'No direct role of Army in July 25 elections,' DG ISPR tells Senate committee

[war&peace]

@war&peace need basic lessons in English language. DGISPR didn't say army has no role in elections but "No Direct Role" which is same as having 'Indirect Role'

It is not about your interpretations...rather the integrity of the news....The news should be reported as it is so don't argue and I know you very well ....You have been harping this narrative for quite some time and this is your malicious attempt to create a chasm between the nation and the army.

 

[graphican]

@Norwegian,

How low can you get to support a political face? How low can people get and down to which depths to save a person who gets abused in Kabbah and in Masjid-e-Nabvi. Nawaz and Zardari are abused by people when they try to do Haj and who is insulted in the house of honour is among least respected.

Who Allah insults, you cannot glorify, but I am surprised to find how low can people get and against their own country's military forces because they have a political bias. Shameful, indeed shameful!

 

[war&peace]

https://www.dawn.com/news/1421094/n...y-25-elections-dg-ispr-tells-senate-committee

Op has not changed the heading but Op chose to post this version of the story.

No need to pedal BS as I have already posted the screenshot of the news from the source...

 

[Norwegian]

If you have an intent

There is no "intent". Army plays an indirect role in elections per ECP rules according to article. Changing of wording was my mistake but meaning is still the same

 

[Path-Finder]

@Norwegian,

How low can you get to support a political face? How low can people get and down to which depths to save a person who gets abused in Kabbah and in Masjid-e-Nabvi. He and Zardari are abused by people when they try to do Haj.

Who Allah insults, you cannot glorify, but I am surprised to find how low can people get and against their own country's military forces because they have a political bias. Shameful, indeed shameful!

I was at Hajj last year and I witnessed it.

 

[graphican]

There is no "intent". Army plays an indirect role in elections per ECP rules according to article. Changing of wording was my mistake but meaning is still the same

Who are you to change the title of the news? What do you think you are trying to do here?

 

[Norwegian]

How low can you get to support a political face? How low can people get and down to which depths to save a person who gets abused in Kabbah and in Masjid-e-Nabvi. Nawaz and Zardari are abused by people when they try to do Haj and who is insulted in the house of honour is among least respected.

Who Allah insults, you cannot glorify, but I am surprised to find how low can people get and against their own country's military forces because they have a political bias. Shameful, indeed shameful!

I am not a supporter of Pmln / PPP. I posted similar news on 10 July without getting this awkward response
https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/no-d...orces-in-conduct-of-elections-dg-ispr.567149/

 

[koolio]

Some forces in the status quo think the Army is an Alien and will be helping IK to win the elections, With the Army being stationed outside and inside the polling booths, there will be very little chance of rigging which is often the case in every General elections.

 

[graphican]

I am not a supporter of Pmln / PPP. I posted similar news on 10 July without getting this awkward response
https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/no-d...orces-in-conduct-of-elections-dg-ispr.567149/

YOU CANNOT CHANGE TITLE OF THE NEWS or MALIGN PAKISTANI FORCES. We hear no $hit on this subject. If you are not supporting PMLN, correct the title and render and apology here to the PDF members for your angled comments against Pakistan Army.

 

[Norwegian]

YOU CANNOT CHANGE TITLE OF THE NEWS or MALIGN PAKISTANI FORCES. We hear no $hit on this subject. If you are not supporting PMLN, correct the title and render and apology here to the PDF members.

I already corrected it after @war&peace complaint. And also apologized for changing the wording as I thought it's same meaning. Apparently it was a huge mistake.

 

[war&peace]

There is no "intent". Army plays an indirect role in elections per ECP rules according to article. Changing of wording was my mistake but meaning is still the same

Please refrain from doing so...This is against the rules of the forum and far more important that implications of this malicious change were very gruesome on the tune of the Dawn-Leaks especially at this particular time and in this charged up atmosphere when the enemies of Pakistan are pedalling the same propaganda. If you have your opinion, just state is separately but you have no right to distort the words and change the news.

 

[graphican]

I already corrected it after @war&peace complaint. And also apologized for changing the wording as I thought it's same meaning. Apparently it was a huge mistake.

Siding with enemies of Pakistan is indeed a huge mistake. Glad to know you are not among them.

 

[Menace2Society]

Funny how PMNL and MQM and PPP were literally throwing bags of votes away in the bins and adding votes last election and nothing was said. But as soon as PTI look good set to win they cry bias. You can't blame the army from backing a party which can bring real change to the country.

Majority of politicans in Pakistan are either corrupt or purchased, this is wht your enemies keep them there and start this spin everytime they are set to lose their power.

 

[RIP Pak LAW]

Some time back, he posted this about Pakistan Army:

But our Generals were Bengali majority killers, remember?

This is a dubious profile.

 

[Norwegian]

Please refrain from doing so

Of course. Not happening again