What's new

No military funds for Pakistan without specific actions

Perpendicular

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Jun 29, 2015
Messages
871
Reaction score
-3
Country
India
Location
Australia
WASHINGTON: Key members of Congress are not prepared to support military aid to Pakistan without some specific actions and the Obama administration has to follow their decision, says the US State Department.

At a Thursday afternoon news briefing in Washington, a State Department official, Elizabeth Trudeau, pointed out that the US administration also wanted Pakistan to act against the Haqqani network.

“Key members of Congress have been clear they’re not prepared to support US military aid to Pakistan absent some specific actions,” she said.

Ms Trudeau said the United States had clearly conveyed its views to Pakistan on the activities of the Haqqani network and Islamabad knew what to do.

“Pakistan has spoken that they will not discriminate against [militant] groups. We could encourage them to continue to live up to that,” she said when asked if the State Department was willing to certify that Pakistan had taken the ‘specific actions’ needed to justify releasing military funds to the country.

The statement coincided with a debate in the Pakistani parliament where Adviser on Foreign Affairs Sartaj Aziz conceded that relations with the US had been under stress for the past three months.

Last week, a US congressional panel endorsed a move to block $450 million of military aid to Pakistan for failing to take action against the Haqqani network. And late last month, US senators stopped the administration from using foreign military financing for subsidising sale of eight F-16s to Pakistan.

Responding to another question, Ms Trudeau said that while only Congress could explain its position on the issue, the administration was “committed to working with Congress to deliver security assistance to our partners and allies”.

Doing so, she added, “furthers US goals by building capacity to meet shared security challenges”.

When asked if the Obama administration and Congress were on the same page on the matter, Ms Trudeau said: “We continue to work with Congress,” making it clear that the administration on its own could not release the funds.

After improving a bit, relations between Pakistan and the US began to deteriorate again early this year when Pakistan’s efforts to persuade Taliban to join Afghan reconciliation talks failed.

Some analysts say that Pakistan does not have enough influence on the Taliban to persuade them to accept a peace deal. They argue that the militants will only join peace talks if they realise that they cannot win the war.

The Americans argue that Pakistan can play an effective role in making the Taliban realise their own vulnerability by taking direct military action against those who are hiding inside its borders.

Published in Dawn, May 14th, 2016
 
. .
Key members of Congress are not prepared to support military aid to Pakistan without some specific actions and the Obama administration has to follow their decision,
U.S. and Pakistan were partners in WOT

Why Americans have suddenly started treating Pakistan as contractual employee.

OR Uncle Sam is just playing games to get what it wants and Pakistan is playing hard ball and avoiding doing what is being demanded of them.
 
.
U.S. and Pakistan were partners in WOT

Why Americans have suddenly started treating Pakistan as contractual employee.

OR Uncle Sam is just playing games to get what it wants and Pakistan is playing hard ball and avoiding doing what is being demanded of them.
You have properly answered your question in the last sentence. :coffee:.
 
.
Good. Time to stop arming Pakistan for free at the very least for South Asian stability.
 
.
U.S. and Pakistan were partners in WOT

Why Americans have suddenly started treating Pakistan as contractual employee.

OR Uncle Sam is just playing games to get what it wants and Pakistan is playing hard ball and avoiding doing what is being demanded of them.

Agreed............. Last line is ore than enough to expain current PAK and US relationship status
 
. . . .
Good. Time to stop arming Pakistan for free at the very least for South Asian stability.

How come buttressing Pakistan, a country that has perennially been at a position of relative strategic disadvantage both economically and militarily by virtue of its relative smaller size, result in destabilizing South-Asia? If anything, it tends to balance out the increasingly dis-coherent strategic equation between the two countries and contributes towards establishing a semblance of parity, leading to reduced potential of future military engagement between the belligerent rivals.
 
.
Time to tell US to F off, specially their Congress. The writing was on the wall all along, if we chose to ignore it that is our fault. The F16 mafia in the PAF needs to be told no more fucking F16s. They are not with our dignity and self respect and most importantly our strategic interest. Work with what you have and make JF17 on Pat with F16s till the time we have enough resources to acquire a new platform and get rid of this curse called F16.
 
.
Yeah Fkuk off USA. Go kiss Indian rear., while they reject your pethatic beggary of trying to sell F-18 to them, suits you :lol:
 
.
At this point Pakistan doesnt need US funds they have another cash cow called Expats whose remitances are growing more than a billion USD every year and I think it was 21 billion last year...so now they are in the position to play hard ball with US, for defense requirements they have China and slowly russia is also opening up.
 
.
After $100 billion in losses compared to only $18 billion received in aid and 60000+ people killed in the war on terror and this is what we get we should seriously consider relations with the United States. America is merely the big bully of the world and it always has been.
 
.
i pray that we never get aid from US.. We dont need more enemy for few millions in aids.. ask your new girlfriend india for your dirty jobs.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom