Ali.009
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2008
- Messages
- 965
- Reaction score
- -6
Flying while Brown: Reality lesson for “My Name is Khan” star Shahrukh
Shahrukh–the “King of Bollywood” was making a film about racial profiling in America. He was detained and questioned for hours in Newark Airport. They US immigration just wouldn’t let him go. This is one of the most recent cases of harassment of “brown” people in America. Books like “Civil rights in Peril” describe the thousands of fake high profile cases that ended up in indictment and deportation for minor infractions.
“I was really hassled — perhaps because of my name being Khan,” he said in a text message to reporters in India. “These guys just wouldn’t let me through.”
Shahrukh’s latest film reflected the Bharati experience in Australia and the UK also. Many Bharati see it as “not my problem”. However in Australia the racism took a direct hit at people from India. In the UK, the Bharatis, Indians, Pakistanis, Malaysians, Bangladeshis, Lankans, Afghans were all under one category. The same epitaph was used for all Asians. Internet Bharatis who don’t have a clue use the same epitaph for other South Asian–dispalying their stupidity and ignorance.
Khan’s upcoming film ”My Name is Khan,” a movie about an Indian Muslim setting out on a journey across the United States, is certain to get a boost after the incident.
It is not the first time that an Indian entertainer with a Muslim identity has been asked to step aside for additional scrutiny. Actors Aamir Khan and Irrfan Khan have had similar experience. So has the Canadian-Indian writer Rohinton Mistry, a Parsi, who once cancelled a book tour of the US soon after 9/11 because he felt he was being needlessly profiled. Other Indian visitors, not necessarily Muslims, have felt singled out. Times of India
Even Defence Minister George Fernandes’ ”patted down” or ‘’strip searched”. The incident has international repercussions because it paints the US as a country which is paranoid about foreigners and has taken racism to the highest level of intolerance.
The Times of India did not treat it as an insult to India. The commentaries in other Bharati newspapers were mild. We wonder if Amitab Bachan or Abhishek Bhachah had been detained, would the media reaction be so mild?
Reveerand Noemeller living in Nazi Germany once said.
“First they came for the Communists, and I didn’t speak up, because I wasn’t a Communist. Then they came for the Jews, and I didn’t speak up, because I wasn’t a Jew. Then they came for the Catholics, and I didn’t speak up, because I was a Protestant. Then they came for me, and by that time there was no one left to speak up for me.” New York Times
The hubris of Meghnad Desai displays a lack of morality. His arrogance and unsympathetic attitude towards Sharukh Khan should be condemned at all levels.
But not everyone appeared upset.
Meghnad Desai , an Indian-born economist, a member of Britain’s House of Lords and the author of books on Indian cinema and globalization, joked in an interview in New Delhi that the whole thing seemed like a publicity stunt for the new film.
“The U.S. government was an inadvertent accomplice to 20th Century Fox, which is investing millions in this movie,” he said, chuckling, referring to a joint venture between Hollywood and Bollywood to distribute the film. “This was a no-no for India-U.S. relations. Anyhow, there will be no bigger story in India tomorrow. Or maybe for the next few days.” By Emily Wax Washington Post Foreign Service, Saturday, August 15, 2009; 1:54 PM.’King of Bollywood’ Detained at Newark Airport. New York Times
Meghnad Desai’s comments is part of the problem. An article about racial profiling and racism in Switzerland solicited the usual Bharati response. This concerns Muslims not anyone else. The commentator was too stupid to know that the Swiss laws were designed against all foreigners, not just Muslims ones. Indian computer coolies working in Zurich would be just as affected by the Swiss laws as Turkish day laborers.
Shahrukh Khan is not an Indian actor. His art belongs to the world. The entire planet should speak up against his detention.