What's new

'No reward' for non-nuclear Libya

Cheetah786

PDF VETERAN
Joined
Aug 23, 2006
Messages
9,002
Reaction score
-3
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi has said his country has not been given adequate compensation for its decision to renounce nuclear weapons in 2003Speaking to the BBC, Colonel Gaddafi said the failure by the West to reward Libya meant Iran and North Korea were reluctant to follow Tripoli's lead.
He insisted there would be no return to the confrontation of the past, however.
Sanctions were lifted after Libya ended its nuclear weapons programme, and the US and UK have resumed diplomatic ties.
Libya was also removed from the US list of state sponsors of terror, a major step towards international rehabilitation.
Investment promise
owever, Col Gaddafi says the West has not properly compensated his country because it has failed to transform its nuclear weapons programme into nuclear power. Speaking to BBC diplomatic correspondent James Robbins, Col Gaddafi said this meant the West had lost bargaining power with countries like Iran and North Korea.
"This should be a model to be followed, but Libya is disappointed because the promises given by America and Britain were not fulfilled," he said.
"And therefore those countries said 'we are not going to follow Libya's example because Libya abolished its programme without any compensation'."
Mr Gaddafi said that the US and Britain had a duty to help Libya develop civilian nuclear power plants.
"They said if you abolish your war programme we will help you to develop your nuclear abilities into peaceful ones. This has not happened."
Our correspondent says the Libyan leader may have been bargaining for foreign investment, but a return to hostility does not seem to be on the cards.
'International dictatorship'
Col Gaddafi spoke to the BBC as celebrations were taking place to mark the 30th anniversary of his declaration of Libya's unique system of "popular rule".
He also held a rare public debate with Western scholars, in which he criticised the control that nations with military and economic power held over poorer countries.
It was a pragmatic desire to avoid being destroyed by the "international dictatorship" of such powers that had persuaded Libya to improve its relations with the world, he added.
Col Gaddafi's remarks come as six major powers - the US, Russia, China, the UK, France and Germany - discuss possible further sanctions against Iran over its refusal to halt its nuclear programme.
US officials have said ambassadors to the UN could begin drafting a new resolution on Iran next week.
Meanwhile, North Korea last month agreed at six-party talks to take the first steps towards nuclear disarmament, in return for economic and fuel aid.
Pressure to find a solution to the nuclear issue increased after Pyongyang conducted its first atomic test in October.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/6414387.stm

Stabbed people in the back still got nothing.Best part no one will help him now.:rofl:
 
.
Their reward is that they didn't got annihilated by Tomahawk & Cluster bombs.
 
. .
Their reward is that they didn't got annihilated by Tomahawk & Cluster bombs.

yeah life like a dog is preferred way to live excellent.master tell you when to sit and when to play dead.i say its hell of a reward.and it looks like he is enjoying it to.:rofl:
 
. .
these were the guys that gave the IAEA A.Q khans name. we should have never cooperated with this guy. i think we should send a few ISI boys, over start an insurgency and remove this pathetic excuse of a leader out of power or atleast send a SSG team to assisinate this guy that will show everyone in the world not to give information that is harmful to pakistans interests.:sniper:
 
.
Com'on guys stay realistic. What A.Q. Khan did for Pakistan help us become a nuclear power but he should not be glorified for his clandestine dealings with rogue countries like North Korea, Iran or Lybia. It's still beyond my comprehension what made him do that and put us in such a difficult and shameful situation as we are today! :mad:

Lybia on the other hand has played a very significant role in the early years of our nuclear programme.
Lybia provided almost $500 million in 1975-77 for our nuclear infrastructure, without this kind of money we would not have completed Kahuta or other nuclear facilities in such short time.

India detonated the nuke in May 1974, ten years after the Chinese and Bhutto wanted to achieve the capability within ten years after India. We bacame nuclear capable in 1986...just two years behind the set timelimit.
 
.
Neo brother, you definatley knew somehing we were unaware of.:tup:
 
.
Com'on guys stay realistic. What A.Q. Khan did for Pakistan help us become a nuclear power but he should not be glorified for his clandestine dealings with rogue countries like North Korea, Iran or Lybia. It's still beyond my comprehension what made him do that and put us in such a difficult and shameful situation as we are today
!

we should be ashamed of it for what reason.cause Americans have the right to decide who can and who cant have nukes.they can sell it to whom ever they like.yet if others do it its a shameful act.common man


Lybia on the other hand has played a very significant role in the early years of our nuclear programme.
Lybia provided almost $500 million in 1975-77 for our nuclear infrastructure, without this kind of money we would not have completed Kahuta or other nuclear facilities in such short time
.
Interesting could you please provide some kind of link to it.cause most here were pointing to wards Saudis and know Libya.i would love to read up on it.

India detonated the nuke in May 1974, ten years after the Chinese and Bhutto wanted to achieve the capability within ten years after India. We bacame nuclear capable in 1986...just two years behind the set timelimit
.
And thats why we should be forever proud of A-Q khan.our hero will always be.:flag: :flag: :flag:
 
.
we should be ashamed of it for what reason.cause Americans have the right to decide who can and who cant have nukes.they can sell it to whom ever they like.yet if others do it its a shameful act.common man
Two wrongs don't make a right Cheetah though I understand where you're coming from.
.
Interesting could you please provide some kind of link to it.cause most here were pointing to wards Saudis and know Libya.i would love to read up on it.
I'll try to find some reliable link but I have the info from first hand. Most of it is classified anyway.
Saudi's have been helpfull in many fields aswell including our nuclear programmes and military equipement.
.
And thats why we should be forever proud of A-Q khan.our hero will always be.:flag: :flag: :flag:
You got me wrong there, I am proud and thankfull for his achievements. I just don't approve his dealings with other countries.
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom