@PARIKRAMA A shopkeeper told me how businesses are running in Assam. A group of people buys land patta at Rs 1 lakh somewhere deep inside a village. While seeking a mortgage loan of amount say Rs 80 lakhs they mortgage this land citing its value at Rs 5 lakhs, much higher than the original value of Rs 1 lakhs. The bank people are convinced and therefore the loan of Rs 80 lakhs is granted for 5 years. So when the borrower party defaults without repaying a single fraction of amount of Rs 80 lakh the bank seize the land. But look at the margin here ! Rs 80 lakh borrowed, not a single penny of it returned so he loses his Rs 1 lakh of land patta. So it doesn't matter if he loses 1 lakh of land because he didn't have to repay the Rs 80 lakh he got as loan.
Who in the world has credit underwriting people like that... Its not like that my friend
In an underwriting scenario for any mortgage backed loan or a collateral based loan, there are two major heads and 2 ratios which are important. Assuming its a loan for retail pupose not industrial where industrial cashflows also support repayments of loan dues.
The major first heads is classification of the collateral into agricultural or non agricultural. Non agricultural is further sub classed into residential, commercial and industrial property.
Agricultural land cannot be mortgaged, their papers at best can be kept as collateral in a vault but no legal right can be vested by a bank. This is the reason that such agricultural land loan backed loan will be at best given at 50% LTV (Loan to Value) or a limit of say Rs 10 lacs (varying from bank to bank)
Judging from the fact that if the property given is in village and quantum being Rs 80 lacs, its a public sector bank which can try this proposal but not private sector banks as their credit committee wont ever agree for residential, commercial and industrial property purely based out of village. In fact it can be mix of rural and semi-urban property if its a pvt sector bank.
Second thing is the underwriting basis which has lots of financial ratios. But collateral wise there are 2 ratios.
1. Loan Exposure to Collateral Value coverage.
If your loan is Rs 80 Lacs
If you say your collateral which is land is Rs 5 lacs, and is proved via a valuation report and a legal report stating no issues in title deeds and the property is clear for bank to mortgage, then considering the whole land with no margin of loss implies the collateral value at Rs 5 lacs.
Most banks dont do that, they normally consider not market value but rather conservatively a distressed sale value which is approximately 75% of Market value.
Thus you get 3 terms here
Book Value : Rs 1 lacs
Market Value: Rs 5 lacs
Distressed Sales Value: Rs 3.75 Lacs
So your Loan Exposure to Book Value Coverage : 80/1 = 80
This gives you the most conservative coverage.
The bigger organisations have properties which are bought for Rs 1 lacs or even less in books but today market value is in crores like SBI themselves having huge land bank properties.
This gives the second ratio
Loan Exposure to Market Value Coverage = 80/5 = 16
Loan Value to Distressed Value Coverage = 80/ 3.75 = 21.33
In all these cases the collateral coverage at best scenario of market value is 6.25% of the loan taken.
Thus this loan case will be outriught rejected by credit committee of the bank for mortgage loan as loan to collateral coverage is pathetically low.
2. The second part is additional security which can be
The Personal Guarantee: If the networth of the applicant is huge then the PG is taken to boost the loan exposure to security coverage ratio.
Example : Let PG of the applicant is say Rs 35 lacs declared as per networth sttatement , filed in ITRs and signed certified by a CA firm. Assume he has no other liabilities, then
Loan Amount: 80 lacs
Security land MV = 5 lacs
PG - 35Lacs
Security = 40 lacs
Loan to Security = 80/40 = 2
The PG basically is just a comfort factor not a recourse which in true terms means anything to a bank. They can attest the person as Wilful Defaulter as he stood as a guarantor for the loan by providing his personal networth as a compfort point for the bank to sanction loan against a meagre security of land he offered for the property He may also give a undated cheque for loan value as he is a guarantor which when sent for clearance and when bounced means he can be taken for a legal recourse.
Other options are FD, Gold, investments, shares etc ete where margins are deducted as per individual credit risk policies of the bank and as per RBI rule.
Most likely in this the second point is not applicable or else a police case would have been registered and the applicant picture would be published in Newspaper and declared WFD. this will lead to sealing of applicants all other bank accounts linked via PAN Card number,
This brings back to the original equation. Loan to Collateral value stands at 16. Which credit committee of the bank will approve it. IF Branch Manager gave this loan in his own discretionary power, then he is part of the fraud and will be fired + court case would be initiated by the bank for recovery.
In all such cases where you get land and a loan is asked normally you will get 50-80% of the value of the collateral.Anything over 100% would mean a product template deviation and will need higher authority to approve. In this case being 16 times many other comfort factors are needed which i dont believe in really would have been given as its case of fraud.
Thus, i believe the whole story is a hoax... You can fool a bank surely.. but when it comes to land as collateral, the legal and valuation report tends to be a strong point of providing comfort which leads to approval at different levels of credit committee or board risk committee for high leverage cases....
Its a bit far fetched story my friend....