Brahmaputra Mail
FULL MEMBER

- Joined
- Dec 25, 2015
- Messages
- 686
- Reaction score
- 3
- Country
- Location
India has no intention to be in a military alliance with anyone. Ekla cholo re.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
thats what they (ISIS) want to get china involved. this gives isis the ability to try recruit chinese muslims. and it would be quiet easy. as terrorists only do such acts as they are poor and un employed. and the western part of china is also one of the poorest. once isis get some foot hold there it woul create chaos. remember neighbouring muslims countries are over run by them uzbekistan is a good example. china is doing it quietly so that isis wont be able to recruiting/influencing there.
well the sco is made upof mostly ex soviet states in central asia and most of them have no business with the west or the usa. most of their business comes from russia and china. although the cpec corridor will open the world to them. and this is good, as one of the key to create a peacefull world is to make people prosper. once people are prosperous why fall for following mutated views of some thing that claims to be religious.
The SCO in its current format has more than one major power (Russia and China) that pursue foreign and military policies independent of each other. For a successful military alliance along the lines of NATO, the alliance needs to have only one major military and economic powerhouse that has an unchallenged leadership role and can be counted upon to influence the military policies of most, if not all, smaller alliance States. In addition, there needs to be a specific and clearly defined threat or 'enemy' that alliance members have consensus over, like communism/USSR was for NATO.SCO has a high probability of becoming a formal military alliance within 10 years. China, Russia, and Iran together can more forcefully resist Uncle Sam.
The SCO in its current format has more than one major power (Russia and China) that pursue foreign and military policies independent of each other. For a successful military alliance along the lines of NATO, the alliance needs to have only one major military and economic powerhouse that has an unchallenged leadership role and can be counted upon to influence the military policies of most, if not all, smaller alliance States. In addition, there needs to be a specific and clearly defined threat or 'enemy' that alliance members have consensus over, like communism/USSR was for NATO.
Even Iran is an outlier here, not because it rivals China or Russia's economic or military standing, but because it's foreign and military policies are independent of any other country and there appears to be limited Russian and Chinese influence on them.
A strong military alliance would require a level of faith on the part of member States that other member States will act responsibly and not drag the others into unnecessary military conflicts, like Russia in Georgia and Ukraine.
I can see a Russia led alliance (minus China and India) or a China led alliance (minus Russia and India), but these would have limited member States and a very clearly defined Charter with strong Chinese or Russian leadership.
For Pakistani readers, Pakistani participation in either hypothetical military alliance would be suspect, unless Pakistan can convince China or Russia that Pakistan will not instigate military conflict with India.
the OP has some serious mental problems. in one other thread, he wants China to annex India for the Han race. and the indian population? he wants to put them in concentration camps. "Mein Kampf" is probably his favorite book.Martian is living in la la land. jhungary made an excellent post explaining everything. Martian talks about annexing Mongolia annexing this and that. If it was all about military power then there would be a handful of countries left. Do you believe Russia wouldn't object to China annexing Mongolia? Do you believe Russia is happy of a rising China? If you do, you are deluded.
Russia and Iran both have huge oil reserves.
If the relations between the United States and China turn rancorous, China would be tempted to exchange a security guarantee for assured oil supplies.
Right now, China is sitting on the fence. It thinks a military alliance is bad for business.
However, if the US keeps annoying China in the South China Sea then China has a lot less to lose.
If relations between the US and China are already antagonistic, why not go all the way? Hence, I predict a militarized SCO if US-China relations go downhill over the next five to ten years.
Martian is living in la la land. jhungary made an excellent post explaining everything. Martian talks about annexing Mongolia annexing this and that. If it was all about military power then there would be a handful of countries left. Do you believe Russia wouldn't object to China annexing Mongolia? Do you believe Russia is happy of a rising China? If you do, you are deluded.
The current full members are:
China
Kazakhstan
Kyrgyzstan
Russia
Tajikistan
Uzbekistan
That's China and ex-Soviet states. Why do you need 10 years?
in 10 years Putin is a goner. quick: how many can name any other leader or any institution of Russia other than old kgb?
(hint: CHAOS doesn't count)
why not? China annexes mongolia; then Russia annexes Afghanistan; next China takes Pakistan; Russia rolls a 7 and takes over Japan; China then lands on Japan and has to pay triple rent. Russia takes that money and builds a hotel in Afghanistan. hey, anything is possible
India can easily join this group but Pakistan will have problems in joining it will be difficult to choose between US or SCO . If we join SCO our relations with the US will be damaged , that means no F-16s , no spare parts and upgrades for the F-16s we have , Military aid will be banned and relations with NATO countries will also be damaged . We should remain neutral ..
why will China take over Pakistan , China will more likely take over India *
And you guys think India will be spared ?? U guys would be the first to be Knocked out by either China or Russia cause u blab alot .because Pakistan would rather be taken over by China than Russia, that's why
And you guys think India will be spared ?? U guys would be the first to be Knocked out by either China or Russia cause u blab alot .
Here we go again
Whole purpose of Russia forcing China to give up Mongolia was, creating a buffer state between Russia and China
Despite the bon homie between Russia and China, Russians have altered their Military doctrine recently to include usage of tactical nukes against Chinese for any possible incursions into Siberia.
With China attempting to annex Mongolia, maybe the Russians will make Xinjiang and Manchuria new buffer states between Russia and China
China will not only lose Xinjiang and Manchuria but also Russia the only counter-weight to Japan in East Asia.