What's new

New Delhi backed Portugal over Canada on UN seat,canada criticis india

luckyyy

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Sep 23, 2010
Messages
2,337
Reaction score
-1
Fri, Oct 15 01:11 PM
Toronto, Oct 15 (IANS) India came in for sharp criticism here Thursday for not backing Canada in its bid for a seat in the UN Security Council.

New Delhi backed Portugal over Canada for one of the non-permanent seats in the Security Council this week.

India reportedly voted for Portugal because it supports its bid for a permanent seat in the Security Council whereas Canada is opposed to inclusion of more permanent members. Instead Ottawa wants more non-permanent membership on a regional basis. China and the UAE also reportedly backed Portugal.

Though there was no reaction from the government which backed India at the Nuclear Suppliers' Group to end its nuclear isolation and later inked a nuclear deal with it this June, the media slammed India for its 'betrayal' of a friendly nation.

'When the time came for Canada to count its friends in its bid for a seat at the United Nations Security Council, India wasn't there,' wrote the Globe and Mail under the headline 'India turned its back on Canada during bid for Security Council seat.'

'Those with a close knowledge of how nations voted in the General Assembly say India supported Portugal over Canada in the contest for a temporary seat on the council this week. That vote stings: Prime Minister Stephen Harper has invested a great deal of political capital in improving Indo-Canadian ties. In this instance, at least, his efforts were for naught,' the newspaper said.

The paper said there were good reasons for Canada to hope for India's support as 'the subcontinent is the second largest source of immigrants to Canada, which has a large Indian diaspora.

'Mr. Harper visited India last November, and the two nations signed a nuclear energy co-operation agreement earlier this year. The Conservatives (ruling party) have identified its fellow Commonwealth member as a key market, as Canada seeks to pivot from the Atlantic to the Pacific in search of new, emerging markets for its resources and manufactured goods. 'But India supported Portugal nonetheless.'

Indian High Commissioner Shashishekhar Gavai tried to make light of the issue, saying India's too lost a similar contest in 1996. 'One has to move on. It's not really the end of the world. Canada's position does not stand diminished in any way,' Gavai said.

Parliamentary secretary Deepak Obhrai, who is the highest-ranking Indo-Canadian in the government, told IANS, 'We understand India's position. They have their own priorities...which is fine. Every country votes according to its priorities. We congratulate Indians on winning their seat at the Council.'

India criticised for 'betraying' Canada on UN seat - Yahoo! India News
 
.
Canada is a world peace keeper and where UN army is Canada is there. Canada has done so much for UN and in return what it got. Very sad
 
.
Damn.. :cry:

I wish Canada had won too. That would have been double Toast for me.
 
. .
^ Good job India. Its time we focus on our own interests rather than being worried about not rubbing someone the wrong way. If portugal supports our bid for a permanent seat and canada does not, then so be it..

Oh Well... I guess that is how it works.

In International relations, two countries will not agree over everything but relations in one arena must become a non-issue for another arena. Cause at the end of the day countries will agree on issues where there is mutual interest and will disagree on issues where there is not.
 
.
'Mr. Harper visited India last November, and the two nations signed a nuclear energy co-operation agreement earlier this year. The Conservatives (ruling party) have identified its fellow Commonwealth member as a key market, as Canada seeks to pivot from the Atlantic to the Pacific in search of new, emerging markets for its resources and manufactured goods. 'But India supported Portugal nonetheless.'

it should better be other way round ,

if canada want indian markets for its resources and manufactured goods , then they should supported india rather asking indian support...
 
.
permanent membership is a good dream
but India is not elligable for this seat
his humanitarian record is very bad
 
.
permanent membership is a good dream
but India is not elligable for this seat
his humanitarian record is very bad

let me know when your vote of no confidence becomes eligible for creating an impact in the selection process.. Pakistan voting against India is always assumed anyway..
 
. . . . .
do not engage the trolls guy.

Anyways this is a useless thread. there's nothing much to discuss really.

request mods to close it.
 
.
india is good at back stabbing

Back stabbing ?

Look at who China voted for.

In any case its about time India thought for itself 1st always & every time.

After denying visa to Indians it was naive for the Canadians to expect India to vote for it anyway.

The present Govt in Canada is weak and weak Govts should not xpect support.
 
.
United Nations Security Council - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

India already will be non permanent member list in 2011
It is a good new already
For the 2-year term which begins on the first day of 2011, India has been elected with a record vote of 187 out of 192 countries voting. The other elected non-permanent members for this 2-year period will be South Africa, Colombia, Germany and Portugal.

There are many countries in Europe wishing strongly India be a permanent member.
Someone knows why Canada doesn't want any new member?
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom