What's new

No IAF Aircraft reached Balakot

I think India used the Israeli made Spice bomb to launch the attacks.
 
.
Sir action speaks louder than words, what could have happened or was going to happen does not matter anymore what matters is what happened and what our response will be.
I am just saying you cant blame one institute for the decisions taken by the whole command.

Give me a summary, was there no CAP in the air at that time?
There were more than one CAP flights in the air
 
.
Aaj din bhar se itna jawab diya hai media mein ...ki pakistanis bhi confuse ho gaye hai ki howa kya hai aakhir...
abb to chen se sonedo ..kaho piyo...bati bhujaho...aur mast ho kar so jao...yeh sab to chata rehta hai ...



As per your DGISPR claims you already pushed IAF out...thats the retaliation ...that IK was taking about....so you already striked and failed the mission...now that nothing happened ...why do you want to strike ?




Well out of four bombs acceptance, only location of one is shared...lets see what more comes out or gets hidden in days to come...
If no major damage, nothing critical happen, then why war mongering...badla lenge....
Is it so hard to release the reconnaissance pod images
Otherwise we have this proof look at sec 45-47
 
.
I am just saying you cant blame one institute for the decisions taken by the whole command.
Who said anything about blaming, we blame later, in this moment in time, we stand with our armed forces. Also was for the whole command, i think now the whole command including the PM has ordered that we will respond, should clear any doubts in the mind of any who believe otherwise. We await that response.
 
.
If we didn't start the nuclear war for them to drop their SOW towards the direction of Abbotabad where we have got our sensitive installations, they wont start the nuclear as well. As I said, select a politically sensitive target, like RSS installation and destroy it.
As I said enemy wont wait to know whether its a nuclear armed missile or not.They will launch nuclear missile in response for sure.Be it us or them
 
. .
Who said anything about blaming, we blame later, in this moment in time, we stand with our armed forces. Also was for the whole command, i think now the whole command including the PM has ordered that we will respond, should clear any doubts in the mind of any who believe otherwise. We await that response.
Well maybe not you but a lot of people are blaming PAF...
 
. . . .
Stand off ammunition can go up till 300+ km..Pakistan rocket assited glide bomb can go 120km..simple attaching a kit to a dumb bomb will hit 60+ km..so strikes cant be stopped by either side
 
.
They have reached close to their target but fails to hit it at Jabba (Balakot) not just 3 or 4 kms brother, accept PAF's stance of no fighting with India since Kargill.

PAF had a history of favoring India, Asghar Khan informed India in 60s that Pakistan is going to launch an attack to their counterpart.
PAF also has a history of history of defeating IAF in both the major wars of 65 and 71 .dont quote examples which support your non sense.
 
.
Is it so hard to release the reconnaissance pod images
Otherwise we have this proof look at sec 45-47

Dont go by what media sells, they can sell my diwali crackers videos for attacks on pakistan.
India doesnt need to show case whats been done and hows been done, it objective was to do a premtive strike and safeguard country and not to feed the media content for pleasure. For that there are plenty of funny chaps trying to mint money out of any action that india takes.
 
.
Pakistan's radars were jammed by IAF during airstrike in Balakot
The Pakistan Air Force failed to detect the presence of the Indian fighter jets as it was already too late for them as their surveillance system had been jammed by the IAF during its raid at Balakot militant camp early on Tuesday, sources said.
IAF-AIrstrike-PTI.jpg

Approximately 300 terrorists were killed in the Air Force strike at Balakot. (Representational Image: PTI)

NEW DELHI: The Pakistan Air Force failed to detect the presence of the Indian fighter jets as it was already too late for them as their surveillance system had been jammed by the IAF during its raid at Balakot militant camp early on Tuesday, sources said. The Indian package had at least two jets mounted with electronic warfare (EW) system that helped jam the Pakistani radars.

A "package" in military terms refers to grouping of various types of jets with different functions. A package typically consists of EW jets, the bombers and the protector jets that secure the bombers from enemy jets as bombers themselves are not in a position to effectively retaliate thanks to heavy payload.



A package usually consists of a minimum of 10-12 and maximum of 39-40 fighter jets, depending upon the requirements of the operation at hand.

In the Tuesday's "non-military preemptive" strike, the IAF used 10-12 Mirage 2000 multi-role aircraft of which at least three were bombers.

In the Indian package, usually Su-30 and Mig 29 jets are used as protectors. But they were possibly not used in Tuesday's opration as Mirage is a multirole aircraft that can act as a bomber, protector and an EW carrier.

The Mirage 2000 bombers used guided bombs with GPS coordinates fed into them to strike with precision and avoid any collateral damage.

The Mirage jets were chosen for the mission as this particular guided bomb system can be used with Mirage only, sources said.

Later, at an all-party meet in the national capital on Tuesday evening, the leaders cutting across party lines praised the Indian Air Force for its precision and professionalism as it hit the terrorist launch pad without incurring any loss to civilian life or hitting any Pakistani military target.

Sources in the Defence Ministry said that Pakistan has "very limited" options to retaliate short of inciting a fullfledged war which it can possibly not afford.

"Clearly, they cannot hit back in a similar way as they have no targets on our side of LoC. We don't have any terror camps here which they can hit. If they hit an Indian military target, they would have no jus ad bellum (a set of criteria that are to be consulted before engaging in war in order to determine whether entering into war is permissible, that is, whether it is a just war). It would mean sparking a fullfledged war," a senior official told IANS on condition of anonymity.

"Pakistan may resort to terror strikes, but in that case it cannot take the ownership. That means it cannot tell its people that it has done that. Also, it will again invoke a retaliatory action from India," the official said.

"One of the achievements of this strike is, apart from destroying a terrorist launch pad and avenging Pulwama attack, India has driven home the point that it can act with 'conventional' means against subconventional warfare by Pakistan," he added.

He said that at most Pakistan could perhaps scale up firing at Line of Control (LoC).

True to India's asseasment, Pakistan on Tuesday evening resorted to heavy firing and shelling in Akhnoor, Nowshera and Krishna Ghati sectors along the LoC in ceasefire violation.
 
.
Is it so hard to release the reconnaissance pod images
Otherwise we have this proof look at sec 45-47
Says all about the gullible Indian nation, how their media feeds them with just want to see and believe even if it's PAF F-16s doing night flypast.
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom