What's new

NATO allies commit around $1 billion per year to support Afghan forces

Devil Soul

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Jun 28, 2010
Messages
22,931
Reaction score
45
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
NATO allies commit around $1 billion per year to support Afghan forces
By Reuters
Published: July 9, 2016
2SHARES
SHARE TWEET
NATO allies stump up around $1 billion a year over the next three years to help fund the Afghan military PHOTO: REUTERS

WARSAW: NATO allies have promised the United States they will stump up around $1 billion a year over the next three years to help fund the Afghan military, NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg said on Saturday.

Germany slams NATO ‘warmongering’ on Russia

“We now have in place the $1 billion of non-US commitments,” Stoltenberg told a news conference on the second day of a NATO summit. He hinted there were still some pledges to come in, adding, “We are very close (to the target)”.

Russia says bolstering forces to counter NATO

“We are ready to stay … that’s the reason we are ready to stay beyond 2016,” Stoltenberg said on NATO’s mission to train the Afghan armed forces, which will continue into 2017 with 12,000 NATO and US troops
 
. .
NATO allies have promised the United States they will stump up around $1 billion a year over the next three years to help fund the Afghan military, NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg said on Saturday.

Ah so that was the prize money for all the garbage he threw on the floor of NATO summit against Pakistan? Bdw inn sahiban ki qeemat har guzartay waqt k saath girti hi chali ja rahi hai.
 
.
But can they beat Afghan Taliban i doubt

When a big country like India is unable to root out sponsored Proxies in three decades.:what:

How can you expect a small country like Afghanistan to beat proxies like AfghanTaliban ? :o:
 
.
When a big country like India is unable to root out sponsored Proxies in three decades.:what:

How can you expect a small country like Afghanistan to beat proxies like AfghanTaliban ? :o:

@A-Team ......writing on the wall!
 
.
NATO allies commit around $1 billion per year to support Afghan forces
By Reuters
Published: July 9, 2016
2SHARES
SHARE TWEET
NATO allies stump up around $1 billion a year over the next three years to help fund the Afghan military PHOTO: REUTERS

WARSAW: NATO allies have promised the United States they will stump up around $1 billion a year over the next three years to help fund the Afghan military, NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg said on Saturday.

Germany slams NATO ‘warmongering’ on Russia

“We now have in place the $1 billion of non-US commitments,” Stoltenberg told a news conference on the second day of a NATO summit. He hinted there were still some pledges to come in, adding, “We are very close (to the target)”.

Russia says bolstering forces to counter NATO

“We are ready to stay … that’s the reason we are ready to stay beyond 2016,” Stoltenberg said on NATO’s mission to train the Afghan armed forces, which will continue into 2017 with 12,000 NATO and US troops

Per year it will be 5 billion until the end of 2020. Shows the extremely strong confidence in the Afghan gov by US and NATO allies.
 
. .
It's not confidence it's called renting your soldiers on 3 years deal

Calling whatever you want mate, but there is a strong international commitment and I am sure this is giving some food for thought for the architects of the Talis in GHQ :)

@A-Team ......writing on the wall!

On the contrary I see this as strong commitment and belief by NATO/US and others in the ability of the NUG to keep standing at the end of all this.
 
.
When a big country like India is unable to root out sponsored Proxies in three decades.:what:

How can you expect a small country like Afghanistan to beat proxies like AfghanTaliban ? :o:

They had the whole US and NATO military behind them.

And India was well and truly rid of proxies from Pakistan ever since Musharraf took over. If there is any doubt, go and read the news papers before and after Musharraf took power. That move gave India a breather and that is where India started to back stab Pakistan rather then to continue on the goodwill and started supporting BLA and TTP to the brink.

Calling whatever you want mate, but there is a strong international commitment and I am sure this is giving some food for thought for the architects of the Talis in GHQ :)



On the contrary I see this as strong commitment and belief by NATO/US and others in the ability of the NUG to keep standing at the end of all this.

NATO and US forces have been in Afghanistan since like 2003. Today, they are unable to provide control of Afghanistan to Afghan dummy government. In 3 years or so the Americans will leave and then there will be no other option for Afghanistan but to stop its support to anti-Pakistan elements and to negotiate with Talibaan for lasting peace.
 
.
Anyways I don't agree with you that currently Afghanistan is anti-pakistan, it is not that , it is against the current policies of the GHQ. Some a distinction has to be made.
Current policies of Afghanistan that should change
they should help with walling of border
should accept the Durand line
Should stop expecting us to do more and take back refugees
Find the terrorists amongst the refugees
we have nearly 10 percent of the Afghan population in Pakistan, mostly in two cities which makes finding people amongst them difficult.
Use the defence budget to actually train soldiers who fight, not throw away weapons and flee.

Can you blame the Afghans when you host their mortal enemies and support with the everything logistics, money etc ?
The drugs grown in Afghanistan help them with money, weapons are mainly sold by Afghan troops and stock piles which they have in Afghanistan. The drug lords have to move their drugs and they use the Taliban which causes harm to us also. We should be more annoyed now that Afghanistan is promoting a drug culture in Pakistan.

Maybe then Afghans host TTP but that is just returning the favor, remember TTP crossed over to AF just a couple years ago but Pakistan has been supporting AF talis against an elected gov post 9/11.
oh yes, we remember the favors that Afghanistan has given us and we shall return them in kind. No Afghani shall stay in Pakistan in an year, and the public health services shall close their doors to the Afghani population. No free rides for Afghani's anymore.
 
.
The US has been leaving for a decade now :)

Anyways I don't agree with you that currently Afghanistan is anti-pakistan, it is not that , it is against the current policies of the GHQ. Some a distinction has to be made.

Can you blame the Afghans when you host their mortal enemies and support with the everything logistics, money etc ?
Maybe then Afghans host TTP but that is just returning the favor, remember TTP crossed over to AF just a couple years ago but Pakistan has been supporting AF talis against an elected gov post 9/11.

Again you forget history -- it is Afghanistan that interfered in Pakistan first -- by nature Military men are a suspicious breed the world over.
 
.
The US has been leaving for a decade now :)

Anyways I don't agree with you that currently Afghanistan is anti-pakistan, it is not that , it is against the current policies of the GHQ. Some a distinction has to be made.

Can you blame the Afghans when you host their mortal enemies and support with the everything logistics, money etc ?
Maybe then Afghans host TTP but that is just returning the favor, remember TTP crossed over to AF just a couple years ago but Pakistan has been supporting AF talis against an elected gov post 9/11.

I don't know how much support Talibaan are getting from Pakistan and GHQ. However, how many Afghans participated in the so called elections of Afghanistan? How many Afghans consider the government to be legitimate? Isn't the government, ever since the first tenure of Karzai, installed by US? And how do you know that you, and some others like you, speak on behalf of all Afghans?

And leave everything aside. Just answer a very simple question, do you want Pakistan to fight the Talibaan or to bring them to negotiate with your Government? You cannot have it both ways. As far as I know, we have been trying our level best to bring a peaceful solution and every time we are close to some sort of arrangement, the US steps in to either take out the leader of Talibaan or Afghanistan leaks news of the death of Omer or some other shit and the whole process goes down the drain. Why can't you see what your own Government is doing and what the invaders are doing.
 
.
Calling whatever you want mate, but there is a strong international commitment and I am sure this is giving some food for thought for the architects of the Talis in GHQ :)



On the contrary I see this as strong commitment and belief by NATO/US and others in the ability of the NUG to keep standing at the end of all this.


The GHQ is not concern of Taliban they are concern that even after General Raheel statement for peace with you guys still your president gives this anti Pakistan speech. And i don't know how shamless you guys are have some shame stabbing us and also begging us to keep the refugees in Pakistan

You guys should be called beggars with dagger
 
. . .

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom