What's new

Netanyahu refused to be in same restaurant as Nawaz Sharif

.
Who cares about Islamic emirate of Afghanistan? .
your government did.... didn't it?

Sometimes you say we turned on them, sometimes you say we support them, are you schizophrenic by any chance?

actually, is your comprehension skills that are at doubt here, do you know what "turn" means... you should know it by know, it has be defining characteristic of your deep state.
 
Last edited:
. . .
It was a very cheap move by Netenyanhu considering that Israel and Pakistan were partners in Afghan-Soviet war and continue to co-op on anti Terror activities.

Anyways Israel and Palestine are two non trust worthy nations we dont want to have anything to do with...Jews across Arabia were involved in false flag operations to defame their own countries and gain sympathy for their international cause of statehood..such is their parasitic mentality..
 
Last edited:
.
Netanyahu refused to be in same restaurant as Pakistani leader | New York Post

Israel avoided a potentially uncomfortable New York confrontation with Pakistan during UN General Assembly week by canceling a dinner reservation for Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu after learning Pakistan’s Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif would be eating at the same spot.

The billionaire Pakistani leader ate at Serafina Always on Tuesday night.

Netanyahu’s team had booked tables there, too, “but decided not to proceed after learning the Pakistani pol would be there,” a source told us, adding the decision to cancel was made “for security reasons.”

Sharif, speaking in 2014 about the Gaza conflict, said, “[The] world must stop Israel from this naked and brutal aggression.”

Netanyahu is scheduled to address the UN General Assembly on Thursday and is expected to talk about Islamic extremism and the Iran nuclear deal.

A witness at Serafina said Sharif dined for three hours on the second floor with his wife, who “looked beautiful” dressed in gold, and 10 others in his entourage, while his security detail occupied two separate tables.

His party was adamant that there could be no alcohol nor meat, and they ate pizzas and drank sodas. For dessert they ate apple pie, cheesecake and chocolate soufflé.

But they declined the tiramisu because it contains a splash of amaretto.

When they left the place at 10:30 p.m., we’re told Sharif and his wife spoke in Italian to the staff, saying, “Grazie.” (Jo banda mun main naala daal kay shalwar band ta hai, ussay italian kahan say agaee?)

A source added of Netanyahu, “He opted not to eat at Serafina after learning Pakistan’s leader would be there. Netanyahu has the best security in the world. But one can assume that it wouldn’t make sense for him to be at a restaurant at the same time as Sharif.”

We don't give a damn about israel.
 
.
I guess everybody should be scared of an unruly Bull if left unleashed in a crowed marketplace.

I believe the same about the cow .... as well ....
 
. .
No fortunately he wasn't. If he was a king then whole hotel would book for his and his family members. :-)

The second Floor is enough for King Nawaz Sharif. He didn't booked the full hotel because critics in Pakistan will criticize him about his royal ways.:dirol:
 
. . .
But views of Pakistanis matters in their foreign policy.

Not really, Sir. Pakistanis do not control their foreign and defense polices since they are known to be controlled by the military. That is how the people can say whatever they want, even deny Israel's existence, but the military can still do business with them, such as during the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan. The military understands how international geopolitics work much better, obviously.
 
. .
Not really, Sir. Pakistanis do not control their foreign and defense polices since they are known to be controlled by the military. That is how the people can say whatever they want, even deny Israel's existence, but the military can still do business with them, such as during the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan. The military understands how international geopolitics work much better, obviously.

Military is derived from society so generally their strategic policies are representations of prevailing environment in the society.
Apart from few give and takes at tactical level there is a clear strategic difference of opinion.
 
.
Military is derived from society so generally their strategic policies are representations of prevailing environment in the society.
Apart from few give and takes at tactical level there is a clear strategic difference of opinion.

The military strategists work for the military, not the people. They understand the realities without emotionalism, Sir.
 
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom