New Pakistans in making in India

[Aasimkhan]

The ruler decided to accede with India, So legally also it's a part of India. Anyways, take it if you can.


Blah blah.

Ruler was no one to decide the fate and we are taking it back dont worry. You have already lost it

You are obviously slow. I am not a believer in the god fairy.
You and your fellow believers are. Its for your actions to reflect the koran in a positive manner. Which we all can see clearly do not.
Unfortunately koran readers are in forefront of only killings, wars and dictatorships.
And this is across the board. Not a exception.

You were not talking of Quraan readers, you were talking of Quraan Mr Athiest

 

[footmarks]

Ruler was no one to decide the fate and we are taking it back dont worry. You have already lost it


You were not talking of Quraan readers, you were talking of Quraan Mr Athiest

YA, its you who will decide the fate LOL. Mark it my friend, I won't worry about kashmir much. It ain't going to you.

 

[Aasimkhan]

As @haviZsultan has said earlier that pakistan is a state of mind, it can occur anytime anywhere. So new pakistans can crop up not only in india but throughout the world. May be in europe, russia, america and africa.
I hope secular ideology pravails and people can learn to live with people of other faiths peacefully.

This maulana Barkati is very fundamental in his thinking, he rejects everything that a modern democracy stands for.
I am just waiting for the day he pledges allegiance to isis.

How dare you call your country secular ? where people are burnt alive for eating beef is it secular behaviour ? your country is headed for extremism 100 times more dangerous than Taliban or ISIS. RSS/BJB will make sure India goes back to 17th Century.

YA, its you who will decide the fate LOL. Mark it my friend, I won't worry about kashmir much. It ain't going to you.

Kashmir is ours. Kashmirs spit on your face

YA, its you who will decide the fate LOL. Mark it my friend, I won't worry about kashmir much. It ain't going to you.

You changed the subject when your lie got caught

 

[footmarks]

How dare you call your country secular ? where people are burnt alive for eating beef is it secular behaviour ? your country is headed for extremism 100 times more dangerous than Taliban or ISIS. RSS/BJB will make sure India goes back to 17th Century.


Kashmir is ours. Kashmirs spit on your face


You changed the subject when your lie got caught

In your dreams. Kashmir, the territory, remains with India. And will remain with India. Whoever want to leave, can leave. But the land is not going anywhere.

 

[Jugger]

How dare you call your country secular ? where people are burnt alive for eating beef is it secular behaviour ? your country is headed for extremism 100 times more dangerous than Taliban or ISIS. RSS/BJB will make sure India goes back to 17th Century.

Indias constitution is secular and does not favour any religion, conversely you can say that our constitution is god less.
The example you have quoted is a criminal behaviour and such people are punished by the law, I can give you many examples of such nature.
Whereas you can't say the same for pakistan, can you?
You guys are still debating on national television and on forums like this as to what pakistan stands for! Is it purely islamic nation or is it secular in nature?
And btw your constitution is a mess.
Your liberals don't like it cause it's not secular enough and your islamists don't like it cause it doesn't follow sharia law enough.

PS: have a very nice day.

 

[Aasimkhan]

Indias constitution is secular and does not favour any religion, conversely you can say that our constitution is god less.
The example you have quoted is a criminal behaviour and such people are punished by the law, I can give you many examples of such nature.
Whereas you can't say the same for pakistan, can you?
You guys are still debating on national television and on forums like this as to what pakistan stands for! Is it purely islamic nation or is it secular in nature?
And btw your constitution is a mess.
Your liberals don't like it cause it's not secular enough and your islamists don't like it cause it doesn't follow sharia law enough.

PS: have a very nice day.

In a country where innocent Muslim civilians are tied to military jeeps and paraded in the open, and Indian Army chief awards a Medal of Honour to this criminal major you call it secular ?

In a secular country the Indian Army chief and this major both would be court martialed.

In your dreams. Kashmir, the territory, remains with India. And will remain with India. Whoever want to leave, can leave. But the land is not going anywhere.

So India has become a land grabber now ? Land belongs to Kashmiris and they are going no where. Indian occupation is illegal and criminal.

This is just the start, India will have to liberate sikhs, Nagas and AP as well

 

[footmarks]

In a country where innocent Muslim civilians are tied to military jeeps and paraded in the open, and Indian Army chief awards a Medal of Honour to this criminal major you call it secular ?

In a secular country the Indian Army chief and this major both would be court martialed.


So India has become a land grabber now ? Land belongs to Kashmiris and they are going no where. Indian occupation is illegal and criminal.

This is just the start, India will have to liberate sikhs, Nagas and AP as well

No. Land belongs to India, kashmiris belong to the land. Get your understanding right. India will liberate all those who try to break India.

 

[Jackdaws]

Ruler was no one to decide the fate and we are taking it back dont worry. You have already lost it


You were not talking of Quraan readers, you were talking of Quraan Mr Athiest

Actually, you signed the Agreement which allowed the Ruler to decide the fate of his province. If you wish to revisit the Indian Independence Act of the British Parliament, which gave the rulers of Princely States that right then you might have to revisit the creation of Pakistan itself.

 

[Aasimkhan]

Actually, you signed the Agreement which allowed the Ruler to decide the fate of his province. If you wish to revisit the Indian Independence Act of the British Parliament, which gave the rulers of Princely States that right then you might have to revisit the creation of Pakistan itself.

If this principal is correct Then why India invaded Junagadh ?

No. Land belongs to India, kashmiris belong to the land. Get your understanding right. India will liberate all those who try to break India.

India is already broken now. Time is not on your side.

 

[cyborga8a]

Most pakistanis in australia do not want to go back to pakistan at all.

 

[Aasimkhan]

Most pakistanis in australia do not want to go back to pakistan at all.

ha ha may be they want to go to to Delhi the certified dirtiest city in the world.

 

[cyborga8a]

ha ha may be they want to go to to Delhi the certified dirtiest city in the world.

Atleast they would be alive in delhi but their opinion about pakistan is very much worse.

 

[Jackdaws]

If this principal is correct Then why India invaded Junagadh ?


India is already broken now. Time is not on your side.

It is a common misconception that India invaded Junagadh. The Nawab fled Junagadh after Pakistan failed to send troops to Junagadh and indeed any assistance. So the administration of Junagadh invited the Indian State to take over the administration of the full state following which a plebiscite was conducted. I don't know why Pakistan did not send its troops or help the Nawab in any way after Junagadh has acceded to the Pakistani dominion. Perhaps a Pakistani member can shed some light. But yes, legally and officially Junagadh had acceded to Pakistan. Your country had a valid case there.

 

[Aasimkhan]

It is a common misconception that India invaded Junagadh. The Nawab fled Junagadh after Pakistan failed to send troops to Junagadh and indeed any assistance. So the administration of Junagadh invited the Indian State to take over the administration of the full state following which a plebiscite was conducted. I don't know why Pakistan did not send its troops or help the Nawab in any way after Junagadh has acceded to the Pakistani dominion. Perhaps a Pakistani member can shed some light. But yes, legally and officially Junagadh had acceded to Pakistan. Your country had a valid case there.

So you admit india is the culprit in atleast one of the cases.

 

[El Sidd]

It is a common misconception that India invaded Junagadh. The Nawab fled Junagadh after Pakistan failed to send troops to Junagadh and indeed any assistance. So the administration of Junagadh invited the Indian State to take over the administration of the full state following which a plebiscite was conducted. I don't know why Pakistan did not send its troops or help the Nawab in any way after Junagadh has acceded to the Pakistani dominion. Perhaps a Pakistani member can shed some light. But yes, legally and officially Junagadh had acceded to Pakistan. Your country had a valid case there.

Muslim majority areas. We went for the spirit and not the technicality. If we went by technicality then the map of India will look significantly different than today.

Although I would prefer visiting Junagardh and Sasan Gir and interact with the Maldharis who my forefathers encountered during their travels across India.