NATO says China presents ‘systemic’ challenges

[CAPRICORN-88]

Except it isn't looking at the East, it's only concern is Europe. It's called North Atlantic Alliance

Some Khmer Krom believe Vietnam is geographical located beside USA and China is in Europe.

 

[bshifter]

Some Khmer Krom believe Vietnam is geographical located beside USA and China is in Europe.

Don't you know? He believes his skin is white like Europeans thus Vietnam is of great concern to Europe.

 

[CAPRICORN-88]

Someone has just forwarded this to me.

Yes. I agree as I can see similarly in here, many trolls in here are trying very hard go defame China without any success.

The good news is many folks are awakening and will not falls for these incoherent and illogical accusations and lies conjured out of thin air.

 

[bshifter]

Someone has just forwarded this to me.

Yes. I agree as I can see similarly in here, many trolls in here are trying very hard go defame China without any success.

The good news is many folks are awakening and will not falls for these incoherent and illogical accusations and lies conjured out of thin air.

The idiots just enjoy doing this for fun i suppose and this forum allows this sort of digital pollution.

 

[Viet]

Except it isn't looking at the East, it's only concern is Europe. It's called North Atlantic Alliance

Nato now focusing on China. If not looking East then what?
If China under Xi Jingping just shuts up then the world will be more quiet in the East.
Chinese are like a naked elephant that runs amok.

 

[bshifter]

Nato now focusing on China. If not looking East then what?
If China under Xi Jingping just shuts up then the world will be more quiet in the East.
Chinese are like a naked elephant that runs amok.

NATO might be examining your anus that's as far as east as they go.

 

[huckyang]

NATO might be examining your anus that's as far as east as they go.

NATO = No Action Talk Only.

 

[Globenim]

So Chinas rule based development and right to selfdefense is making lawless colonial terror regimes like the USA and Britain furious so they send their dusted axis or evil club spokesperson after China to make themself sound a little less alone

*yawn*

 

[Yongpeng Sun-Tastaufen]

NATO soldiers too scared to fight China. Cowards. Not their great gramps or gramps generations who fought WW1, WW2.

 

[Kyusuibu Honbu]

Not even counting NATO & Regional partners like India. China is boned.

You can even add NATO's nemesis Russia to that list

Russians have plans of using preemptive nuclear strike on China if PLA threaten Siberia.

A PREVIEW OF RUSSIA'S NEW MILITARY DOCTRINE


5. (C) Zolotarev argued that, while the chances of a large-scale war breaking out are remote, China would most likely be the target of any preemptive nuclear strike. Most serious military planners dismissed any threat from NATO long ago, he posited. China still has a mass mobilization army, he said, and the Russian Far East is thinly populated, has little infrastructure, and a small Russian military contingent. With the Russian army restructured to rapidly respond to small-scale wars, the GOR would have to rely on its nuclear deterrent to prevent a Chinese attack. He admitted, however, that by declaring the right to launch a nuclear first strike, Russia appeared to be taking a step back from the spirit, if not the letter of its Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty Article VI commitments regarding nuclear disarmament.

https://wikileaks.org/plusd/cables/09MOSCOW3138_a.html

 

[Yongpeng Sun-Tastaufen]

You can even add NATO's nemesis Russia to that list

Russians have plans of using preemptive nuclear strike on China if PLA threaten Siberia.

A PREVIEW OF RUSSIA'S NEW MILITARY DOCTRINE


5. (C) Zolotarev argued that, while the chances of a large-scale war breaking out are remote, China would most likely be the target of any preemptive nuclear strike. Most serious military planners dismissed any threat from NATO long ago, he posited. China still has a mass mobilization army, he said, and the Russian Far East is thinly populated, has little infrastructure, and a small Russian military contingent. With the Russian army restructured to rapidly respond to small-scale wars, the GOR would have to rely on its nuclear deterrent to prevent a Chinese attack. He admitted, however, that by declaring the right to launch a nuclear first strike, Russia appeared to be taking a step back from the spirit, if not the letter of its Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty Article VI commitments regarding nuclear disarmament.

https://wikileaks.org/plusd/cables/09MOSCOW3138_a.html

True. After Taiwan, Vladivostok is next. Don't forget. Vladivostok used to be a Chinese village during Qing dynasty.

 

[Zsari]

Beijing’s ‘assertive behaviour’ is challenging the ‘rules-based international order’, transatlantic security alliance says.

NATO heads of the states and governments pose for a family photo during the NATO summit at the Alliance's headquarters, in Brussels, Belgium [Kevin Lamarque/Pool/Reuters]
14 Jun 2021

Updated:
14 Jun 2021
05:44 PM (GMT)
NATO has moved to confront China’s military ambitions for the first time, issuing a communique that said Beijing presents “systemic challenges” for the transatlantic security alliance.
The communique followed a summit of NATO leaders in Brussels on Monday and marked a diplomatic victory for US President Joe Biden, who had urged the 30-member strong alliance to stand up to China’s burgeoning military, political and economic might.

The language will now set the path for alliance policy and comes a day after the Group of Seven wealthy nations issued a statement on alleged human rights abuses in China and Taiwan that Beijing said slandered its reputation.
“China’s stated ambitions and assertive behaviour present systemic challenges to the rules-based international order and to areas relevant to alliance security,” NATO’s 79-point communique said.
It accused Beijing of “rapidly expanding its nuclear arsenal” and being “opaque in implementing its military modernisation”, as well as highlighting China’s military cooperation with Russia in exercises in the Euro-Atlantic region as a concern.

Turkey’s President Tayyip Erdogan, Britain’s Prime Minister Boris Johnson, France’s President Emmanuel Macron and U.S. President Joe Biden attend a plenary session at a NATO summit in Brussels, Belgium, June 14, 2021 [Brendan Smialowski/Pool/REUTERS]“We call on China to uphold its international commitments and to act responsibly in the international system, including in the space, cyber, and maritime domains, in keeping with its role as a major power,” the communique said.


Addressing reporters following the summit, NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg said there was a “strong convergence of views among allies” regarding the challenges posed by Beijing’s behaviour.
“Leaders agreed that we need to address such challenges as an alliance and that we need to engage with China to defend our security interests,” he said.
Biden said the alliance’s mutual defence pact was a “sacred obligation” for the US – a marked shift in tone from his predecessor Donald Trump, who had threatened to withdraw from the alliance and accused Europeans of contributing too little to their own defence.
“I want all Europe to know that the United States is there,” said Biden. “NATO is critically important to us.”
Balancing threat
Germany’s Chancellor Angela Merkel, at her last summit of the alliance before she steps down in September, described Biden’s arrival as the opening of a new chapter. She also said it was important to deal with China as a potential threat, while keeping it in perspective.

“If you look at the cyber threats and the hybrid threats, if you look at the cooperation between Russia and China, you cannot simply ignore China,” Merkel told reporters. “But one must not overrate it, either – we need to find the right balance.”

Biden said both Russia and China were not acting “in a way that is consistent with what we had hoped”.
Al Jazeera’s Senior Political Analyst Marwan Bishara said the comments made by Stoltenberg and others in Brussels should not be taken “lightly”.
“There is a new Cold War being manufactured. And this new Cold War would have a huge, huge ramifications for international security,” Bishara told Al Jazeera from Paris, France.
“What we have been seeing the last few days and today … is the US insisting on maintaining American primacy around the world, and rejecting any of sort bipolarity with China.”
In other developments, NATO’s communique said the alliance would adapt to climate-related security challenges, called on Russia to drop its designation of two allies – the United States and the Czech Republic – as “unfriendly countries” and urged Iran to stop all ballistic missile activities.
The alliance also said it was committed to providing transitional funding for the Hamid Karzai airport in Kabul, Afghanistan, after the US-led withdrawal of allied troops from the country.

NATO says China presents ‘systemic’ challenges - YouTube

NATO says China presents ‘systemic’ challenges | NATO News | Al Jazeera

Yes systematic challenge as the Chinese system has proven to be too effective that it is posing a challenge to the liberal one system fits all narrative.

 

[Reashot Xigwin]

Yes systematic challenge as the Chinese system has proven to be too effective that it is posing a challenge to the liberal one system fits all narrative.

The plague you unleashed to your country mismanagement says otherwise

 

[Paul2]

Beijing’s ‘assertive behaviour’ is challenging the ‘rules-based international order’, transatlantic security alliance says.

NATO heads of the states and governments pose for a family photo during the NATO summit at the Alliance's headquarters, in Brussels, Belgium [Kevin Lamarque/Pool/Reuters]
14 Jun 2021

Updated:
14 Jun 2021
05:44 PM (GMT)
NATO has moved to confront China’s military ambitions for the first time, issuing a communique that said Beijing presents “systemic challenges” for the transatlantic security alliance.
The communique followed a summit of NATO leaders in Brussels on Monday and marked a diplomatic victory for US President Joe Biden, who had urged the 30-member strong alliance to stand up to China’s burgeoning military, political and economic might.

The language will now set the path for alliance policy and comes a day after the Group of Seven wealthy nations issued a statement on alleged human rights abuses in China and Taiwan that Beijing said slandered its reputation.
“China’s stated ambitions and assertive behaviour present systemic challenges to the rules-based international order and to areas relevant to alliance security,” NATO’s 79-point communique said.
It accused Beijing of “rapidly expanding its nuclear arsenal” and being “opaque in implementing its military modernisation”, as well as highlighting China’s military cooperation with Russia in exercises in the Euro-Atlantic region as a concern.

Turkey’s President Tayyip Erdogan, Britain’s Prime Minister Boris Johnson, France’s President Emmanuel Macron and U.S. President Joe Biden attend a plenary session at a NATO summit in Brussels, Belgium, June 14, 2021 [Brendan Smialowski/Pool/REUTERS]“We call on China to uphold its international commitments and to act responsibly in the international system, including in the space, cyber, and maritime domains, in keeping with its role as a major power,” the communique said.


Addressing reporters following the summit, NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg said there was a “strong convergence of views among allies” regarding the challenges posed by Beijing’s behaviour.
“Leaders agreed that we need to address such challenges as an alliance and that we need to engage with China to defend our security interests,” he said.
Biden said the alliance’s mutual defence pact was a “sacred obligation” for the US – a marked shift in tone from his predecessor Donald Trump, who had threatened to withdraw from the alliance and accused Europeans of contributing too little to their own defence.
“I want all Europe to know that the United States is there,” said Biden. “NATO is critically important to us.”
Balancing threat
Germany’s Chancellor Angela Merkel, at her last summit of the alliance before she steps down in September, described Biden’s arrival as the opening of a new chapter. She also said it was important to deal with China as a potential threat, while keeping it in perspective.

“If you look at the cyber threats and the hybrid threats, if you look at the cooperation between Russia and China, you cannot simply ignore China,” Merkel told reporters. “But one must not overrate it, either – we need to find the right balance.”

Biden said both Russia and China were not acting “in a way that is consistent with what we had hoped”.
Al Jazeera’s Senior Political Analyst Marwan Bishara said the comments made by Stoltenberg and others in Brussels should not be taken “lightly”.
“There is a new Cold War being manufactured. And this new Cold War would have a huge, huge ramifications for international security,” Bishara told Al Jazeera from Paris, France.
“What we have been seeing the last few days and today … is the US insisting on maintaining American primacy around the world, and rejecting any of sort bipolarity with China.”
In other developments, NATO’s communique said the alliance would adapt to climate-related security challenges, called on Russia to drop its designation of two allies – the United States and the Czech Republic – as “unfriendly countries” and urged Iran to stop all ballistic missile activities.
The alliance also said it was committed to providing transitional funding for the Hamid Karzai airport in Kabul, Afghanistan, after the US-led withdrawal of allied troops from the country.

NATO says China presents ‘systemic’ challenges - YouTube

NATO says China presents ‘systemic’ challenges | NATO News | Al Jazeera

Well, now we will know for sure that they are "systemically challenged," we would've never knew it without them

That's what you need a global summit, and thousands of intel analysts for.

 

[Zsari]

The plague you unleashed to your country mismanagement says otherwise

That's the different between those who have access to top intelligence from those that are fed misinformation continuously.