What's new

'No such understanding in place': FO on report claiming US nearing deal to use Pakistan's airspace

HAIDER

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
May 21, 2006
Messages
33,771
Reaction score
14
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
'No such understanding in place': FO on report claiming US nearing deal to use Pakistan's airspace
Naveed SiddiquiPublished October 23, 2021 - Updated about 3 hours ago
Facebook Count
Twitter Share

7
A US drone can be seen in this picture. — AFP/File

A US drone can be seen in this picture. — AFP/File
The Foreign Office (FO) on Saturday issued a statement on a CNN report claiming that a formal agreement for the use of Pakistan’s airspace by the United States to conduct military strikes in Afghanistan was close, clarifying that there was "no such understanding" between the two countries.
CNN, in its report, cited three "sources familiar with the details of a classified briefing" to the US Congress, and said that the Biden administration has informed US lawmakers that the country was close to striking a formal deal with Pakistan for the use of its airspace to conduct operations in Afghanistan.
The report claimed that Pakistan had "expressed a desire" to sign a Memorandum of Understanding in return for help in its own counterterrorism operations and assistance with managing the relationship with India.
The report said that according to a source, the negotiations were still underway and the details of the agreement, which have not yet been hammered out, were still subject to change.
Hours after the CNN report was published, the FO issued a statement.
"No such understanding was in place," the FO spokesperson said in response to queries about whether the country's airspace would be used to conduct military and intelligence operations in the neighbouring country.
The spokesperson, however, stressed that Pakistan and the US had "longstanding cooperation" on issues of regional security and counter-terrorism and "the two sides remain engaged in regular consultations".
Pakistan will ‘absolutely not’ allow bases to US: PM Imran
In June in an interview with Axios on HBO, Prime Minister Imran Khan had categorically said that Pakistan would “absolutely not” allow any bases and use of its territory to the US for any sort of action inside Afghanistan — his clear-cut response surprising the interviewer.
"Pakistan suffered 70,000 casualties, more than any other country by joining the American war. We cannot afford any more military actions from our territory. We will be partners in peace, not in conflict," the prime minister had said.
Asked whether Pakistan would allow the US Air Force to use its airspace for airstrikes against the Taliban, the premier had reiterated that Pakistan "would not be a part of any conflict". When pushed for an answer, he had replied that it had not been discussed. "Why would the Americans bomb Afghanistan when it hasn't worked for 20 years?"
Foreign Minister Shah Mahmood Qureshi in May had also ruled out the possibility of providing military bases to the US for counterterrorism operations in Afghanistan.
He had rejected as unfounded the reports to this effect and made it clear that the government would never provide military bases to the US, nor would allow drone attacks inside Pakistan.
US concern about growing IS threat
The US has been concerned about the rise of the militant Islamic State (IS) group in Afghanistan in the wake of its withdrawal from the country. The IS-Khorasan chapter claimed responsibility for an attack on Kabul's airport in August that had killed scores.
The group has also claimed responsibility for a spate of attacks in Afghanistan in the past month against the country's Shia community.
A report by the Bloomberg news agency had noted that after fighting each other for 20 years, the US and Taliban “are suddenly finding their interests aligned against a common enemy”.
The report included a quote by US President Joe Biden, saying that it’s “in the interest of the Taliban that in fact ISIS-K does not metastasise beyond what it is”.
The report noted that the arrangement was “awkward for both the US and the Taliban,” although each wants to prevent Afghanistan from turning into a key staging ground for IS.
The Taliban have ruled out cooperation with the US to contain extremist groups in Afghanistan, staking out an uncompromising position on a key issue.
Taliban’s political spokesman Suhail Shaheen said there would be no cooperation with Washington on containing the increasingly active IS in Afghanistan. “We are able to tackle Daesh independently,” Shaheen said, when asked whether the Taliban would work with the US to contain an IS affiliate. He used an Arabic acronym for IS.
 
. .
So no understanding as of now. But no rebuttal on talks going on part
 
.
Bus ho gai tasdeeq. Bus bhana chaie is qoum ko government ko galian nikalna ka lia bagari tasdeeq ka.
 
.
Remember when Pakistan publicly condemned drone attack on its territory but privately condoned it? And what about the OBL raid: did Pakistan know or not?

Let’s face the truth, Pakistan is playing a shell game with its citizens. And if there is such a deal in the works,Pakistan’s awam will be the last to know.
 
.
It's over thousands miles porous border. But ..... IS been active for the last 20 years between Pak-Afghan border and in Baluchistan attacking Pak security personal.
Remember when Pakistan publicly condemned drone attack on its territory but privately condoned it? And what about the OBL raid: did Pakistan know or not?

Let’s face the truth, Pakistan is playing a shell game with its citizens. And if there is such a deal in the works,Pakistan’s awam will be the last to know.
OBL was all understanding between Pak-US. Otherwise Pakistan would face massive sanctions. After OBL debacle Pak-US armed forces interaction and training increased. PAF training and new equipment provided to PAF.
 
.
Well it wont be a surprise if imran khan takes yet another u turn. Afterall he has taken u turn on each and everything he has ever said. We also know the brown saab mentality of our generals and bureaucrats.
 
.
Well it wont be a surprise if imran khan takes yet another u turn. Afterall he has taken u turn on each and everything he has ever said. We also know the brown saab mentality of our generals and bureaucrats.

Not IK but Bajwa MAY turn out to be the one making deals with the US.
 
.
Assistance in managing relations with india? Nothing is more pathetic than this particular line. Is this true?
 
.
It's over thousands miles porous border. But ..... IS been active for the last 20 years between Pak-Afghan border and in Baluchistan attacking Pak security personal.

OBL was all understanding between Pak-US. Otherwise Pakistan would face massive sanctions. After OBL debacle Pak-US armed forces interaction and training increased. PAF training and new equipment provided to PAF.
20 years?

IS emerged in 2014.
TTP emerged in 2007.
BLA emerged in the 1980s.

There is history of agreements and disagreements between USA and Pakistan.

OBL episode does not add up on many counts. Pakistan have never admitted support in its reports (and jailed Dr. Shakil Afridi). Parliament was briefed in private which is uncommon. A lot happened in 2011 which did not align with perceptions on the surface. Raymond Davis episode and Salala happened before and after.

Pakistan and USA had backdoor understanding in regards to UAV strikes on a broader level. Some of the UAV strikes were not agreed upon, however.

It was mixed experience on the whole.

Pakistani Public have mixed views. Members of this Forum have mixed views. There is no consensus building in regards to Pakistan's role in War On Terror and how it panned out.
 
.
If there is no understanding, sue CNN through embassy.

CNN is reporting what US Gov has released to it - suing would be beneficial if CNN claimed it was Pakistani sources.

It's US propaganda to turn China and Taliban against Pakistan.
 
.
There must be something in the air. Given the circumstances, some understanding is the call of the day. Let’s see how far Pak has developed her negotiations skills when many factors are indeed in favor of her….

My suggestions:
Pak shouldn’t compromise on her geo-economics and interconnection doctrines
Pak needs to leverage the Hindutva RSS genocidal extremism in India
Acceptance of the de facto Taliban government in Afganistan by all quarters
Getting out of FATF grey list
Military cooperation should be limited to intelligence sharing and maintenance of F-16s only
A very tight and close joint supervision mechanism for airspace usage
Etc.
 
Last edited:
. .
'No such understanding in place': FO on report claiming US nearing deal to use Pakistan's airspace



The Foreign Office (FO) on Saturday issued a statement on a CNN report claiming that a formal agreement for the use of Pakistan’s airspace by the United States to conduct military strikes in Afghanistan was close, clarifying that there was "no such understanding" between the two countries.

CNN, in its report, cited three "sources familiar with the details of a classified briefing" to the US Congress, and said that the Biden administration has informed US lawmakers that the country was close to striking a formal deal with Pakistan for the use of its airspace to conduct operations in Afghanistan.

The report claimed that Pakistan had "expressed a desire" to sign a Memorandum of Understanding in return for help in its own counterterrorism operations and assistance with managing the relationship with India.

The report said that according to a source, the negotiations were still underway and the details of the agreement, which have not yet been hammered out, were still subject to change.


Hours after the CNN report was published, the FO issued a statement.

"No such understanding was in place," the FO spokesperson said in response to queries about whether the country's airspace would be used to conduct military and intelligence operations in the neighbouring country.

The spokesperson, however, stressed that Pakistan and the US had "longstanding cooperation" on issues of regional security and counter-terrorism and "the two sides remain engaged in regular consultations".

Pakistan will ‘absolutely not’ allow bases to US: PM Imran
In June in an interview with Axios on HBO, Prime Minister Imran Khan had categorically said that Pakistan would “absolutely not” allow any bases and use of its territory to the US for any sort of action inside Afghanistan — his clear-cut response surprising the interviewer.

"Pakistan suffered 70,000 casualties, more than any other country by joining the American war. We cannot afford any more military actions from our territory. We will be partners in peace, not in conflict," the prime minister had said.

Asked whether Pakistan would allow the US Air Force to use its airspace for airstrikes against the Taliban, the premier had reiterated that Pakistan "would not be a part of any conflict". When pushed for an answer, he had replied that it had not been discussed. "Why would the Americans bomb Afghanistan when it hasn't worked for 20 years?"

Foreign Minister Shah Mahmood Qureshi in May had also ruled out the possibility of providing military bases to the US for counterterrorism operations in Afghanistan.

He had rejected as unfounded the reports to this effect and made it clear that the government would never provide military bases to the US, nor would allow drone attacks inside Pakistan.

US concern about growing IS threat
The US has been concerned about the rise of the militant Islamic State (IS) group in Afghanistan in the wake of its withdrawal from the country. The IS-Khorasan chapter claimed responsibility for an attack on Kabul's airport in August that had killed scores.

The group has also claimed responsibility for a spate of attacks in Afghanistan in the past month against the country's Shia community.

A report by the Bloomberg news agency had noted that after fighting each other for 20 years, the US and Taliban “are suddenly finding their interests aligned against a common enemy”.

The report included a quote by US President Joe Biden, saying that it’s “in the interest of the Taliban that in fact ISIS-K does not metastasise beyond what it is”.

The report noted that the arrangement was “awkward for both the US and the Taliban,” although each wants to prevent Afghanistan from turning into a key staging ground for IS.

The Taliban have ruled out cooperation with the US to contain extremist groups in Afghanistan, staking out an uncompromising position on a key issue.

Taliban’s political spokesman Suhail Shaheen said there would be no cooperation with Washington on containing the increasingly active IS in Afghanistan. “We are able to tackle Daesh independently,” Shaheen said, when asked whether the Taliban would work with the US to contain an IS affiliate. He used an Arabic acronym for IS.





:coffee: It will disturb peace in region

The game played in Syria won't be replayed near Pakistani borders
 
Last edited:
. .

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom