NATO launches biggest military revamp since end of Cold War to counter Russia

[Devil Soul]

WARSAW: NATO leaders united on Saturday behind a “hard-headed” policy of deterrence and dialogue with Russia after launching the alliance’s biggest military revamp since the Cold War to counter a resurgent Moscow.

Alliance chief Jens Stoltenberg said alliance leaders “stand together” on Russia, agreeing at a summit in Warsaw to bolster its eastern flank after Moscow’s annexation of Crimea and the Ukraine conflict.

Russian President Vladimir Putin has opposed NATO’s decision to put four battalions in Poland and the Baltic states, seeing the expansion into Moscow’s Soviet-era backyard as a direct security threat. “The alliance is united, we stand together,” Stoltenberg said when asked about the leaders’ talks on Russia. “The united message is that defence and dialogue are what our relationship is based on.”

Around 200 anti-war activists defied heavy security in central Warsaw to protest against the summit, carrying banners saying “Yes to Peace, No to NATO”, journalists saw. Unity was the buzzword of the two-day summit in the Polish capital after Britain’s shock vote to quit the European Union raised questions about its future role as a nuclear armed global power.

Prime Minister David Cameron reassured his peers that Britain was committed to the alliance and announced a parliamentary vote next month on revamping Britain’s Trident nuclear deterrent to back that up. “The nuclear deterrent remains essential in my view not just to Britain’s security but as our allies acknowledge here today to the overall security of the NATO alliance,” Cameron told a news conference.

Cameron said Britain fully backed the measures adopted by NATO in response to the Ukraine crisis “but we must also engage in a hard headed dialogue with Russia”. NATO’s two-track strategy reflects underlying divisions in the bloc, with calls from France and Germany to avoid a Cold-War style standoff when Moscow’s help is needed on issues such as terrorism. The United States and European Union have both imposed sanctions on Moscow over the Ukraine crisis but in Europe in particular there are growing calls for them to be scaled back.
http://dailytimes.com.pk/world/10-J...evamp-since-end-of-cold-war-to-counter-russia

 

[flamer84]

This is just rhetoric,NATO is divided like never before.The South Eastern flank was abandoned and Romania was betrayed by its Western European allies.The much talked about NATO Division in Romania will only consist of Romanian troops,1 Bulgarian battalion (which is clearly not dependable and they will only be here for show) and 1 token Polish company.No French,Italian,Dutch,Spanish,German,Turkish presence as to not upset their tsar.Only the US will deploy 1k troops in here.

At least we know where we stand from now on....

 

[Vergennes]

This is just rhetoric,NATO is divided like never before.The South Eastern flank was abandoned and Romania was betrayed by its Western European allies.The much talked about NATO Division in Romania will only consist of Romanian troops,1 Bulgarian battalion (which is clearly not dependable and they will only be here for show) and 1 token Polish company.No French,Italian,Dutch,Spanish,German,Turkish presence as to not upset their tsar.Only the US will deploy 1k troops in here.

At least we know where we stand from now on....

Seems like everyone is prioritizing Poland and the baltic states instead of the southern front.
-
It's not that we don't like you,but we totally lost interest and have little enthusiasm for this part of the world,our presence (in the baltic states) will only be symbolic (A company of 150-200 soldiers and only 6 months a year.) only to somewhat fulfil our commitments toward our allies,but if it was up to us,we wouldn't even send a single soldier. (Because of other priorities...)
-
Even the poles were hoping NATO to deploy at least 3 brigades consisting of at least 5.000 personnels each...... they only got 4 battalions totalling 3000-4000 personnels.

 

[Flynn Swagmire]

@Vergennes , Its off topic.

Sir I'm curious about your signature. Is it for Brexit?

 

[Hamza913]

Good.