceration on Monday at the City of Westminster magistrates' court demonstrated that there was "no media freedom" in the west. Assange's "fate" amounted to "political persecution" and a lack of human rights, the ambassador said.

In London, meanwhile, Russia's chargé d'affaires and acting ambassador in the UK, Alexander Sternik, said relations with Britain had improved since the coalition came to power. He complained, however, about the hostile reaction in the British media after Fifa's executive committee voted that Russia – and not England – should host the 2018 World Cup.

In a briefing to journalists this morning, Sternik said: "While the English bid was technically a strong one, the Russian bid was in line with the well-known Fifa philosophy of opening new frontiers for world football. The vote result was therefore quite logical, and while the disappointment of many in England is understandable, the media outrage was a step too far. It's not cricket, as the English say."

Russia wants Nobel peace price for Assange
 
. .
A small self centred man that once a long time ago cared about truth and transparency now he sounds like a spoilt child demanding attention.

If any one touches me ill ill bring down major banks and cause mass chaos, lol does it sound like a man who gives a **** for any thing but him self who gets hurt who gets killed does not matter to him aslong as the ASSange fan club keeps rolling.
 
.
A small self centred man that once a long time ago cared about truth and transparency now he sounds like a spoilt child demanding attention.

If any one touches me ill ill bring down major banks and cause mass chaos, lol does it sound like a man who gives a **** for any thing but him self who gets hurt who gets killed does not matter to him aslong as the ASSange fan club keeps rolling.

I would love to see a Nobel prize for Assange. It would a great chance for the west to demonstrate it is giving out the prize based on its principles. Hell I'll support the release of Liu Xiaobo if they do award Assange a Nobel.

Whatever your personal dislikes for him I suspect doesn't stem from him personally. It would be like me saying Liu Xiaobo's principles are wrong because I don't like his haircut.
 
.
I do have to admit some personal bias, that yes i do not like the guy.
Ive delt with the type before, all he has done is post stolen sensitive material on a web site and threatened to harm even more people if any one does any thing to stop him.

Its not about the leaks its about him, look at me im the great Julian ASSange.

You have all this vital data that must be released for the good of mankind,fine dump it all and walk away but no he drip feeds snippets month by month so people keep paying attention to him feeding his desire for self agrandisment.

Any one that disagrees with holy Julian is sacked, as he can do no wrong. The people killed by the taliban because they were identified as informants well thats some one elses fault or it didnt happen.

If the leaks were from we the anonamus wikileak people he might have some credability but its all look at me.

As for the leaks well 99% of it isnt new 1% is hurtfull harmfull and dangerous 0% so far has been vital information for the freedom of the world.

Standing up for ASSange isnt supporting the little guy its backing
the playground bully.
 
.
I do have to admit some personal bias, that yes i do not like the guy.
Ive delt with the type before, all he has done is post stolen sensitive material on a web site and threatened to harm even more people if any one does any thing to stop him.

Its not about the leaks its about him, look at me im the great Julian ASSange.

You have all this vital data that must be released for the good of mankind,fine dump it all and walk away but no he drip feeds snippets month by month so people keep paying attention to him feeding his desire for self agrandisment.

Any one that disagrees with holy Julian is sacked, as he can do no wrong. The people killed by the taliban because they were identified as informants well thats some one elses fault or it didnt happen.

If the leaks were from we the anonamus wikileak people he might have some credability but its all look at me.

As for the leaks well 99% of it isnt new 1% is hurtfull harmfull and dangerous 0% so far has been vital information for the freedom of the world.

Standing up for ASSange isnt supporting the little guy its backing
the playground bully.

I can write something similar about my dislike for Liu Xiaobo's methods and his anti-Chinese culture ideas.


But can't because have to study. So I'll just say Wikileaks is dribbling the material because there are something like 300,000 documents? and also Assange offered to work with the US government to filter the material being release. The US government declined on the grounds that it would be collaborating and condoning his activities.
 
. .
I do have to admit some personal bias, that yes i do not like the guy.
Ive delt with the type before, all he has done is post stolen sensitive material on a web site and threatened to harm even more people if any one does any thing to stop him.

Its not about the leaks its about him, look at me im the great Julian ASSange.

You have all this vital data that must be released for the good of mankind,fine dump it all and walk away but no he drip feeds snippets month by month so people keep paying attention to him feeding his desire for self agrandisment.

Any one that disagrees with holy Julian is sacked, as he can do no wrong. The people killed by the taliban because they were identified as informants well thats some one elses fault or it didnt happen.

If the leaks were from we the anonamus wikileak people he might have some credability but its all look at me.

As for the leaks well 99% of it isnt new 1% is hurtfull harmfull and dangerous 0% so far has been vital information for the freedom of the world.

Standing up for ASSange isnt supporting the little guy its backing
the playground bully.

You are going out on a limb to describe him, uncorrorobated. Kinda a makes you a part of the status quo.

I do agree 99% of its is not new. Anybody who keeps up with the realpolitik of the world would know that.
 
.
You are going out on a limb to describe him, uncorrorobated. Kinda a makes you a part of the status quo.

I do agree 99% of its is not new. Anybody who keeps up with the realpolitik of the world would know that.

Yeah I think the biggest surprise about wikileak release is that they contain no surprises at all.
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom