Nike Supplier Plans Pakistan's Biggest Private Sector IPO

[Path-Finder]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1060785165700661248

 

[313ghazi]

Another bit of good news. Step by step, drop by drop, things will get better.

 

[Oneloveheretic]

Spoiler: Interloop Ltd.

Nike supplier

not NIKE

Good luck with the IPO

 

[Sully3]

Spoiler: Interloop Ltd.

Nike supplier

not NIKE

Good luck with the IPO

jealous smelly indian

slumdog millionaire

 

[Oneloveheretic]

jealous smelly indian

slumdog millionaire

[/begin sarcasm]My bad, I made the mistake of clicking on the link provided within the tweet, which then took me to an article; where it clearly stated this was a Pakistani sock company, a supplier to Nike and Adidas, seeking IPO in Pakistan. I appreciate how much you wanted the approval of our American brands. BUT Nike or any American global company would logically want to IPO and raise money in the US to raise serious cash, not Pakistan. [/end sarcasm]

 

[Menace2Society]

Really good news. Need a lot more!

 

[ALi Rizwan]

Spoiler: Interloop Ltd.

Nike supplier

not NIKE

Good luck with the IPO

Lol!

Sock Supplier for Nike Plans Pakistan's Biggest Private Sector IPO: Bloomberg Exclusive https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-11-09/sock-supplier-for-nike-plans-biggest-pakistan-private-sector-ipo …

https://t.co/gpHoXUR4jz
If it says Socks Suppliers(Exporter) there is only 1 company in Pakistan INTERLOOP no one else deal in it.

Company is strong so no issue regarding IPO.

Although Entering Denim Industry is new for them and time will tell how successful they will be,

 

[Indus Pakistan]

not NIKE

The OP never said it was 'Nike'. He stated 'Nike supplier' which is correct. The company supplies to Nike. So you got yourself in a twist.

 

[ALi Rizwan]

I appreciate how much you wanted the approval of our American brands. BUT Nike or any American global company would logically want to IPO and raise money in the US to raise serious cash, not Pakistan.

Oh Genius! These name are mentioned because Company Main Business is Export too These & Other Top Brands.

 

[Oneloveheretic]

The OP never said it was 'Nike'. He stated 'Nike supplier' which is correct. The company supplies to Nike. So you got yourself in a twist.

He changed and updated his original title which did not have the new addition 'supplier' in it. At the time I posted my first post here he had Nike Plans Pakistan's Biggest Private Sector IPO

 

[Indus Pakistan]

He changed and updated his original title which did not have the new addition 'supplier' in it. At the time I posted he had Nike Plans Pakistan's Biggest Private Sector IPO

Oh, okay !

 

[Path-Finder]

Whats the big bloody fuss

 

[Thorough Pro]

Do you have comprehension problems or did your mother dropped you on your head? or maybe you are just an ignoramus indian hiding behind US flags desperately looking for a happy moment ?

My bad, I made the mistake of clicking on the link provided within the tweet, which then took me to an article; where it clearly stated this was a Pakistani sock company, a supplier to Nike and Adidas, seeking IPO in Pakistan. I appreciate how much you wanted the approval of our American brands. BUT Nike or any American global company would logically want to IPO and raise money in the US to raise serious cash, not Pakistan.

View attachment 517357

 

[xyxmt]

My bad, I made the mistake of clicking on the link provided within the tweet, which then took me to an article; where it clearly stated this was a Pakistani sock company, a supplier to Nike and Adidas, seeking IPO in Pakistan. I appreciate how much you wanted the approval of our American brands. BUT Nike or any American global company would logically want to IPO and raise money in the US to raise serious cash, not Pakistan.

View attachment 517357

can't do much about your mental block

 

[Oneloveheretic]

can't do much about your mental block

Do you have comprehension problems or did your mother dropped you on your head? or maybe you are just an ignoramus indian hiding behind US flags desperately looking for a happy moment ?

I was being sarcastic in my reply and was being deliberate in calling out the fact that I happened to check the link and actually read the article, unlike you guys.

I've now made my intent obvious in that post for future drive-by readers