What's new

Nearly a Quarter of China Could Be Forest by 2020

A more thorough research should be done in regards to forestry and forest cover. The beautiful old primeval forests are nearly gone and a lot of the new forest cover consists of low grade eucalypt, pine and poplar. What's really needed to be done is to grow indigenous trees native to each region and expand on the original primeval forests.

To make things worse, some opportunist and enterprising local officials are growing fruit and nut trees to make money with! If the trees are not native to the region it could cause unneccary strain on local water sources as well as ruin the ecological balance.

In Cixin Lius three body problem, the part with the military cutting down old growth forests broke my heart. To think that fresh water streams teaming with wild fish running through ancient forests being cut down and now being "rectified" by planting fast growing eucalypt is a nasty parody of the true beauty of old growth.

Totally agree with you.

Deep ecology is the study and application that will create new forests. It is not just planting trees, is it.

The entire ecosystem needs to be designed and then buit.

Yes, the word is built. It might sound unnatural...but sadly we will have to build forests from henceforth.

Planting trees in a row does not create forests but greens...The resforestation experiements on smaller scale have been very successful in China...

But when looked at western regions a dedicated science needs devleopment and application.

Through gene tech, botanic sciences, soil science, aqua and meterological sciences and with software application... and we must not forget the fungi...the fungi are the key.

yes, in due time real forest can emerge with native flora and fona.

By creating smaller pockets of micro ecosystems first and then guiding them to connect to become a single ecosystem is the key. But first we need a model and then well simulated plan to execute...

100 years+ and you shall have the beginning of a living and sustainable native ecosystem.

@Kiss_of_the_Dragon your idea of channelling monsoon is not outrageous at all; might need some modifications but will help to build the ecosystem in the western regions. Mositure in the air is what is needed. Not only river diversification.

All the best in these great efforts.
 
The environmental upgrade from low grade vagetation to high grade indigenous real forests via nature's selection takes time

Lots of time or a lot less time depending on whether the central government makes it a priority.

The central government can literally level mountains at a whim, they just need the will and money and I think that in time, they will come around.
 
Totally agree with you.

Deep ecology is the study and application that will create new forests. It is not just planting trees, is it.

The entire ecosystem needs to be designed and then buit.

Yes, the word is built. It might sound unnatural...but sadly we will have to build forests from henceforth.

Planting trees in a row does not create forests but greens...The resforestation experiements on smaller scale have been very successful in China...

But when looked at western regions a dedicated science needs devleopment and application.

Through gene tech, botanic sciences, soil science, aqua and meterological sciences and with software application... and we must not forget the fungi...the fungi are the key.

yes, in due time real forest can emerge with native flora and fona.

By creating smaller pockets of micro ecosystems first and then guiding them to connect to become a single ecosystem is the key. But first we need a model and then well simulated plan to execute...

100 years+ and you shall have the beginning of a living and sustainable native ecosystem.

@Kiss_of_the_Dragon your idea of channelling monsoon is not outrageous at all; might need some modifications but will help to build the ecosystem in the western regions. Mositure in the air is what is needed. Not only river diversification.

All the best in these great efforts.

Some even have crazy idea as bring sea water to Xinjiang, the only problem it the salt, it might contaminate the soil. We need an efficient water management plan to make a green China

 
Some even have crazy idea as bring sea water to Xinjiang, the only problem it the salt, it might contaminate the soil. We need an efficient water management plan to make a green China


Yes, water is the key to all this. But most importantly the management of this life source as you correctly identified.

But let us see what the forestery ministery does in the coming years..
 
Some even have crazy idea as bring sea water to Xinjiang, the only problem it the salt, it might contaminate the soil. We need an efficient water management plan to make a green China


Thats crazy. The precipitation from the salt water can add water to the atmosphere in the area but the salt will fcuk things up forever. Instead of going for fast and crazy fixes a slow but comprehensive approach is better. Just as the desert can encroach, the forest can also slowly encroach and reclaim the damaged lands.

My proposal (just one idea):

Healthy prisoners with severe crimes can atone by joining a green army(mobile prison camp) and plant trees to stop the desert encroaching. Its a harsh as hell existence but one day off per year will make life bearable. Even shitty drought resistant shrubs,grass and trees will do, anything is better than desert.
 
A UN report details the reforestation plan as part of China's "eco-civilization" program.




Rolfmueller, via Wikimedia


Forests could cover 23 percent of China's landmass by the year 2020 if the country is successful in the development of its "ecological civilization" program, according to a recent report by the United Nations Environment Program (UNEP).

The report, "Green is Gold: The Strategy and Actions of China's Ecological Civilization," notes that, since opening up its economy 30 years ago, the country has undergone economic growth at an average rate of 9.8 percent per year, successfully transitioning from a low-income to a high-middle-income nation in that time. That has brought considerable economic benefits, but it has come at a cost to the environment and human health, particularly in the form of chronic air pollution in many of its cities -- and the fact that China is now the planet's No. 1 emitter of greenhouse gases.

In 2007, Xi Jinping, now China's president, began advocating for the concept of an "ecological civilization." Five years later, it was elevated to a national strategy. Zhu Guangyao, executive vice president of the Chinese Ecological Civilization Research and Promotion Association,explains rather breathlessly that ecological civilization "is a new concept in the development of human civilization. It refers to material, spiritual and organizational achievements in following objective laws of harmonious human, social and natural development."

RELATED: Could China Stop Illegal Wildlife Trafficking?

All of which sounds fine in principle, although it has been noted that, "Chinese leaders are keener on coming up with slogans than implementing them." In the words of one observer: "I can't pretend to know how serious China's leaders are with respect to their stated goal of achieving an "ecological civilization," and one certainly can't help but notice the irony when looking at the pollution belching out of smoke stacks as you travel to and from the airport," but, that same observer notes, "authoritarian leadership, like it or not, has pointed to a spot on a distant horizon and set change in motion."

By the end of 2014, the UNEP report notes, China had built 10.5 billion square meters of energy-saving buildings in urban areas -- roughly 38 per cent of the total area of urban residential buildings. In addition, China's production of new-energy vehicles increased 45-fold between 2011 and 2015. The country has also built the largest air-quality monitoring network in the developing world, and lowered energy consumption per unit of GDP and the amount of CO2 released per unit of GDP.

The program plans to build on such achievements by, in addition to increasing forest cover, increasing prairie vegetation coverage by 56 percent, reclaiming more than half of reclaimable desert and preserving at least 35 percent of the natural shorelines. Other targets include cutting water consumption by 23 percent, energy consumption by 15 percent and carbon emissions per unit of GDP by 18 percent, and reaching peak CO2 emissions by 2030.

"If China succeeds in achieving these targets," said UNEP Executive Director Achim Steiner, "then it will have taken a major step towards shifting to a greener economy that uses resources more efficiently, limits the risks of climate change and improves the health of its people."
http://www.seeker.com/forests-to-cover-nearly-25-of-china-by-2020-1843957373.html

I don't believe this news, it's overenthusiastic and downplaying China's future water problems.

Google: https://www.google.de/?client=firefox-b#q=China's+water+problem

Actually, China's deserts are growing at a great pace: http://globalriskinsights.com/2016/02/chinas-growing-deserts-a-major-political-risk/

China’s growing deserts a major political risk
Desertification-in-China-01-e1456354455765-800x500_c.jpg

0 0 63 2
by Jeremy Luedi , February 26, 2016

As desertification in China increases and government efforts to stop the sand’s advance falter, serious political risks are emerging from hub to hinterland.

When most people think of China’s landscape, they envision rivers and rice paddies, yet much of China does not conform to this image. From Tibet and Xinjiang, to the Russian border, the majority of Chinese territory is comprised of desert, grasslands, or arid steppe.

These regions only fell under official Chinese rule during the Qing dynasty, and for most of China’s 5,000 years as a civilization, dynasties and kingdoms have centered around the south-eastern river valleys and coasts.



China’s outer regions are resource rich, yet they help comprise the 2.6 million km², or one third of China, that is classified as desert or wasteland. Desertification in China is a major problem for Beijing, as the country’s deserts are growing, threatening environmental, economic, and political stability.

The Green Wall of China
Following the creation of the People’s Republic of China (PRC) in 1949, the country embarked on history’s largest nation building exercise. To this end, vast swathes of China’s forests were felled for fuel, lumber, and paper production for the billions of little red books and proclamations emanating from Beijing. This process was accelerated in the 1960s, as forest and grassland cover shrank, increasing the rate of desertification.

As the deserts grew, the government recognized the threat and began a gargantuan reforestation effort in 1978, planting 66 billion trees to date. This project – colloquially dubbed the ‘Green Wall of China’ – is a multigenerational mega project slated to be completed by 2050.



The end target is the creation of 405 million hectares of new forest – covering 42% of China’s territory – and increasing global forest cover by 10%. The goal of this new tree line is to prevent erosion and desertification by creating a barrier of stable soil across the north of the country.

While the intentions of this audacious project were noble, the lack of a proper environmental assessment, and an over-emphasis of planting quotas has actually exacerbated, not mitigated, the problem.

How planting trees created a desert
The government introduced fast-growing, but non-native species such as pine and poplar, while simultaneously rooting out local keystone species like sea buckthorn during the 1980s. The removal of sea buckthorn, removed a species playing a vital role in holding the soil together, thus increasing erosion.

The introduced pine and poplar are also very thirsty species, and introducing billions of them into an already arid environment, sunk the water table up to ten times below its original depth. This in turn killed off the shorter roots of prairie grasses, causing further desertification.

This set of events created a feedback loop in which greater sand storms and a lack of water suffocated many of the non-native trees planted by the Chinese. Furthermore, since these trees were derived from cuttings, their life expectancy (of around 40 years) was greatly reduced. Consequently, huge swathes of trees planted in previous decades are dying of old age, all at the same time.

Add to this the dangers of monoculture planting – a billion poplar trees died from blight in 2000 – and the result is that only 15% of the trees planted since 1949 are still alive (and only 33% of those planted from 1970 onwards).

Beijing reaps a bitter harvest
The unintended consequences of China’s tree planting initiative have seen a significant increase in the size of the country’s deserts. Alongside the Gobi, China is now home to the Taklimaka desert, the world’s second largest wandering desert. Consequently, the spread of deserts has seen more than half the land in provinces such as Gansu rendered inhospitable.

The growing deserts have also added a new dimension to China’s pollution problem, as giant sandstorms descend on the country from March to May, affecting cities such as Beijing, itself only a few hundred kilometers from the encroaching desert. Sandstorms not only add a new subcategory for hazardous air quality, but also pick up contaminants in the polluted soil of China’s industrial north, raining toxic dust on major cities.


Dust storms from the north stretch over China – Image Credit: Wikimedia Commons

This only further reduces the already low number of clear sky days in Beijing, fueling protests and unrest over the region’s pollution. Pollution, alongside corruption (which often fosters the former) is the largest single cause of domestic protests in China. Beijing faces a serious threat, from pollution triggered unrest as its economy slows and consumer spending is no longer sufficient to placate the population. Government claims about decreasing pollution fall flat in the face of a nation shrouding particulate storms.

Alongside the cumulative, long-term health effects of sandstorms, they are also serious natural disasters. In 1999, 85 people died in China’s deadliest sandstorm, and a massive storm in 2010 affected some 270 million people across 16 provinces.

Desertification threatens China’s economic ambitions
Encroaching deserts threaten 400 million people in China already struggling with unproductive marginal agricultural land and water shortages. In Gansu province, the Hongyashan reservoir – Asia’s largest – is undergoing a 50% capacity increase to 148 million m³ in order to alleviate water shortages caused by desertification.

Sand storms have also severely undermined the reservoir’s efficiency, as decades of storms have deposited 33 million m³ of silt into the reservoir, filling a third of the dam’s capacity.

Further east, China’s regional economic aspirations are threatened by greater desertification. Specifically, the Chinese government’s Silk Road infrastructure projects connecting Central Asia are at risk of being swallowed by the desert. For instance, China has had to build forested windbreaks and shelters from 2003 to 2006, to protect a 522 km highway in Xinjiang.

Geography fuels ethnic tensions in China
To add to the central government’s worries, the areas most threatened by desertification in China are almost coterminous with the regions inhabited by the country’s (often restive) ethnic minorities. In both Tibet and Xinjiang, local environmental concerns are leading to ethnic unrest as traditional livelihoods are threatened by both the encroaching desert and Han monopolization of viable land.

Increasingly forced to rely on marginal land, Tibetans and Uyghurs have yet another reason to agitate against Beijing. This only fuels the government’s paranoia regarding ethno-regional unrest, leading to more repressive security apparatuses.



The problem for Beijing is that while both Tibet and Xinjiang already have ample causes for anger, desertification is leading to unrest in another region, Inner Mongolia. Since 2003, 480,000 people in Inner Mongolia have been relocated in the name of fighting desertification. Ethnic Mongolians are protesting these actions, as well as government bans on grazing and herding to protect vulnerable, sand-fixing grasslands.

Ethnic Mongolians are claiming these practices unfairly target them and their livelihoods, as livestock grazing has not created this environmental disaster. Moreover, while ethnic Mongolians are chafing under the grazing ban, ecologically destructive practices such as strip mining go unchecked.

The last thing Beijing needs is for ethnic Mongolians to join Tibetans and Uyghurs as a third major resistive element in the country’s hinterlands. China already fears and suffers from violence from cross-border Uyghur separatists. It cannot afford an ethnic Mongolian insurgency based in neighbouring Mongolia.

The Great Wall did not keep the Mongols out the first time; at this rate the Green Wall won’t either.
 
I don't believe this news, it's overenthusiastic and downplaying China's future water problems.

Google: https://www.google.de/?client=firefox-b#q=China's+water+problem

Actually, China's deserts are growing at a great pace: http://globalriskinsights.com/2016/02/chinas-growing-deserts-a-major-political-risk/

China’s growing deserts a major political risk
Desertification-in-China-01-e1456354455765-800x500_c.jpg

0 0 63 2
by Jeremy Luedi , February 26, 2016

As desertification in China increases and government efforts to stop the sand’s advance falter, serious political risks are emerging from hub to hinterland.

When most people think of China’s landscape, they envision rivers and rice paddies, yet much of China does not conform to this image. From Tibet and Xinjiang, to the Russian border, the majority of Chinese territory is comprised of desert, grasslands, or arid steppe.

These regions only fell under official Chinese rule during the Qing dynasty, and for most of China’s 5,000 years as a civilization, dynasties and kingdoms have centered around the south-eastern river valleys and coasts.



China’s outer regions are resource rich, yet they help comprise the 2.6 million km², or one third of China, that is classified as desert or wasteland. Desertification in China is a major problem for Beijing, as the country’s deserts are growing, threatening environmental, economic, and political stability.

The Green Wall of China
Following the creation of the People’s Republic of China (PRC) in 1949, the country embarked on history’s largest nation building exercise. To this end, vast swathes of China’s forests were felled for fuel, lumber, and paper production for the billions of little red books and proclamations emanating from Beijing. This process was accelerated in the 1960s, as forest and grassland cover shrank, increasing the rate of desertification.

As the deserts grew, the government recognized the threat and began a gargantuan reforestation effort in 1978, planting 66 billion trees to date. This project – colloquially dubbed the ‘Green Wall of China’ – is a multigenerational mega project slated to be completed by 2050.



The end target is the creation of 405 million hectares of new forest – covering 42% of China’s territory – and increasing global forest cover by 10%. The goal of this new tree line is to prevent erosion and desertification by creating a barrier of stable soil across the north of the country.

While the intentions of this audacious project were noble, the lack of a proper environmental assessment, and an over-emphasis of planting quotas has actually exacerbated, not mitigated, the problem.

How planting trees created a desert
The government introduced fast-growing, but non-native species such as pine and poplar, while simultaneously rooting out local keystone species like sea buckthorn during the 1980s. The removal of sea buckthorn, removed a species playing a vital role in holding the soil together, thus increasing erosion.

The introduced pine and poplar are also very thirsty species, and introducing billions of them into an already arid environment, sunk the water table up to ten times below its original depth. This in turn killed off the shorter roots of prairie grasses, causing further desertification.

This set of events created a feedback loop in which greater sand storms and a lack of water suffocated many of the non-native trees planted by the Chinese. Furthermore, since these trees were derived from cuttings, their life expectancy (of around 40 years) was greatly reduced. Consequently, huge swathes of trees planted in previous decades are dying of old age, all at the same time.

Add to this the dangers of monoculture planting – a billion poplar trees died from blight in 2000 – and the result is that only 15% of the trees planted since 1949 are still alive (and only 33% of those planted from 1970 onwards).

Beijing reaps a bitter harvest
The unintended consequences of China’s tree planting initiative have seen a significant increase in the size of the country’s deserts. Alongside the Gobi, China is now home to the Taklimaka desert, the world’s second largest wandering desert. Consequently, the spread of deserts has seen more than half the land in provinces such as Gansu rendered inhospitable.

The growing deserts have also added a new dimension to China’s pollution problem, as giant sandstorms descend on the country from March to May, affecting cities such as Beijing, itself only a few hundred kilometers from the encroaching desert. Sandstorms not only add a new subcategory for hazardous air quality, but also pick up contaminants in the polluted soil of China’s industrial north, raining toxic dust on major cities.


Dust storms from the north stretch over China – Image Credit: Wikimedia Commons

This only further reduces the already low number of clear sky days in Beijing, fueling protests and unrest over the region’s pollution. Pollution, alongside corruption (which often fosters the former) is the largest single cause of domestic protests in China. Beijing faces a serious threat, from pollution triggered unrest as its economy slows and consumer spending is no longer sufficient to placate the population. Government claims about decreasing pollution fall flat in the face of a nation shrouding particulate storms.

Alongside the cumulative, long-term health effects of sandstorms, they are also serious natural disasters. In 1999, 85 people died in China’s deadliest sandstorm, and a massive storm in 2010 affected some 270 million people across 16 provinces.

Desertification threatens China’s economic ambitions
Encroaching deserts threaten 400 million people in China already struggling with unproductive marginal agricultural land and water shortages. In Gansu province, the Hongyashan reservoir – Asia’s largest – is undergoing a 50% capacity increase to 148 million m³ in order to alleviate water shortages caused by desertification.

Sand storms have also severely undermined the reservoir’s efficiency, as decades of storms have deposited 33 million m³ of silt into the reservoir, filling a third of the dam’s capacity.

Further east, China’s regional economic aspirations are threatened by greater desertification. Specifically, the Chinese government’s Silk Road infrastructure projects connecting Central Asia are at risk of being swallowed by the desert. For instance, China has had to build forested windbreaks and shelters from 2003 to 2006, to protect a 522 km highway in Xinjiang.

Geography fuels ethnic tensions in China
To add to the central government’s worries, the areas most threatened by desertification in China are almost coterminous with the regions inhabited by the country’s (often restive) ethnic minorities. In both Tibet and Xinjiang, local environmental concerns are leading to ethnic unrest as traditional livelihoods are threatened by both the encroaching desert and Han monopolization of viable land.

Increasingly forced to rely on marginal land, Tibetans and Uyghurs have yet another reason to agitate against Beijing. This only fuels the government’s paranoia regarding ethno-regional unrest, leading to more repressive security apparatuses.



The problem for Beijing is that while both Tibet and Xinjiang already have ample causes for anger, desertification is leading to unrest in another region, Inner Mongolia. Since 2003, 480,000 people in Inner Mongolia have been relocated in the name of fighting desertification. Ethnic Mongolians are protesting these actions, as well as government bans on grazing and herding to protect vulnerable, sand-fixing grasslands.

Ethnic Mongolians are claiming these practices unfairly target them and their livelihoods, as livestock grazing has not created this environmental disaster. Moreover, while ethnic Mongolians are chafing under the grazing ban, ecologically destructive practices such as strip mining go unchecked.

The last thing Beijing needs is for ethnic Mongolians to join Tibetans and Uyghurs as a third major resistive element in the country’s hinterlands. China already fears and suffers from violence from cross-border Uyghur separatists. It cannot afford an ethnic Mongolian insurgency based in neighbouring Mongolia.

The Great Wall did not keep the Mongols out the first time; at this rate the Green Wall won’t either.




vast swathes of China’s forests were felled for fuel, lumber, and paper production for the billions of little red books and proclamations emanating from Beijing
OMG!! Our forests are all screwed for making billions of little red books!!:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:,if this article is not written by retard with alterior motives,then what else can it be???
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I don't believe this news, it's overenthusiastic and downplaying China's future water problems.

Well Chinese officials will have to address this water problem or the government will be in serious trouble, this is about life and death, propaganda won't help.
 
Improvements in ecosystem services from investments in natural capital

Science 17 Jun 2016: Vol. 352, Issue 6292, pp. 1455-1459
DOI: 10.1126/science.aaf2295

China's national ecosystem assessment
China recently completed its first National Ecosystem Assessment covering the period 2000–2010. Ouyang et al. present the main findings of the assessment. Investment in the restoration and preservation of natural capital has resulted in improvements at the national level in most of the major ecosystem services measured. In particular, food production, carbon sequestration, and soil retention showed strong gains; on the other hand, habitat provision for biodiversity showed a gradual decline. Regional differences remain nonetheless, and there are serious environmental challenges still to be met in areas such as air quality and the wider global footprint of raw material imports.​

Science, this issue p. 1455

Abstract
In response to ecosystem degradation from rapid economic development, China began investing heavily in protecting and restoring natural capital starting in 2000. We report on China’s first national ecosystem assessment (2000–2010), designed to quantify and help manage change in ecosystem services, including food production, carbon sequestration, soil retention, sandstorm prevention, water retention, flood mitigation, and provision of habitat for biodiversity. Overall, ecosystem services improved from 2000 to 2010, apart from habitat provision. China’s national conservation policies contributed significantly to the increases in those ecosystem services.
Link -> http://science.sciencemag.org/content/352/6292/1455

Related news release:

China’s Environmental Conservation Efforts are Making a Positive Impact
June 16, 2016
By Bjorn Carey

A series of ambitious environmental policies that invest in natural capital are improving services provided by China's ecosystems, such as flood control and sand storm mitigation, according to research by an international team of scientists.


China gets a bad rap on its environmental stewardship, in large part due to the environmental damage and atmospheric pollution that result from the country’s rapid economic and infrastructure growth. But a new decade-long report, involving the work of 3,000 scientists, reveals that China’s environmental policies are making clear positive impacts.

“China has gone further than any other country, as strange as that sounds given all the devastation that we read about on the environment front there,” said Woods Senior Fellow Gretchen Daily (Biology), the senior author on the study. “In the face of deepening environmental crisis, China has become very ambitious and innovative in its new conservation science and policies and has implemented them on a breathtaking scale.”

The efforts are guided in part by software developed by the research team, which identifies which environmental areas should be protected or restored to provide the greatest benefit. Through this work, China has eagerly incorporated science and funded some of the most far-reaching efforts in the world, which could serve as a model for other countries, according to the study’s authors.

Daily and an international team of researchers report the results of the China ecosystem assessment, which was launched by the Chinese Academy of Sciences and China’s Ministry of Environmental Protection, in the June 17 issue of Science.

Officials in China began considering significant environmental reform following a series of natural disasters in the late 1990s that were exacerbated by human activities. In particular, in 1998, massive deforestation and erosion contributed to devastating flooding along the Yangtze River. Thousands of people were killed, and more than 13 million people were left homeless following $36 billion in property damage.

That this occurred just a year after a historic drought signaled to officials in the country that steps needed to be taken to protect and restore China’s natural capital. By 2000, China developed the Natural Forest Conservation Program and the Sloping Land Conversion Program, $50 billion projects aimed at reducing natural disaster risks by restoring forest and grassland, while also improving life conditions for 120 million poverty-stricken farmers.
Continue -> China’s Environmental Conservation Efforts are Making a Positive Impact | Stanford Woods Institute

#####​

China’s big investment to fix environmental wrongs shows both people and nature can win

June 16, 2016

China’s massive investment to mitigate the ecosystem bust that has come in the wake of the nation’s economic boom is paying off. An international group of scientists finds both humans and nature can thrive – with careful attention.

The group, including scientists who have done research at Michigan State University (MSU), report on China’s first systematic national accounting of how the nation’s food production, carbon sequestration, soil and water retention, sandstorm prevention, flood mitigation, and biodiversity are doing, and what trends have emerged. The work, which spans from 2000-2010, appears in this week’s edition of Science Magazine.

“To achieve global environmental sustainability and enhance human well-being, effective government policies can play crucial roles,” said co-author Jianguo “Jack” Liu, Rachel Carson Chair in Sustainability and director of MSU’s Center for Systems Integration and Sustainability (CSIS).

The paper notes that China’s effort to lift hundreds of millions of people out of poverty since the 1970s came at a high cost of environmental degradation, including deforestation and erosion that resulted in devastating flooding. The National Forest Conservation Program (NFCP) and the Sloping Land Conversion Program, which started around 2000, paid farmers and households in critical areas to restore forest and grassland – delivering alleviation of poverty in addition to environmental benefits.

In roughly the first decade, the programs cost $50 billion dollars.​

Continue -> China’s sustainabiity fix shows both people and nature can win | Center for Systems Integration and Sustainability | Michigan State University
 
Last edited:
Tuesday, August 23, 2016, 09:57
China to establish national eco-experimental zones
By Xinhua

BEIJING – China will establish several national ecological experimental zones to explore reforms ranging from natural resource balance sheets to ecological performance evaluation of officials, according to an official guideline published on Monday.

The guideline, released by the general offices of the Communist Party of China (CPC) Central Committee and the State Council, aimed at carrying out reforms on "ecological civilization system."

According to targets set in the guideline, major progress shall be achieved by 2017 and full-fledged ecological civilization systems shall be established by 2020, with best practices replicable across the country.

Main experiments will include establishing a natural resource property right system, compiling natural resource balance sheet, optimizing land and space planning, and incorporating ecological performance into officials' evaluation.

Fujian, Jiangxi and Guizhou provinces, which have "relatively optimal ecological foundation, and relatively strong environmental and resource capacity," were selected as the first batch of experimental zones.

An implementation plan for Fujian province was released together with the guideline on Monday.

According to the implementation plan, Fujian will strive to become a leader in national land and space planning by explicitly reserving land and space for ecological protection, and never overstepping the "red line."

Fujian will also strive to establish a property rights system of natural resource assets as well as systems that reflect market values of ecological products, thereby introducing economic incentives into ecological protection.

The province will also try to improve officials' performance evaluation to reflect their "ecological performance" such as resource depletion or environmental degradation on their watch.

Specific measures will include compiling natural resource balance sheets, and natural resource asset auditing at times when the official in charge concludes his or her term.

Targets were set in the plan, including that water quality of over 90 percent of water systems in the province will reach optimal level, 23 cities will enjoy good air quality in over 90 percent of days, and forest coverage will pass 66 percent by 2020.
 
OMG!! Our forests are all screwed for making billions of little red books!!:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:,if this article is not written by retard with alterior motives,then what else can it be???
That statement alone destroy the credential of the whole article. :rofl::rofl:
 

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom