Quite the contrary - Pakistan's strategy is to deny the Indian the possibility of victory -- and it has been able to do this generally successfully, in other words, PAF is able to deny IAF the assurance of victory, such that whereas IAF may have a greater budget and a larger force and a greater number of aircraft, but it cannot give Indian policy makers the assurance of victory should the Indian initiate hostilities.
So PAF does not need to match aircraft for aircraft, it must just continue to deny the IAF assurance of victory, even as the PAF builds capacity within the PAF for both defense production and developing unique capabilities.
Hi muse..I do think PAF is utilizing its very limited budget intelligently.Taking a limited resource(quantity and quality) in a tightly defensive field with active AWCAS and SAM support PAF can give a big headache to any AF.Because attacking AF foremost has to think about its attrition into enemy air field and inducting a capable cost effective JF17 in big number is a nice idea.
Actually as the thread starter mentioned, I feel PAF and IAF gap if its today say 1:N, will be reduced much by 2015.But if u see from 2015 IAF will pick up so fast and u can say simultaneously will be inducting 3 types high end fighters(new MKI, LCA MK2, MMRCA) all with EASA and near 5th gen avionics and that also more than 5:1 in number of PAF high end fighters.I feel by 2020 with PAK-FA the gap will be same or more as it is now.
Last edited: