What's new

New informations about IRGC's stealth bomber !

. . .
Ok, No crying. Sheesh typical persian attitude. Getting defensive
You seem to know a lot about Persians!! One who thinks he insulted Iranians by calling them Persians.. I would insult Americans by calling them Americans from now on!! ir I may insult French by calling them as French!!
Strange times it is...!!
 
.
You seem to know a lot about Persians!! One who thinks he insulted Iranians by calling them Persians.. I would insult Americans by calling them Americans from now on!! ir I may insult French by calling them as French!!
Strange times it is...!!
LOL. I love the way you guys just assume things and then go defensive. I am sorry I should have said the persian on PDF. Not the persians as whole

I am not in the position of crying... You have to cry about chinese TOT !
Youre the one who is losing his temper. And I have said it before no one calls CH-5 as PAkistani
 
.
LOL. I love the way you guys just assume things and then go defensive. I am sorry I should have said the persian on PDF. Not the persians as whole


Youre the one who is losing his temper. And I have said it before no one calls CH-5 as PAkistani

I am not Persian !

But a proud Iranian...

You are clearly calling Iranian products fake & expecting no response from Iranian members?
 
. . . . .
All I see is pics. just like Qahaer. No specs no engine info, No range, ceiling Etc Info.

But very useful for local public consumption
Could you please provide the same information for RQ170? There is none. What there is in Wikipedia is also all stipulations. Before Iran captured it, there was no formal information on its existence. Are you then going to infer it was for public consumption as well? Countries never announce the specs of their top weapons.

Iran revealed clip of Iranian copy flying which was even recognized by credible sources like Jane's Defense.
 
.
Could you please provide the same information for RQ170? There is none. What there is in Wikipedia is also all stipulations. Before Iran captured it, there was no formal information on its existence. Are you then going to infer it was for public consumption as well? Countries never announce the specs of their top weapons.

Iran revealed clip of Iranian copy flying which was even recognized by credible sources like Jane's Defense.
Yes, But there are other predator drones info available. So we can easily concur.
 
. .
Yes, But there are other predator drones info available. So we can easily concur.

As dear @Arminkh mentioned it before Rq-170 being captured not only its specs had not been revealed but also not a single photo of it was released ... and for God sake why should we reveal sensitive data of our military products?
 
.
This friend of ours expect Iran to release all info regarding its top grade weapons to public... No country does so.. Only countries who are after marketing their products or see it no harm if the info is released do so...

Iran among all weaponry producers is a unique case.. Iranian weapons have an element of surprise just because there is little info about them...

There is a website for MoD in Iran in English that lists weapons for export... There are detailed info about them... Each and every system has a catalog... This is because they are for sale...

There are numerous top secret military projects by different advanced nations... USA, Russia, Iran, China, India, etc.. They all have projects that the world knows little about... There are only leaked photos available for some of these weapons... For Iran, the 100 feet long stealthy bomber is of strategic nature and there won't be any info released... until Iran makes a better bomber there is little chance we know about details of the older one.. This is the rule..

btw, there is nothing wrong with being defensive... Although, avoiding your posts here is not any sort of defense.. It only means your posts are not pure, innocent questions.. This is why your receive this kind of responses... If you ask these questions to any other advanced weaponry producer nation they would respond you the same...
 
.
Back
Top Bottom