What's new

NATO versus SCO, which alliance is more powerful?

Which is more powerful?


  • Total voters
    71
.
Wait for next 30 years ..we may have a match in sco for nato force
 
.
And u think my posts are useless
Russia has nothing left except nukes.
Poor growth projection with low population and having beef with the west will **** it up in next 2 decades.
It simply has no other possibility.
On chinese,u can't keep on growing at 7 % forever................
I didn't saw this before so quoting now.

Russia haven't lost everything. Russia has everything he want to conquer the whole world for example nukes, weapons and scientists etc. On the other hand, US is more f*cked up than Russia. When Russia was trying to stabilize its country, US and NATO were busy fighting jihadis in Afghanistan and Middle East. It seems like US's hunger of war didn't end after dissolution of USSR.

Second thing is that because of poor performance of US, China started growing even more faster than before. That is why China has become a huge economic power. You are right that you cannot grow on 7% forever. One example is US too. Europe is not doing great either. Now who will provide gas to Europe after Russia? US?

No one stays as super power forever. Mighty US will soon fall too. SCO is future not NATO.

The US claims all of Canada and vice versa. Such disputes have practically no practicality in the real world.
Their is a difference between US Canada land dispute and Pakistan China India land dispute. In US Canada case, US is so called super power and unlike US, Canada don't possess nukes. In Pakistan China India land dispute case, all three have nukes and will retaliate hard enough for their land instead of preferring talks if war happens and then there are nukes.

Land dispute between Pakistan China and India are significant than any other land dispute in world. It should be solved as soon as possible for better growth of Asia.
 
.
NATO's Article 5: The Conditions for a Military and a Political Coalition | Fall 2001

"On September 12, the day after the terrorist attack on the United States, NATO Secretary-General Lord George Robertson announced that, "If it is determined that this attack was directed from abroad against the United States, it shall be regarded as an action covered by Article 5 of the Washington Treaty," otherwise known as the North Atlantic Treaty.

This was the first time that Article 5 - the core element of the treaty and the basis for "collective defense" - had ever been invoked, after 40 years of Cold War and a decade of subsequent peace in which the allies had never needed to call upon this most fundamental strategic and political commitment."
I wonder if they would have invoked the article 5 - if they new the Zionists were behind the attack -, to attack the real perpetrators , and not innocent people for the sake of the same perpetrators. NATO was an accomplice in this. And other military alliances should emerge to counter its hegemony and falsehood. The SCO is not one but...can become one, in a different form and shape. Then most probably much more powerful than NATO
 
.
The US claims all of Canada and vice versa. Such disputes have practically no practicality in the real world.

source please

as to comparison , US alone is enough to deal with those countries
 
.
As long as Canada is in NATO, SCO will never be able to match: not now, not 1000 years from now.
 
.
NATO now SCO probably by 2040 or so .SCO needs to include more powerful countries as permanent members ,hope India Pakistan will get membership soon
 
.
Not a chance even at future. At future do you really think that we'd just keep there and sit? SCO or any other alliance will ever match NATO. The key factor in a military alliance is the interoperability of personnel and equipment. Even those will need at least decades for SCO to match. Command structure? Well the current ACO and ACT is way far ahead than the most of the militaries in the World including those in and will be in SCO combined in the fields of C4ISR, chain of command. And at least 60 years of experience where you can say "United we stand" one day. But again 60 years later NATO would own any other alliance, keeping ourselves up to date every day.
 
. .
Really? Is this why Turkey needs to buy Chinese HQ-9 air defense missiles? :omghaha:

It was a political move genius. We are in talks with France now, FD-2000 deal is about to be suspended likely.

France builds an AC/LHD to Russia whom is supposed to be a superpower :rofl: whereas we build ours with ToT but at least at our home :rofl:

"Spearhead" force seems like pissed not only the Russians but also those pretend to be Russians off.
 
.
It was a political move genius. We are in talks with France now, FD-2000 deal is about to be suspended likely.

France builds an AC/LHD to Russia whom is supposed to be a superpower :rofl: whereas we build ours with ToT but at least at our home :rofl:

"Spearhead" force seems like pissed not only the Russians but also those pretend to be Russians off.


That's right man. Turkey is a NATO country. Should buy from another NATO country :yes4: Else China might one day sanction Turkey :o:

What's Spearhead force? :coffee:
 
.
Dumb question!! SCO is not a military organization atleast as of today so how can it be compared to Nato, beats all the logic..
 
.
Dumb question!! SCO is not a military organization atleast as of today so how can it be compared to Nato, beats all the logic..


SCO countries are allies. Attack 1 of them and you got all of them on your plate :yes2:
 
.
SCO countries are allies. Attack 1 of them and you got all of them on your plate :yes2:
Not gonna happen, unless you are dreaming!! Nobody will millitarily attack SCO allies or NATO allies anyways, unless they want to start another world war!!
 
.
Not gonna happen, unless you are dreaming!! Nobody will millitarily attack SCO allies or NATO allies anyways, unless they want to start another world war!!


Good point :enjoy:

Are India, Iran, Pakistan, Mongolia getting SCO memberships today or tomorrow? :coffee:
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom