1. Land gets fragmented - economies of scale advantage is lessened.
2. People get the my baap culture - that if they dont have something its the govt's job to give it to them.
3. free loading gets a little ingrained.
On the other hands - the positives are a lot
1. Fiefdoms of landowners is broken.
2. massive Political clout of the few is broken and lessened. This automatically means that the little guy on the street has more clout.
3. Creates a class that aspires to move ahead in life
4. Breaks perpetual serfdom in these little fiefdoms of the landlords.
And if managed properly - like a land ceiling of decent size then economies of scale can still be
Overall, Land reforms are a good thing since the British tried to make sure that a few landlords held most of the lands. The only thing is that it should not degenerate into populism.
Nehru`s reforms were a partial success only , so were the Mao agri reforms of 1950 .. but still they achieved enough ..
A "Green Revolution" may not be the result , but such reforms would be quite beneficial
They achieved enough to break the stranglehold of huge landlords in many areas in India(not all).
That gave the common man some breathing space and made sure govts are not held hostage to these big landlords.