Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Buying parts and data does not mean that they copied from some other Russian aircraft.
Yahoo! is so unreliable.
Interesting.They do look similar. Their inlets are the ones that seem to be a major difference.
I am sorry. I don't see ANY similarity besides the same canard configuration...
The J-20 uses side intake, DSI. Canards are positioned much back. The wings are of different shape. The tail fins are of different shape. The fuselage is of different shape.... Where the hell is the similarity?
In laymans lingo ,the design rejected by india and russia is adapted by china.
so that means it doesnt have radar evading tech.
The similarities are:they are both the fighter planes,they both have wheels,two wings and two engines.The different is one was a failed project and the other one will get service in 2016.I am sorry. I don't see ANY similarity besides the same canard configuration...
The J-20 uses side intake, DSI. Canards are positioned much back. The wings are of different shape. The tail fins are of different shape. The fuselage is of different shape.... Where the hell is the similarity?
those indians just want to have a nice sleep`
---------- Post added at 05:12 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:10 PM ----------
which design adapted by china?
Funny thing is that the Eurofighter has just about as many similar features to the MIG-1.44 as the J-20. Since they are not Chinese, however, they don't get accused of "reverse engineering" designs.