Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Lahori Paa Jee, where are you....?
I think the issue is going to revolve around whether or not the constitutional right of any Pakistani to reside in Pakistan can be trumped by a voluntary exile. If the court rules that it does not, then we might see the secondary argument that his exile was a condition for the remittance of his prison sentence, in which case the court would have to rule whether the "exile" would be constitutional in that sense. We might see the court rule that it still isn't constitutional and NS has to therefore serve out his prison term if he returns, or that the exile is unconstitutional and NS does not have to serve his term because of the sentence remittance. It would be interesting to see how the court justifies the latter; if the remittance of the sentence can be shown to be a direct result of, and conditional to, the agreement to go into exile.
Here's the joke of the day: Daily Times - Leading News Resource of Pakistan
Sharifs can return home: SC verdict
Updated at 1635 PST
ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court of Pakistan in a landmark verdict on constitutional petitions of Mian Nawaz Sharif and his brother Shahbaz Sharif, Thursday announced that Sharif brothers are Pakistanis and can return home and participate in the national politics.
The apex court in a brief judgment said that under Article 3 of the constitution no citizen of the country can be stopped from his or her return to home.
Senior lawyer Fakhruddin G. Ibrahim appeared before the court in the case on behalf of Sharif brothers. Attorney General Malik Qayyum, Ahmed Raza Kasuri and Ibrahim Satti were the counsels of the federation.
There is a uniformed president sitting in the Presidency. The President is wearing a uniform...