Muslim couple faces social boycott for protecting Hindu temple

[jamahir]

Please, if we adopt Islamic practices, we would be stoning people to death on the streets, chopping hands off people for theivery and killing them for apostasy should they choose to leave a religion....all under the law ofcourse.

you didn't address my previous post properly.

and as examples of islam, did i mention as examples saudia, the wrong part of iran and brunei?? no, i didn't.

did stoning happen in libyan jamahiriya, iraq, syria, socialist afghanistan etc??

stoning is a old jewish concept... why don't you blame the jewish faith then??

And if we adopt Islamic practices, women's testimony would be less than that of a man, a woman would need 4 witnesses to prove she was raped

you are giving only the superficially understood aspect... go read the deeper interpretations.

among the many other gems including the right to marry 9 year old girls... once again all under law.

it is said that hazrat ayesha was 15 or 17 when the marriage was consummated.

as comparison, the 54-year-old hindu grave digger who dug the sea-side grave of a.p.j abdul kalam has two wives, one of whom he married when she was 13 and he 16.

Ganesan, 54, orphan, will lay APJ Abdul Kalam to rest | The Indian Express

No thank you, these practices belong to the deserts of arabia, not other places.

sanghi ideology or "sanatan dharm" is a anti-human ideology that is not required in india or the world... the only people who are remotely attracted to it other than sanghis are hippies and western weapons manufacturers and similar brand of fools... even the hippies who imbibe charas and chant "om shanti shanti" will be horrified when they see what "sanatan dharm" actually means.

india is "suicide capital of the world" and other such wrong capitals mainly because of "sanatan dharm"... don't blame anyone else.

what are you saying?? you will not call for abolishing of interest-based economics and continue allowing people to suicide for economic reasons just because interest-less economics seems to you to be "sharia law"??

i am not saying india needs "sharia law"... all religions are anyway obsolete in near-future scenario... india needs hardcore socialism.

 

[Talwar e Pakistan]

Quite the opposite. India's wealth and prosperity relative to the rest of the world started declining as the Muslims came.

However are you suggesting that a man who "married" a 9 year old girl was the messenger of God
The fact that you can live relatively peacefully without killing everyone else around you is something you have imbibed from Hinduism.

Else, the more 'true Islam' you learn from the Arabs, the more suicide blasts, more pedophilia and more brother/sister marriages you will learn. Not that you are not heading in that direction already.

India reached its peak economically under Aurangzeb; India before Muslims were like Tribal Africans.
Your question about the Prophet is better answered here
How do Muslims feel about their Prophet, Mohammad, having married Aisha as a seemingly underage girl? - Quora

Hindus burning each other over "class" doesnt sound anywhere close to what your saying.

Saudi Arabia has no suicide blasts yet they are the most arabized country in the world, India is the leading country in rape and is far ahead of most Muslim countries in Pedophilia, and no one here marries brothers and sisters; maybe in India, because i've heard headlines (Indian news) all the time of people marry dogs and other animals.

Please, if we adopt Islamic practices, we would be stoning people to death on the streets, chopping hands off people for theivery and killing them for apostasy should they choose to leave a religion....all under the law ofcourse.

And if we adopt Islamic practices, women's testimony would be less than that of a man, a woman would need 4 witnesses to prove she was raped among the many other gems including the right to marry 9 year old girls... once again all under law.

No thank you, these Islamic practices belong to the deserts of arabia, not other places.

Stoning in Islam is illeagle, a person has to rob something of certain value to get hands cut off and its much more effective then sending the same thief in prison over and over, apostasy law was passed to prevent Abd-Allah ibn Ubayy and his men to leave and join enemy camps and was never ever enacted or enforced; people were free to leave and join Islam, you dont need four witnesses to prove a girl was raped; you however do need four witnesses for someone to be charged for adultery.

Islam is perfect, Humanity is not.

 

[jamahir]

Islam is perfect, Humanity is not.

islam brought simplification and justice for its time of establishment and for centuries after that... islam was a early organized socialist movement but modern socialist ideas brought further simplification to humanity... things like collectivization of production, free housing and the idea of abolishing of money system entirely... islam how ever much sophisticated compared to other older religions still worked with money system, for example... you can look at islam as one stop in a long sequence of socialist/progressive thought, and a stop where we must not stop but move onward towards further development.

like i said in my previous post, the only logical way forward is a post-religion scientific communist humanity.